The perceived threat of foreign architectural style dominance in Malaysia's built environment prompted specific discursive actions to safeguard national heritage. Which TWO of the following actions directly reflect efforts to address this concern and promote a distinct Malaysian architectural identity?
i) The rapid expansion of international architectural firm subsidiaries within major Malaysian cities.
ii) The convening of the ‘Kongres Kebudayaan Kebangsaan’ (1971), aimed at establishing a foundational understanding of national culture.
iii) The liberalization of building material import regulations to facilitate the use of diverse foreign construction techniques.
iv) The organization of the ‘Seminar Ke Arah Mewujudkan Identiti Senibina Nasional’ (1981), focused on defining and implementing a national architectural identity.