Reading Education and Cognitive Science

Reading Education and Cognitive Science

Assessment

Interactive Video

English

9th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Richard Gonzalez

FREE Resource

The video explores the debate between whole language theory and phonics in teaching reading. It highlights the historical context of whole language theory, its rise in the 60s and 70s, and the subsequent scientific criticisms that led to a shift back to phonics. The impact of COVID-19 on parental awareness and recent educational reforms are also discussed, emphasizing the importance of phonics in reading proficiency.

Read more

6 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the ability to read jumbled words suggest about the reading process?

Reading is a precise process.

Reading does not require any context.

Reading relies heavily on context clues.

Reading is solely based on phonics.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the primary method of teaching reading before the introduction of the whole language theory?

Phonics

Whole language approach

Visual learning

Contextual guessing

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main idea behind Marie Clay's cueing system?

Guessing words using context clues.

Memorizing words is the key.

Sounding out words is essential.

Ignoring the context of the passage.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did cognitive scientists discover about skilled readers?

They observe every letter in a word.

They guess words using context.

They rely solely on illustrations.

They skip unfamiliar words.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the COVID-19 pandemic influence reading education?

It reinforced the whole language theory.

It had no impact.

It made reading classes obsolete.

It led to a shift back to phonics-based instruction.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one fundamental flaw of the whole language theory?

It focuses too much on grammar.

It overemphasizes phonics.

It assumes literacy acquisition is like speech acquisition.

It ignores the role of illustrations.