NEW
Font size
WorksheetsRound 2: Scenario Sprint – Strategic Thinking & Decision-Making
Total questions: 10
Worksheet time: 20mins
Your company is experiencing a wave of resignations in the middle management layer, primarily from the operations department. The exit interviews consistently point to lack of growth opportunities and poor communication with top management. While salary levels are market-competitive, there is a consistent undercurrent of dissatisfaction among team leaders who feel “invisible” in decision-making. This trend, if not addressed, could disrupt project continuity and delay client deliveries. As the CHRO, what is the most strategic first step you would take to address this?
Introduce a salary hike for all team leaders
Immediately launch a top-down performance monitoring initiative
Initiate a leadership listening circle with middle managers
Hire external consultants to assess the organizational climate
Your organization is pushing for stronger Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) outcomes. A key leadership position (VP – Operations) is open, and you’ve received two final candidates. One is a highly qualified male candidate with 18 years of experience, aligned with internal culture. The second is a woman with 12 years of relevant experience and leadership promise but slightly lower domain expertise. DEI reports show poor representation of women in leadership roles, and board pressure to improve diversity has intensified. What is the best strategic approach in this situation?
Hire the senior male candidate and close the position quickly
Recommend the woman candidate as a strategic investment in DEI
Keep both on hold and look for a better third option
Push the final decision back to the business unit head
In your product design team, one employee consistently outperforms KPIs and delivers results ahead of time. However, 360-degree feedback reveals their lack of collaboration, poor peer communication, and dismissive attitude. Three junior team members have expressed concerns about feeling undervalued and demotivated. The line manager is hesitant to take action as the individual contributes heavily to key projects. What is the most strategic action as an HR partner?
Ignore the complaints as performance is excellent
Reward the employee publicly and set them as a benchmark
Hold a coaching conversation focusing on emotional intelligence
Recommend demotion to protect team morale
Your organization recently launched an expensive leadership development program for mid-level managers, aimed at promoting internal mobility. Despite great content and trainers, participation rates have been below 30%, and feedback indicates “time pressure” and “irrelevance” as key concerns. Meanwhile, external hires continue to be made for senior roles, creating dissatisfaction among internal staff. How would you tackle this issue from a strategic HR perspective?
Make the program mandatory for promotion
Cancel the program due to poor ROI
Redesign content with manager feedback and flexible modules
Increase internal job postings to drive participation
Post-pandemic, your company moved to a hybrid model with 3 days remote and 2 days in office. However, recent engagement surveys show that remote employees feel disconnected, lack visibility, and believe in-office staff are being favored for opportunities. There is rising dissatisfaction and perception of bias, especially among those working from different cities. What is the most effective strategy to maintain equity and inclusion in hybrid culture?
Mandate equal in-office attendance for all employees
Provide extra bonuses to remote employees as compensation
Launch a transparent, outcomes-based performance & visibility model
Rotate team leaders weekly to ensure fairness
You are the HR Director at a mid-sized firm. Your top sales manager — responsible for 25% of revenue — has received an external job offer. However, internal team feedback says this manager is difficult, poor at collaboration, and impacts morale. You’re under pressure from leadership to retain them. What is the most effective and sustainable decision?
Counter the offer and retain the employee at all costs
Let the employee go and find a replacement immediately
Offer retention only if they agree to behavioral change with leadership coaching
Promote them to a higher role and hope they mature
A young employee in your R&D team has shown exceptional performance. They've submitted two patentable innovations and received external recognition. However, some senior team members feel alienated, stating that the spotlight has demotivated them. Tensions are rising. How would you handle the situation as an HR leader?
Publicly celebrate the star employee again to set an example
Reassign the employee to another team to restore balance
Conduct a team-level recognition and mentoring session
Ask the manager to keep the praise internal
One of your senior managers has delivered record-breaking numbers this quarter. However, anonymous complaints report that they overwork their team, use offensive language, and ignore work-life balance norms. What’s your next move?
Ignore the complaint — output speaks for itself
Launch a confidential inquiry and speak to the team
Delay action until performance review is over
Send an appreciation letter for the results
Your organization has seen friction between Gen Z employees and older managers. The younger group wants flexibility, remote work, and fast-track promotions. Senior managers see this as entitlement and lack of work ethic. What would be a constructive first step?
Ignore both sides and stick to policy
Conduct a generational bias workshop to bridge the gap
Allow Gen Z employees to form a separate working group
Restrict remote work to maintain structure
After adopting a hybrid model, several remote employees claim they are being passed over for promotions, compared to office-based colleagues. Their productivity is similar, but managers say visibility is lower. How do you address this perception gap?
Mandate all employees return to the office 3 days a week
Instruct managers to treat both groups equally without metrics
Implement a transparent, outcome-based performance framework
Avoid intervention — let it evolve naturally
