Ethics can pinpoint where individuals disagree over a moral issue by clarifying the issue.

The decisions made by an individual on a moral issue depends on what ethical framework he/she follows.

A person’s ethical beliefs can shift immediately depending on how the moral issue would be presented and clarified.

Certain groups can use morality to justify less humane treatment to people who they believe to practice what is wrong for them.

“Pagiging mabuting tao” is considered as the virtue believed to be the highest form of one’s overall morality.

One can teach others how to be a “mabuting tao” by giving them humane treatment.

Congruence between the person’s characteristics of the “loob” and the manifested actions shown externally is not important when evaluating his/her overall morality.

The concepts of “pagiging mabuting tao” and “pagiging makatao ng pagtrato” are distinct yet inseparable when viewed in the light of standards of Filipino morality.

A person can be viewed as “Mabuti” as long as he or she shows goodness in certain circumstances or with certain persons.

The ability to distinguish right from wrong is the most important factor that will help a person become “morally good.”

Discernment is vital for individuals since it helps them understand the consequences of their moral actions and helps them to further determine what is right and good.

In the Philippine context, the moral system that guides the actions of the individual is all about carrying out what is right and correct.

Gratitude the central moral emotion that most commonly motivates prosocial activity towards others.

Free will is often conceived of as a kind of power to control one’s choices and actions.