The accused in criminal proceedings has in his favour the rule that criminal laws should be construed liberally in his favor because ______.

After the decision was rendered by the trial court, the accused found a new evidence. What remedy should the accused do based on the new evidence?

The declaration of an accused acknowledging his guilt of the offense charged, or any offense necessarily included therein is ______.

A police officer testifying in court is allowed to refer to his/her notes or memorandum ______.

The constitutional limitation or ex post facto law in the enactment of criminal laws simply shall be applied ______.

Preliminary investigation is a matter, of right when the penalty for the crime committed is ______.

Police officer Jake ARRESTED ace without legal ground and without a warrant. JAKE committed a crime of ______.

The crime committed is punishable by imprisonment of at least 4 years, 2 months, and 1 day. The crime was committed in Metro Manila or Chartered Cities. Where should the complaint be filed in order to initiate the criminal action?

Which of the following is NOT secondary evidence?

What is this rule of evidence which states when the terms of an agreement have been reduced to writing it considered as containing all the terms agreed upon and there can be between the parties and their successors in interest no evidence of the written agreement?

The form of evidence is that subject to the senses of the court is ______ Evidence

The crime committed is punishable by imprisonment of 4 years, 2 months and less. The crime was committed in the province. Where should the complainant filed in order to initiate the criminal action?

Which of the following circumstances makes the evidence incompetent?

A person who is lawfully arrested may be searched for anything

What is the purpose why independent relevant evidence is admitted by courts?

When the person is called to testify in court as an accused, on what matters may the prosecution cross examine the accused?

In order the person accused of a crime should be bound to answer to accusation against him, what should the police officer do?

Venue to criminal cases refers to the place ________.

If a person commits an act or omission which is provided by revised penal code as amended or modified, the crime committed or omitted ________.

Our criminal law may be applied extraterritorially which simply means that ________.

The extrajudicial confession of an accused is sufficient for conviction ________.

Which among the following is NOT considered as authorized person to file the complaint before the municipal trial court?

Which of the following is NOT hearsay?

Ped Xing is chinese citizen who killed Pilipino on board a Philippine commercial vessel on the high seas. Based on the given law situation based on territoriality principle, Philippine criminal law is ________.

26. The act of omission of a person who after hearing or seeing something that requires him/her ________.

The act of admission against interest is called:

Which of the following situations is NOT valid search without a warrant?

HARDEN after trial was found guilty of a despicable act. However, the court found out that there is no law punishing the said act. May the court punish harden of any penalty which it deemed appropriate?

An act or omission punishable by the revised Penal Code is ________.

When search and seizure conducted by the police is based on a search warrant, this presupposes that the search and seizure ________.

JAKE was convicted for several crimes; Homicides, the penalty imposes is minimum of 6 years and 1 day to 6 years and 1 day to 8 years; Physical injuries, the penalty imposes of 4 year and 1 day to 6 years; and Parricide, the penalty is reclusion Perpetua; JAKE should serve successive service of sentence by serving first the penalty of ________.

What is this right that the accused may invoke during trial to avoid statement against himself?

The power or authority to hear and decide a cases is ________.

The reading of the decision of the court convicting the accused appears to be NOT based on evidence on record or applicable law. What remedy should the accused do in the hope that the court may reversed its decision?

In arbitrary detention it is requires that the offender must be a ________.

The venue to hear criminal cases may be change when the ________.

When a Pilipino kills a Chinese on board a vessel hearing flag of Mexico while the vessel is in the Philippine water, may the criminal law of the Philippines apply?

If the crime is committed in the province and the penalty thereof is one that does NOT acquire preliminary investigation, the complainant shall be filled ________.

To produce conviction, the extra judicial confession must be supported by ________.

Which of the following are not among the exceptions to the hearsay evidence?

The following are element of frustrated stage in the commission of the crime EXCEPT _________.

The accused with the lewd design brought the woman who is minor in a secluded place but with the consent of the latter. The accused is liable for the crime of.

Rebellion and coup de ‘etat when committed by military personnel will subject them to court martial proceedings. What is the NATURE of court martial proceedings?

The process required to determine probable cause based on direct filing of a complaint so that the information may be filed in court is _________?

During arraignment, the accused is required to enter his plea. So that the accused may be intelligently understands the consequences of his plea, what is the mandatory requirement in entering the plea?

Mistake of facts is distinguished from mistake in identity in that mistake of fact the _____

When a crime is committed on board a US warship while it is on Philippines water, the _____

The person who was arrest without warrant for the crime of penalty of which is imprisonment of at least 4 years, 2 months and 1 day. He asked for preliminary investigation may be conducted?

When the case is filed in this court, bail become a matter of right before or after conviction which court is it?

ACE is a police officer. He arrested JAKE without a warrant for a crime which is considered a less grave offense. For ACE to be NOT liable for judicial authorities within _____ from the time of the arrest.

The police officer testifying in court can refer to his/her notes or memorandum _________.

The crime committed when a person killed his/her illegitimate daughter who is minor under the circumstances provided by article 247 is _________.

The constitutional limitation of bill of attainder in the enactment of criminal laws simply means that our criminal law shall _________.

54. The prosecution shall offer in evidence its documentary evidence ___________.

At any time the prosecution may deep proper at its discretion to offer

The crime of adultery is committed by any married woman who shall ________.

Because the burden of proof rests with the prosecution, the duty the convicted the person belongs to these ________.

The new and independent act which is the immediate cause of the injury. Which breaks the connection between the original wrong and the injury is referred to as the ________ causes.

LINO saw ACE with an angry expression on his face while holding FIREARM moving toward his direction. When ACE was already him, LINO picked up a 2x2 hard wood and hit ACE on both his arms, resulting injuries to the latter. It was revealed during the investigation that physical injuries, this situation fits principle of ________.

Which of the following illustration BEST EXEMPLIFIES the concept of complex crimes?

Exclusion of evidence simply means ________.

A person who committing act in violation of a special penal law is committing ________.

What is this STAGE in court proceedings where the prosecution and the accused may agree on matters that will promote a fair and expeditious trial of the cases?

A Filipino killed a Chinese on board a vessel bearing the flag of Mexico while the vessel is in the Philippine territorial waters, should the criminal law of the Philippine apply?

A police officer testifying before the court is allowed to refer to his/her memorandum respecting a matter of ________.

They place commission of the crime is a consideration to determine the ________.

The party is deemed to have rested its case ________.

What is the form of evidence consisting of letters, symbols, number or any inscription?

The following source of criminal law EXCEPT

Conclusive presumption is also known as “presumption juris et de jure”; disputable presumption is

The questioning initiated by enforcement authorities after a person is taken into custody or otherwise deprived of freedom of action is

The authority to enact national penal statutes is lodged in the

From the foregoing situation, suppose that DURANT has personal knowledge of the crime committed. However, DURANT has been previously convicted for the crime robbery, Which of the following statements BEST describes the qualification of DURANT as a witness?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that DURANT is merely 6 years old, Which of the following statement’s BEST describes the qualification of DURANT as a witness?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that DURANT merely heard from KERR the information that it was CURRY who killed NANCE. Which of the following statement below CORRECTLY describes the admissibility of DURANT’s testimony?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that DURANT merely heard from the KERR the information that was JAMES who killed NANCE. Which of the statement below correctly describes the admissibility of DURANT’s testimony?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that WALDO ignores the authority of PO3 CARDO. The latter reacted by angrily staring at WALDO staring at WALDO draws his firearms but without pointing it to waldo. Which of the following crime say PO3 CARDO be liable?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that PO3 CARDO draws his firearm and discharged it in the air because he saw WALDO draw running away from the area of the incident. Which of the following crime PO3 CARDO be liable?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that PO3 CARDO draw his firearm, points it to WALDO, discharged it without intent to kill WALDO, and without hitting WALDO. Which of the following crime may PO3 CARDO be liable?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that PO3 CARDO points the firearm to WALDO and discharge it but without intent to kill. It did not hit nor suffered a fatal injury but survived. Which of the following crime is PO3 CARDO liable?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that LEILA a very influential private individual arranged with FRANKLIN and JONEL the escape PETER in exchange for certain consideration, PETER indeed escape. Which of the following crime is may be committed FRANKLIN AND JONEL?

From the foregoing situation, supposed that PETER escaped from PAKULO though his own efforts without giving consideration to FRANKLIN and JONEL. Did PETER commit any crime?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that JAYBEE escaped though his own efforts from PAKULO without giving consideration to FRANKLIN and JONEL. What is the crime committed FRANKLIN and JONEL?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that JAYBEE escaped though his own efforts from PAKULO without giving consideration to FRANKLIN and JONEL. Did JAYBEE commit any crime?

From the foregoing situation, what is the effect of Hipolito’s remaining silent while being interviewed by the police in connection with crime committed?

From the foregoing situation, which of the following is the reason why Hipolito may or may not remained silent?

From the foregoing situation, when should be Hipolito be informed of Miranda Rights?

From the foregoing situation, jurisprudence declares that the suspect may waive his right to remain silent under the following, EXCEPT it must be _____

From the foregoing situation, suppose that while in the performance of his officer, Pinonu committed as an act punishable under the Philippine penal laws, the characteristics of criminal law to be applied should be _______.

89. From the foregoing situation, suppose that Pinonu is a Japanese and the ambassador of Japan to the Philippines. Outside the performance of his public officer, Pinonu committed an act. What is his status under Philippine law?

From the situation which is punishable under the Philippine law, the characteristics of criminal law to be applied should be:

From the foregoing situation, suppose that ambassador Pinuno committed an act which under the law of Japan is considered as penal, can the government of Japan prosecute Pinuno?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that Pinuno is just ordinary embassy employee in Japan. He committed a crime in connection with performance of his official function. The act complained of if not punishable at the time it was committed. Under our penal system, the applicable characteristic of criminal law is ________.

From the foregoing situation, suppose that HIPOLITO in the commission of the crime of murder against ERIKA ensured that ERIKA cannot retaliate or cause harm against the former, What is the applicable modifying circumstances?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that HIPOLITO used the presence of 4 of his relative to ensured that ERIKA cannot retaliate or cause harm against HIPOLITO at the time he inflicted physical injuries against ERIKA, What is the applicable modifying circumstances?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that Erika is woman. HIPOLITO took advantage of his position as he is also a police officer that will of ERIKA. What is the applicable modifying circumstances?

From the foregoing situation, suppose that despite due diligence and without intention to commit a crime, and without fault, the act of HIPOLITO resulted to physical injuries against the person of ERIKA. What is the applicable modifying circumstances?

In an extra-judicial confession executed before the NBI, A charged with murder, voluntarily admitted the charge but implicated B & C as his co-conspirators. Apprehended, B & C vehemently denied the charge, after the conduct of preliminary investigation, A, B & C was charged in court of murder. During the trial, counsel of B & C vigorously objected to A’s testimony in court implicating his co-accused. Is the testimony of A in court admissible? Decide.

A group of 3 persons, A, B & C robbed a house. When they were feeling after the robbery, they were intercepted by the police and as a result A was mortally wounded. Before he died, but conscious of his impending death, “A” admitted participating in the robbery, and named B and C as his companions. Hence, B & C were charged for the death of the policeman? What is the nature of the declaration of A? Decide.