NEW
Font size
WorksheetsUnit 3: AP Government Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
Total questions: 69
Worksheet time: 38mins
Which amendment makes it clear that enumerating rights in the Constitution or Bill of Rights does not mean that others do not exist?
1st Amendment
5th Amendment
9th Amendment
10th Amendment
In this Supreme Court case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights limited only the actions of the Federal government and not those of the states.
Gitlow v. New York
Barron v. Baltimore
Near v. Minnesota
Palko v. Connecticut
___________________________ are the personal guarantees and freedoms that the government cannot abridge, by law, constitution, or judicial interpretation.
Civil Liberties
Civil Rights
Civil Disobedience
Civil Society
The due process guarantee can be found in
5th Amendment
6th Amendment
14th Amendment
5th and 14th Amendments
The government may not curb or censor expression before the fact; this is known as
symbolic speech
commercial speech
prior restraint
sedition
Which of the following receives the most protection?
political speech
libel
slander
fighting words
This clause of the First Amendment prevents the government from creating a national religion, nor may it sanction or favor a religion.
Due Process Clause
Establishment Clause
Free Exercise Clause
Elastic Clause
This clause of the First Amendment prevents government from interfering in the practice of one's religion.
Establishment Clause
Due Process Clause
Elastic Clause
Free Exercise Clause
The test used to determine if state aid to religious schools violates the Establishment Clause is called the
clear and present danger test
castle doctrine
Lemon test
Miranda rule
When the process of incorporation is referred to as "selective," it is in reference to the fact that
the Court only incorporates a right in some cases but not all.
incorporation has happened on an amendment-by-amendment basis.
extension of rights may be withheld from some groups, such as students.
decisions from those cases do not set precedent for future cases.
Which of the following is an example of a good faith exception, as it relates to the exclusionary rule?
A search warrant was issued, but the judge forgot to sign it.
There was a warrantless search, but eye-witnesses saw the suspect with the evidence.
Evidence was obtained without a warrant but by a private citizen and not the police.
The search warrant listed the wrong type of evidence the police were looking for.
Which of the following cases most likely involves a violation of civil rights?
Classifying people into brackets on the basis of income and taxing them at different rates
Classifying people in any way, using any system that treats one group of people differently from another
Classifying people and treating them differently on the basis of race or gender
Giving adults more rights, such as voting or drinking alcohol, than the rights possessed by minors
The extension of marriage rights to same-sex couples was done under which of the following justifications?
Those rights fall under the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.
Denying those rights does not pass the intermediate scrutiny used for sex discrimination.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was interpreted to outlaw such discrimination.
A person's choice in spouse was a private matter, protected by the 4th amendment.
As part of the Women's Right Movement, Title IX attempted to take the concept of equal protection under the law and extend it to the realm of
private employment.
college admissions.
abortion rights.
educational programs.
What was the significance of sending federal troops to protect African-American students in Little Rock, Arkansas in 1957?
It led to a federal takeover of many Southern public schools
It strengthened control of education by state governments
It was the first time martial law had been declared in the United States
It showed that the government would enforce court decisions on integration
The Supreme Court has consistently upheld that suspected terrorists in U.S. detention are guarenteed
Equal Protection
Due Process
Habeas Corpus
Ex Post Fact
"Unreasonable Search and Seizure" is protected by which amendment?
3
4
5
8
The Supreme Court overturned laws regulating birth control in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) on the grounds that such laws violated the right to privacy. Why was this a controversial decision?
The Court's decision clashed with the right of free exercise for those religiously opposed to birth control.
The right to privacy is never mentioned by name in the Bill of Rights.
The laws had been approved by an overwhelming majority of voters in Connecticut.
The decision to overturn the law injected government rules into private business enterprises.
What are the five liberties of the 1st Amendment?
Speech, Press, Religion, Assembly, Petition
Speech, bear arms, religion, assembly, press
Right to a trial, speech, press, assembly, bear arms
Press, speech, inenumerated right, bear arms, assembly
What does the Establishment Clause do?
keeps the gov from making a mandatory religion
establishes justice
establishes term limits
establishes taxes
What Law made all public spaces accessible to all individuals?
1st amendment
ADA
civil rights act of 1964
civil rights act of 1968
This civil liberty prevents making an act a crime, when at the time the act was committed it was not unlawful.
Ex post facto laws
Habeas corpus
Bills of attainder
All the above
This civil liberty prevents an unfair arrest and imprisonment.
Bills of attainder
Habeas corpus
Ex post facto laws
All the above
What kind of defamatory speech is written?
libel
slander
hate speech
speech that presents a clear and present danger
What kind of defamatory speech is spoken?
libel
slander
hate speech
speech that presents a clear and present danger
What was the government act that sent Japanese Americans to the internment camps?
Executive Order 255
Executive Order 9066
Executive Order 99
Defcon 4
Speech urging the resistance to lawful authority or advocating the overthrow of the government
Commercial Speech
Fighting Words
Libel
Seditious Speech
A white male student claimed he was rejected into medical school twice because of reverse discrimination.
Obergefell v. Hodges
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Hernandez v. Texas
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Policies that give preference to women or minorities for jobs, promotions, admission to schools, or other benefits is:
Segregation
Affirmative Action
Integration
Discrimination
Non-verbal communication that expresses an opinion
seditious speech
symbolic speech
commercial speech
Which is not an example of protected symbolic speech under the First Amendment?
flag burning to protest US government policies
hate speech at a Klan rally
draft card burning
Campaign contributions are a protected form of symbolic speech because it is expressing support for a candidate and their ideas
True
False
Are fighting words protected by the freedom of speech?
Yes
No
An obscenity, or sexually explicit material,
is protected speech.
is not protected speech because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that any speech or material that lacks "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value is not protected under the 1st amendment.
This Supreme Court standard/test states that "the right to free expression, though not absolute, occupies a higher, preferred position in comparison to othe rights, such as property rights."
Imminent danger
Neutrality
Clarity
Least-restrictive means
Preferred position
This Supreme Court standard/test states that "any restriction to speech, such as a requirement that parades or demonstration not disrupt other people exercise of their rights, must not favor one gropup over an other."
Imminent danger
Neutrality
Clarity
Least-restrictive means
Preferred position
This Supreme Court standard/test states that "towns, states, and federal government must both neutral and clear standars to guide adminstrators in issuing the permit. It also must have clear definitions, like laws that punish obscentity must have a clear definition of obscenity."
Imminent danger
Neutrality
Clarity
Least-restrictive means
Preferred position
This Supreme Court standard/test states that "if it is necessary to restrict the exercise of one right to protect the exercise of another, the method should use the least amount of restriction to achieve this end. Example: If the press threathens a person's right to a fair trial, the judge could request transfering the case to another town, rather than issuing a "gag order"."
Imminent danger
Neutrality
Clarity
Least-restrictive means
Preferred position
Which clause in the Constitution ensures that judicial acts and contracts made in one state will be binding and enforceable in another?
Supremacy Clause
Necessary and Proper Clause
Full Faith and Credit Clause
Spending Clause
This type of segregation was mandated by law and was exclusive to the American south.
De Facto segregation
De Jure segregation
This type of segregation was based on custom and tradition was exclusive to northern states.
De Facto Segregation
De Jure Segregation
If the policy uses REASONABLE means to achieve a legitimate governmental goal, it is constitutional.
rational basis
intermediate scrutiny
strict scrutiny
If the policy "serves an important government interest" and is "SUBSTANTIALLY RELATED" to serving that interest, it is constitutional.
rational basis
intermediate scrutiny
strict scrunity
To be constitutional, the discrimination must serve a "compelling government interest," it must be "NARROWLY TAILORED" to attain that interests, and it must use the "LEAST RESTRICTIVE MEANS" to attain it.
rational basis
intermediate scrutiny
strict scrutiny
Ex: Men can be punished for staturoy rape even if women are not punished because men and women are not "similarly situated." OR men can be barred from entering hospital delivery rooms.
rational basis
intermediate scrutiny
strict scrunity
EX: 21 to drink (prevent children/undeveloped brains from drinking)
rational basis
intermediate scrutiny
strict scrutiny
EX: distintions based on race, ethnicity, religion, or voting MUST PASS THIS TEST.
rational basis
intermediate scrutiny
strict scrutiny
How might rules about pay confidentiality help companies avoid lawsuits about discrimination?
The rules would make it illegal for employees to sue over differences in pay.
Since everyone would know how much other employees made, there would be no need to sue.
Employees wouldn't know that they made less than others doing the same job.
You could fire employees for discussing pay, so filing a lawsuit would be impossible.
"something for something" something given in exchange for something else (such as a favor)
status quo
quid pro quo
ergo
ad hoc
States CAN pass laws to regulate abortion so long as they do not create an "undue burden" regarding access to abortion
Lawrence v. Texas
Casey v. Planned Parenthood
Roe v. Wade
Reno v. ACLU
States could not deny a couple a marriage license on account of the different race of the couple
Obergefell v. Hodges
Grutter v. Bolinger
Windsor v. US
Loving v. Virginia
Same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000)
Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
US v. Windsor (2013)
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
Bostock v. Clayton County (2020)
State law may not ban sexual relations between same-sex partners
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000)
Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
US v. Windsor (2013)
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
Bostock v. Clayton County (2020)
a priavte organization may ban LGTBQIA+ from its membership
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000)
Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
US v. Windsor (2013)
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
Bostock v. Clayton County (2020)
LGBTQIA+ persons are protect from employment discrimination under federal law
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000)
Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
US v. Windsor (2013)
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
Bostock v. Clayton County (2020)
LBGTQIA+ couples married in states where same-sex marriage is legal must receive the same federal health, tax, and other benifits that heterosexual couples receive
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000)
Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
US v. Windsor (2013)
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
Bostock v. Clayton County (2020)
A law enacted by Congress in 1998 that allowed states to refuse to recognize gay marriages or civil unions formed in other jurisdictions. The Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional in 2013.
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
USA PATRIOT Act
Straight Marriage Act
A 2001 law that gave the government new powers to monitor suspected terrorists and their associates, including the ability to access personal information.
USA PATRIOT Act
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
Anti-Terror Act
