Font size
WorksheetsPhilosophy Exam Review
Total questions: 100
Worksheet time: 50mins
a command that orders us to do something
unconditionally, regardless of our aims or purposes
categorical imperative
maxim
formalist
contexualist
hard cases
describes real-life moral dilemmas in which ordinary moral opinions are either hopeless contradictory or else just confused
categorical imperative
maxim
formalist
contextualist
hard cases
believes that each ethical problem must be judged individually; that each ethical situation is unique
categorical imperative
maxim
formalist
contextualist
hard cases
believes that the criteria used in making ethical decisions are universal, apply to all men and women and should be known by all people
categorical imperative
maxim
formalist
contextualist
hard cases
a universal rule
categorical imperative
maxim
formalist
contextualist
hard cases
position people take on an issue
argument
issue
conclusion
substance
reasons
premises that support conclusions
argument
issue
conclusion
substance
reasons
a conclusion that someone has about a particular
issue, supported with reasons
argument
issue
conclusion
substance
reasons
the question that is being addressed
argument
issue
conclusion
substance
reasons
supporting evidence that gives an opinion credibility
argument
issue
conclusion
substance
reasons
the theory that there are two fundamentally different kinds of things in this world: bodies and minds
autonomous
mind-body problem
materialism
idealism
dualism
having the right or power of self-government; giving law to oneself
autonomous
mind-body problem
materialism
idealism
dualism
the theory that minds or spirits are all that exist; physical objects are only ideas in the mind
autonomous
mind-body problem
materialism
idealism
dualism
the problem of explaining the exact relationship
between our minds and our physical bodies in space
autonomous
mind-body problem
materialism
idealism
dualism
the theory that physical objects in space are the only things that exist; everything else is simply a combination of physical objects
autonomous
mind-body problem
materialism
idealism
dualism
based on the false assumption that deceit, lying, promise breaking, etc. are justified if they are the same sort engaged in by those you are dealing with
rationalization
“If it’s Necessary, it’s Ethical”
“If it’s Legal and Permissible, it is Proper"
“I was Just Doing it For You”
“I’m Just Fighting Fire with Fire”
primary justification of “white lies” or withholding important information in personal or professional relationships
rationalization
“If it’s Necessary, it’s Ethical”
“If it’s Legal and Permissible, it is Proper”
“I was Just Doing it For You”
“I’m Just Fighting Fire with Fire”
justification; plausible, not necessarily true, but reasons for
doing an action
rationalization
“If it’s Necessary, it’s Ethical”
“If it’s Legal and Permissible, it is Proper"
“I was Just Doing it For You”
“I’m Just Fighting Fire with Fire”
substitutes legal requirements for personal moral judgment
rationalization
“If it’s Necessary, it’s Ethical”
“If it’s Legal and Permissible, it is Proper"
“I was Just Doing it For You”
“I’m Just Fighting Fire with Fire”
based on the false presumption that necessity breeds propriety
rationalization
“If it’s Necessary, it’s Ethical”
“If it is Legal and Permissible, it is Proper"
“I was Just Doing it For You”
“I’m Just Fighting Fire with Fire”
applying everywhere and always
empiricism
rationalism
Socratic Method
universality
unity of consciousness
a process of questions and answers by which we
systematically reach deeper insights into the principles of truth and goodness
empiricism
rationalism
Socratic Method
universality
unity of consciousness
the belief that the thoughts and perceptions of
any given mind are bound together in a single consciousness
empiricism
rationalism
Socratic Method
universality
unity of consciousness
the theory that at least some human knowledge comes from reason, unaided by the senses, and therefore we can know about things that the senses do not reveal can know with greater certainty than the senses will allow
empiricism
rationalism
Socratic Method
universality
unity of consciousness
the theory that all human knowledge comes from
the evidence of our five senses, and therefore we can never know more, or know with greater certainty, than our senses will allow
empiricism
rationalism
Socratic Method
universality
unity of consciousness
according to Descartes, this is the gateway between the body and the mind
determinism
free will
pineal gland
consciousness
self-consciousness
being aware of one's self
determinism
free will
pineal gland
consciousness
self-consciousness
an awareness of one’s own awareness
determinism
free will
pineal gland
consciousness
self-consciousness
voluntary choice or decision
determinism
free will
pineal gland
consciousness
self-consciousness
the theory that acts of the will are causally determined by preceding events or natural laws; the most extreme case would be fatalism
determinism
free will
pineal gland
consciousness
self-consciousness
the study of moral judgment
philosophy
metaphysics
epistemology
political philosophy
ethics
the love of wisdom; the systematic critical examination of the way in which we judge, evaluate and act, with the aim of making ourselves wiser, more self-reflective and therefore better
philosophy
metaphysics
epistemology
political philosophy
ethics
the study of social institutions; covers broad topics such as economics, sociology, politics, and sometimes religion
philosophy
metaphysics
epistemology
political philosophy
ethics
the study of the nature of reality; the study of the most fundamental principles of the nature of things
philosophy
metaphysics
epistemology
political philosophy
ethics
the study of knowledge; the study of how we come to know things, what the limits are of our knowledge, and what sort of certainty or uncertainty attaches to our knowledge
philosophy
metaphysics
epistemology
political philosophy
ethics
this test asks you to determine if the principle on which you are basing your action is consistent with a higher or more general principle you accept
Ethical Relativism
Role Exchange Test
Universal Consequence Test
New Cases Test
Higher Principles Test
this test focuses on the general results of an action you might take; you imagine what would happen if everyone in a situation similar to yours took this action
Ethical Relativism
Role Exchange Test
Universal Consequence Test
New Cases Test
Higher Principles Test
this test asks you to consider whether your action is consistent with other actions which are in the same category; you choose the hardest case and see if you would act the same way
Ethical Relativism
Role Exchange Test
Universal Consequence Test
New Cases Test
Higher Principles Test
this test asks you to empathize with the people who will be affected by the action you take
Ethical Relativism
Role Exchange Test
Universal Consequence Test
New Cases Test
Higher Principles Test
holds that rightness or wrongness of an act depends on the society in which it was committed
Ethical Relativism
Role Exchange Test
Universal Consequence Test
New Cases Test
Higher Principles Test
beliefs about what is good and important that form the basis of opinions on issues
assumptions
reality assumptions
value assumptions
syllogism
catergorical statement
a deductive argument where the conclusion is inferred from two premises
assumptions
reality assumptions
value assumptions
syllogism
categorical statement
beliefs about what is true and factual that are sometimes stated, and sometimes implied; these are often taken for granted
assumptions
reality assumptions
value assumptions
syllogism
categorical statement
a belief, based on the experience, observations or desires of an individual or group
assumptions
reality assumptions
value assumptions
syllogism
categorical statement
a statement that has one class included in another class
assumptions
reality assumptions
value assumptions
syllogism
categorical statement
ignores the fact that a loss of objectivity always prevents perception of the loss of objectivity, and ways in which gratitude, friendship or anticipation of future favors can affect judgement
“It Doesn’t Hurt Anyone”
“It Can’t be Wrong. Everyone’s Doing It"
“It’s OK if I Don’t Gain Personally"
“I’ve Got it Coming”
“I Can be Objective”
justifies improper conduct done for others or for institutional purposes on the false assumption that personal gain is the only test of impropriety
. “It Doesn’t Hurt Anyone”
“It Can’t be Wrong. Everyone’s Doing It"
It's OK if I Don't Gain Personally"
"I've Got it Coming"
"I Can Be Objective"
persons who feel they are overworked or underpaid rationalize that minor “perks” are nothing more than fair compensation for services rendered
"It Doesn't Hurt Anyone"
It Can't Be Wrong, Everyone's Doing It"
It's OK if I Don't Gain Personally"
"I've Got it Coming"
"I Can Be Objective"
used to excuse misconduct based on the false assumption that one can violate ethical principles so long as there is no clear and immediate harm to others
"It Doesn't Hurt Anyone"
"It Can't Be Wrong. Everyone's Doing It."
"It's OK if I Don't Gain Personally"
"I've Got it Coming"
"I Can Be Objective"
a false “safety in numbers” rationale fed by the tendency to uncritically adopt cultural, organizational or occupational behavior systems as if they were ethical
"It Doesn't Hurt Anyone"
"It Can't Be Wrong. Everyone's Doing it"
"It's OK If I Don't Gain Personally"
"I've Got It Coming"
"I Can Be Objective"
a form of argument that builds and depends upon a series of conditions being met
conditional statement
enthymemes
chain argument
premise of contention
solipsism
the view that only the individual exists; everything else is only an idea in his or her mind
conditional statement
enthymemes
chain argument
premise of contention
solipsism
in deductive reasoning, a major premise which states that if the condition cited in the first part of a statement is true, then the 2nd part is also true
conditional statement
enthymemes
chain argument
premise of contention
solipsism
syllogisms with a key part or parts that are implied instead of being directly stated, with the supplied by the reader or listener
conditional statement
enthymemes
chain argument
premise of contention
solipsism
in a syllogism, this is the questionable premise; the premise under dispute
conditional statement
enthymemes
chain argument
premise of contention
solipsism
the highest values are to love God and to love one’s neighbor; based on
biblical principles
Utilitarianism
Egalitarianism
Judeo-Christian Principles
Universal Ethical Norms
Libertarianism
the highest value is that which promotes the greatest
general happiness and minimizes unhappiness
Utilitarianism
Egalitarianism
Judeo-Christian Principles
Universal Ethical Norms
Libertarianism
the highest value is equality; behavior is ethical when the same opportunities and consequences apply to all people
Utilitarianism
Egalitarianism
Judeo-Christian Principles
Universal Ethical Norms
Libertarianism
the highest value is to promote the liberty of all; allows a person freedom as long as it does not restrict
the freedom of others
Utilitarianism
Egalitarianism
Judeo-Christian Principles
Universal Ethical Norms
Libertarianism
universal ethical principles exist and are self-evident and are obvious to rational individuals of every culture
Utilitarianism
Egalitarianism
Judeo-Christian Principles
Universal Ethical Norms
Libertarianism
something that reflects the inner nature of an individual subject
objectivity
subjectivity
true argument
valid argument
sound argument
an argument structured in a correct deductive format
objectivity
subjectivity
true argument
valid argument
sound argument
a valid deductive argument whose premises are true
objectivity
subjectivity
true argument
valid argument
sound argument
an argument whose premises are true
objectivity
subjectivity
true argument
valid argument
sound argument
being true to the way the world really is, not merely reflecting the inner nature of an individual subject
objectivity
subjectivity
true argument
valid argument
sound argument
the founder of modern utilitarianism; believes ethical decisions can be made using a mathematical equation of happiness; wrote “An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation”
Gottfried Liebniz
Aristotle
Thomas Hobbes
Jeremy Bentham
John Stuart Mill
a rationalist philosopher; he distinguished two sorts of truths: the Truths of Reasoning and the Truths of Fact; wrote “The Monadology"
Gottfried Liebniz
Aristotle
Thomas Hobbes
Jeremy Bentham
John Stuart Mill
considered the most brilliant, insightful consistent materialist since the times of ancient Greece; believed in absolutism of rulers; wrote Leviathan
Gottfried Liebniz
Aristotle
Thomas Hobbes
Jeremy Bentham
John Stuart Mill
the phrase “metaphysics” was coined in reference to his work; his essays on first philosophy came after his works
on physics
Gottfried Liebniz
Aristotle
Thomas Hobbes
Jeremy Bentham
John Stuart Mill
created the “Greatest Happiness Principle”; addressed an action’s general impact on the world
Gottfried Liebniz
Aristotle
Thomas Hobbes
Jeremy Bentham
John Stuart Mill
a rationalist, dualist philosopher who tried to address the mind-
body problem while explaining the physical universe; wrote Meditations;
the only truth he believed was,
“I think, therefore I am.”
Socrates
Plato
David Hume
Immanuel Kant
Rene Descartes
was the most famous philosophers of all times;
believed that, “The unexamined life is not worth living.”
Socrates
Plato
David Hume
Immanuel Kant
Rene Descartes
was a brilliantly gifted, wealthy young man who was a student of Socrates; wrote, “The Republic ”; believed that government should be run by those who possessed the qualifications rather than popularity alone; was a teacher of Aristotle
Socrates
Plato
David Hume
Immanuel Kant
Rene Descartes
an Empiricist philosopher; he adopted the blank white paper theory, the copy theory, and the atomic theory; wrote,
“A Treatise of Human Nature”
Socrates
Plato
David Hume
Immanuel Kant
Rene Descartes
philosopher who strongly believed in
Epistemology; came up with the idea of compromising between rationalism and empiricism, and invented the phrase “unity of consciousness; created the theory of the categorical imperative; wrote Critique of Pure Reason
Socrates
Plato
David Hume
Immanuel Kant
Rene Descartes
Which of the following is not one of the major schools of philosophy?
metaphysics
ethics
political philosophy
existentialism
epistemology
Which of the following is a means by which a person can strengthen their ability to be a critical thinker:
by understanding the structure of arguments
by understanding the ways the media frames issues
by understanding the quality of evidence used to support reasoning
all of these are means by which a person can strengthen their critical thinking abilities
Although we don’t generally speak in syllogisms, it is important to understand the structure of them because it helps us as critical thinkers to determine if a thought is valid and sound.
true
false
Which of the following statements is not true?
rationalists believe knowledge is acquired through reason, and trust that there is no “great deceiver deceiving you; empiricists believe knowledge is acquired through experience
empiricists believe knowledge is acquired through reason, and trust that there is no “great deceiver deceiving you; rationalists believe knowledge is acquired through experience
Is the following statement valid or sound?
If you want to vote in the United States, you must be a citizen.
Svetlana voted in the last presidential election.
Therefore, Svetlana is a U.S. citizen.
valid
sound
Is the following statement valid or sound?
All men are slobs.
Joe is a man.
Therefore, Joe is a slob.
valid
sound
Is the following statement valid or sound?
All humans are mortal
Jamie is human.
Therefore, Jamie is mortal
valid
sound
Is the following statement valid or sound?
All women are terrible drivers.
Lisa is a woman.
Therefore, Lisa is a terrible driver.
valid
sound
What philosophical theory maintains that every event has a cause?
free will
determinism
idealism
metaphysics
Which of the following is true about determinism and predestination:
determinism believes events happen as a result
of a scientific causal chain of events; predestination believes events happen as a result of supernatural influence
predestination believes events happen as a result of a scientific causal chain of events; determinism believes events happen as a result of supernatural influence
determinism and predestination both happen as a result of scientific causal chain of events
determinism and predestination both happen as a result of supernatural influence
A philosopher who believes in the existence of physical matter:
must be a dualist
can’t be a dualist
might be an idealist
must be a materialist
might be either a dualist or a materialist
Although the theories of free will and determinism are often debated, in this country determinism is believed to be the correct explanation of the course of events.
true
false
According to the consciousness objection, we
are not merely material beings. It is because of this we are distinct from computers and machines.
true
false
Although materialism, idealism or dualism each attempt to explain existence, of these three the most accurate metaphysical explanation of existence comes through understanding dualism.
true
false
Where in society do you see the argument of free will vs. determinism argued most often?
legal system
politics
education
military
According to free will, we are not morally responsible for our actions.
true
false
Which of the following type of determinist would ask whether outside influences and constraints forced an action or if actions were committed as a result of own internal volitions:
free will-ist
self-determinist
soft determinism
hard determinist
Honesty is very important to me, but when necessary I will cheat on an exam. (Just not this exam! Mrs. Dudley would be so disappointed!)
For this example:
the real value is passing an exam; the ideal value is honesty
the ideal value is passing an exam; the real value is honesty
Being well-read is important to me. When I have free time, however, I watch T.V.
For this example:
the real value is reading books; the ideal value is watching T.V.
the ideal value is reading books; the real value is watching T.V.
Being physically fit is important to me, but I eat fast food every single day.
For this example:
the real value is eating fast food; the ideal value is being healthy
the ideal value is eating fast food; the real value is being healthy
One of the major disadvantages of Kantian ethics is that it is very rigid - ethical principles should be adhered to regardless of the consequences.
true
false
Which of the following is not a reason to think about ethics:
to search for a method or process of reasoning that will lead us to do the right thing
to prove that there are certain universally valid standards of conduct
to attain the “good life”
to acknowledge that humans should not be held to any standard of conduct
Autonomous ethics arise from within oneself and the individual makes decisions about what constitutes moral or immoral action. With authoritarian ethics, decisions about right and wrong are given, by an authority, a society or deity and these laws are immutable and final.
true
false
One of the most important objections to utilitarianism is that
not everyone wants to be happy
it’s too simple to account for all ethical situations
it fails to define happiness
it sometimes justifies people performing types
of acts which are believed to be immoral
Immanuel Kant believed that the proper foundation of morality could be established by
consulting religious doctrine
the use of reason alone
divine inspiration
careful observation of human society
