WorksheetsEPA-II HSL Session
Total questions: 14
Worksheet time: 11hrs 18mins
Where do systematic reviews and meta-analyses fall on the pyramid of evidence—higher or lower than RCTs?
Higher
Lower
Same Tier
Not Present on the Pyramid of Evidence
Why do you think they are placed there?
Which part of PICO does ‘ARNI vs. ACE inhibitor’ belong to?
P
I
C
O
If our patient outcome is ‘hospitalization,’ where does that fit in PICO?
P
I
C
O
If a study is randomized but has 40% loss to follow-up, which pillar does that threaten most?
Validity
Results
Applicability
Demonstration
If a trial finds a benefit, but it only studied young athletes, which pillar is most in question?”
Validity
Applicability
Results
Demonstration
If a 95% CI crosses 1.0 for RR, what does that mean about statistical significance?
It means the effect is strong, just not precise
It means the treatment works, but only for 95% of patients
It means the result is highly significant because the CI is very wide
It means the result is not statistically significant because the CI includes the possibility of no effect (RR = 1). We cannot rule out that the true effect might be zero (no difference)
If RR = 0.7, what direction of effect is suggested—benefit or harm?
Benefit. An RR of 0.7 means the treatment group had 30% lower risk of the outcome compared to control
Harm, because it’s less than 1
No effect, because 0.7 is close to 1
It’s unclear, because RR values don’t tell us direction
Turn to your group: in one sentence, what’s the FIRST thing you’ll check in an article to decide if it’s valid?
Develop an Answerable Clinical Question
Related to Treatment Using PICO
You are a second-year resident working at the VA. On the first morning of Rounds, your medical student presents the following patient to you:
The patient is a 63-year-old white man who was admitted with an exacerbation of heart failure. He has a history of past myocardial infarction (MI) and an ejection fraction (EF) by Echo of 25%. He is very adherent and seldom, if ever, misses his medications.
On admission, his medications were furosemide 40 mg po qd, enalapril 20 mg po bid, simvastatin 10 mg po qd and aspirin 325 mg po qd. He usually functions at a NYHA class II level, but he now has had two admissions for heart failure in the past four months. On this admission, he has already been ruled out for MI and remains in sinus rhythm. He has a normal renal function with a creatinine of 0.9. The patient is particularly concerned about staying out of the hospital because he lives alone and has no one to care for his pets or plants. He is very active in his community and is eager to get out of and stay out of the hospital.
The medical student asks you whether the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) would help this man with his heart failure. The student was told by one of her prior residents that ARNI was a good choice for a patient with heart failure. A resident with whom you consulted states that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, such as enalapril, are the gold standard, especially for a 63-year-old man. The medical student and resident both told you they consulted UpToDate, an evidence-based, point-of-care tool, but you believe that to find the best evidence, a search of the primary literature in PubMed is needed. They look to you for guidance.
What is the PICO?
P
I
C
O
What is your answerable question?
In ___________ (P), is a(n) _________ (I) effective, as compared with _________(C) in reducing ____________ (O)?
Were patients randomized?
Was group allocation concealed?
Were Patients in the study groups similar with respect to known prognostic variables?
To what extent was the study blinded?
Was follow-up complete?
Were patients analyzed in the groups to which they were first allocated?
Was the trial stopped early?
Yes
No
What are the results?
How precise was the treatment effect?
Your patient, Sylvie, is a physically active 55-year-old, with type 2 diabetes. She has 25-year-old twin daughters, Andrea and Julia, who are also physically active, who spend much of their free time, when not working in their family’s landscaping business, bicycling and hiking in California’s national parks. While watching Dr. Oz last month, the guest speakers were debating the health benefits of coffee, and Dr. Oz presented data that associated coffee consumption with a reduced type 2 diabetes risk. Sylvie is intrigued, as she knows that type 2 diabetes can be hereditary. Both of her daughters are avid coffee drinkers, although one daughter, Julia, leans more toward decaffeinated coffee. She decides to do some further investigating on the web.
Today, during your appointment with Sylvie, she asks you, her D.O. and primary care physician, if you have heard or read anything about an inverse association of coffee consumption with the risk of type 2 diabetes.
She looks to you for any evidence of this. Sylvie wants her daughters to maintain their health so they can continue to enjoy quality time with family and friends. You offer to search the literature for the best evidence possible, with the hope of finding a recent systematic review or meta-analysis on the topic.
What is the PICO?
P
I
C
O
What is the answerable question?
In _________ (P), does ___________ (I) compared with ___________ (C) reduce ___________ (O)?
What are the Results?
Did the review address a focused clinical question? Why or why not?
Was the search for relevant studies detailed and exhaustive?
Explain your answer.
Was the selection of the studies reproducible?
Explain your answer.
Was the risk of bias of the primary studies assessed?
Explain your answer.
How precise are the results?
How consistent are the results across studies?
What is Heterogeneity?
Was there evidence of publication bias?
What is the overall quality of the evidence by outcome?
