

Voidable Contracts and Remedies
Flashcard
•
Social Studies
•
11th - 12th Grade
•
Easy
Wayground Content
Used 1+ times
FREE Resource
Student preview

9 questions
Show all answers
1.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
Intent and negotiation are aspects of which contract requirements?
Back
offer & acceptance
2.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
The "things of value" that must be exchanged in order for a contract to be legal are called the...
Back
consideration
3.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
The ability for a person to even enter into a legal contract is called...
Back
capacity
4.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
Clear, timely and honest communication is a necessary aspect of which parts of a contract?
Back
all of these
5.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
Fraud, misrepresentation, mistake, duress and undue influence all could mean...
Back
a contract is invalid even though it meets the 6 requirements
6.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
Which of the following is true of a fraud lawsuit? it can only be for the value of the injury caused by the fraud, the court will allow the plaintiff more than the value of the damage caused by the fraud in order to discourage fraud in society as a whole, it so weakens society that you don't even need to have a trial, just tell the police, it can happen by accident
Back
the court will allow the plaintiff more than the value of the damage caused by the fraud in order to discourage fraud in society as a whole
7.
FLASHCARD QUESTION
Front
Which of the following situations could be a legitimate case for a fraud lawsuit? a person sells you a piece of jewelry they truly believe belonged to a famous person, but you find out, after you bought it, it really didn't; a person sells you a piece of jewelry that really did belong to a famous person, but makes up a story about what the piece of jewelry meant to that famous person; a person sells you a piece of jewelry that they have told other people lies about, but they did not tell those lies to you when they sold it to you and you never heard the lies; a person tells you a lie about who owned a piece of jewelry, but all you care about is the quality of the piece, not who owned it; a person sells you a piece of jewelry they lied about, you bought it because of the lie, but when you have it appraised you find out that you didn't pay any more for it because of the lie.
Back
a person sells you a piece of jewelry that really did belong to a famous person, but makes up a story about what the piece of jewelry meant to that famous person.
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?