Font size
WorksheetsCER TEKA KES APA NI
Total questions: 18
Worksheet time: 9mins
what is the case to illustrate INVITATION TO TREAT (ITT) display of good on window shop?
BELL v FISHER
PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY of GREAT BRITAIN v BOOTS CASH CHEMIST
FISHER v BELL
CARLILL v CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL CO
What is the name of the case that describe about advertisement?
CARLILL v CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL CO
COELHO v THE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMISSION
PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY of GREAT BRITAIN v BOOTS CASH CHEMIST
FISHER v BELL
In RAMSGATE VICTORIA HOTEL v MONTEFIORE, the contract was revoke due to lapse of time.
TRUE
FALSE
This fruits name is
Mangga
Ciku
Kedongdong
Asam
What is the name of the case where the plaintiff failed to fulfill condition precedent?
RAMSGATE VICTORIA HOTEL CO v MONTEFIORE
HYDE v WRENCH
PAYNE v CAVE
HARVEY v FACEY
In HYDE v WRENCH, the contract was not valid as the acceptance was
ABSOLUTE & UNQUALIFIED
NOT ABSOLUTE & QUALIFIED
ABSOLUTE & QUALIFIED
NOT ABSOLUTE & UNQUALIFIED
According to FELTHOUSE v BINDLEY, silent does not mean an acceptance.
FALSE
TRUE
The case about POSTAL RULE where acceptance is completed once the letter was posted in mail box
FELTHOUSE v BINDLEY
BYRNE v VAN TIENHOVEN
HYDE v WRENCH
CARLILL v CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL CO
What is the name of an active volcano mountain in Japan?
Mount Merapi
Mount Fuji
Mount Tambora
Mount Sinabung
In PHANG SWEE KIM v BEH I HOCK, the contract is valid even though the _____ is not adequate
offer
consideration
acceptance
intention
Payment by 3rd party is a good consideration. Which case to illustrate this point?
KERPA SINGH v BARIAM SINGH
PHANG SWEE KIM v BEH I HOCK
QUECK POH GUAN v QUICK AWANG
KEPONG PROSPECTING LTD v SCHMIDT
In QUECK POH GUAN v QUICK AWANG the contract was valid without consideration
TRUE
FALSE
What is the case to illustrate the definition of INTENTION?
BALFOUR v BALFOUR
MERRITT v MERRITT
QUECK POH GUAN v QUICK AWANG
CARLILL v CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL CO
In MERRITT v MERRITT, domestic agreement is a valid contract because
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FAMILY MEMBER NO LONGER EXIST
THE HUSBAND DIED
THEY WERE IN DIVORCE PROCESS
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FAMILY MEMBER STILL EXIST
what is the case to illustrate for uncertainty?
GOVERNMENT of MALAYSIA v GURCHARAN SINGH
KARUPPAN CHETTY v SUAH TIAN
MAHOMED SYEDOL ARIFFIN v YEOH OOI GARK
DATUK JAGINDER SINGH & ORS v TARA RAJARATNAM
The case to illustrate the exception where a child can enter marriage contract is
MOHORI BIBEE v DHURMODAS GHOSE
NASH v INMAN
RAJESWARY v BALAKRISHNAN
GOVERNMENT of MALAYSIA v GURCHARAN SINGH
The principles of law in TAN HEE JUAN v TEH BOON KIAT is a person must be 18 years old to enter a contract.
TRUE
FALSE
What logo is this?
Audi
Mercedes-Benz
BMW
Mazda
