Font size
WorksheetsCathay Pacific Case Midterm Quiz
Total questions: 10
Worksheet time: 5mins
What is the main complaint filed by the respondents in this case?
Breach of contract
Fraudulent advertising
Negligence
Defamation
What was the reason given by Cathay Pacific for the cancellation of the respondents' return flight bookings?
Insufficient seats available
Technical issues with the airplane
Fictitious bookings made by Sampaguita Travel
Weather conditions
What type of damages were the respondents seeking in their complaint?
Moral damages
Exemplary damages
Actual damages
Nominal damages
What did the Court of Appeals order Cathay Pacific to pay to the respondents?
₱1,000,000.00 as moral damages
₱300,000.00 as actual damages
₱25,000.00 each as nominal damages
₱100,000.00 as attorney's fees
What did the trial court find regarding the respondents' return flight bookings?
They were confirmed and valid.
They were fictitious and not valid.
They were cancelled by Cathay Pacific.
They were not properly handled by Sampaguita Travel.
Who did Cathay Pacific blame for the cancellation of the respondents' return flights?
Wilfredo Reyes
Sixta Lapuz
Sampaguita Travel
The Court of Appeals
What type of contract did respondents enter into with Cathay Pacific?
Contract of sale
Contract of lease
Contract of carriage
Contract of employment
What is the purpose of nominal damages?
To compensate for actual loss suffered
To punish the defendant for bad faith
To vindicate or recognize a violated right
To deter others from similar actions
What is the relationship between Cathay Pacific and respondents in this case?
Employer and employee
Landlord and tenant
Common carrier and passenger
Seller and buyer
What did respondents fail to prove in their claim for actual damages?
The amount of loss incurred
The existence of a contract
The negligence of Cathay Pacific
The bad faith of Sampaguita Travel
