Yugoslavian delegate Ales Bebler addresses the UN Security Council regarding hostilities in Korea

The transcript discusses the incomplete and contradictory nature of the information received so far, which prevents a fair judgment on the case's merits. It emphasizes the need for the Security Council to gather all factual knowledge to ensure any final judgment is beyond reproach.

What is the main issue with the information received from various dispatches?

• It is irrelevant.

• It is outdated.

• It is incomplete and contradictory.

• It is too detailed.

Why is it difficult to pass judgment on the merit of the case?

• The case is too complex.

• The information is not complete and balanced.

• The parties involved are uncooperative.

• There is a lack of interest.

What does the delegation believe the Security Council should do before passing final judgment?

• Consult with external experts.

• Gather all factual knowledge.

• Focus on one party's perspective.

• Delay the judgment indefinitely.

What is the desired outcome of acquiring all factual knowledge according to the delegation?

• To ensure the judgment is beyond reproach.

• To avoid making any decision.

• To satisfy all parties involved.

• To expedite the process.

What is the ultimate goal of the Security Council's action as mentioned in the final section?

• To please the majority.

• To ensure the action is incontrovertible.

• To make a quick decision.

• To avoid any responsibility.