321 Presentation Training P1

Multiple Choice

What is GOOOOD about the design of this group's first slide?

• The choice of professional attire for the presenters enhances credibility and aligns well with the formal tone of the presentation

• Faces and names (order of presenters) are clearly visible for the audience to track and write down in the feedback form at the start

• The alignment of text and images demonstrates a professional design, showcasing attention to detail in layout.

• The slide title, "AI FACE ON," paired with the date, effectively sets the tone and creates anticipation for the presentation.

Multiple Choice

What is LESS IDEAL about the design of this group's first slide?

(especially when it is a presentation at the beginning of the semester?)

• The choice of professional attire for the presenters enhances credibility and aligns well with the formal tone of the presentation

• Some faces are too small (with some members pouting their mouths) making it hard for the audience to track and write down in the feedback form at the start

• The lack of additional information about the presenters, such as their roles or contributions, leaves the audience uninformed

• The use of individual photo frames creates unnecessary visual separation, making the slide feel disconnected.

Multiple Choice

What is the problem with the design of this slide?

• Too much text without focus or journey path / storytelling indication

• The color scheme is too vibrant and distracting.
• The icons and books in the corners are unnecessary and do not add value to the content.

• The design is overly simplistic and lacks detail.

Multiple Choice

What is the ONE good thing about the design of this slide?

• There is much text, but readers are not required to read. There is a central focus: keyword at the bottom to show what the presenter means

• The slide uses visuals and graphics effectively to enhance engagement

• Text is evenly distributed, ensuring that all sections get equal attention

• The color gradient at the bottom aligns perfectly with the theme

Multiple Choice

What is the problem with the design of this slide?

• All full sentences, it is hard to track the ideas, no quick way to see which one is winning

• The color scheme is too vibrant and distracting.
• The design is cluttered and lacks clear visual hierarchy.
• The design is overly simplistic and lacks detail.

Multiple Choice

What is GOOD about the design of this slide? Choose the best option

• All full sentences, it is easy to track the ideas.

• The color scheme is vibrant and less distracting.

• There is a clear flow of ideas

• The design is clean and simple.

Multiple Select

What is GOOD about the design of this slide? Choose 2 correct answers

• Including this brainstorming stage demonstrates advanced expertise and deliberate intention in crafting prompts, highlighting an understanding of structured input for AI

• Clean, simple and effective. Minimal text and keyword-based labeling to deliver a concise and focused message

• The slide uses fancy terminology and extra visual appeal

• The design lacks visual appeal, as the color-coded elements are inconsistent

Multiple Choice

What is the ONE good thing about the design of this slide? Choose the best answer.

• There is much text, but readers are not required to read. There is a central focus: keyword at the bottom to show what the presenter means

• The slide uses visuals and graphics effectively to enhance engagement

• Text is evenly distributed, ensuring that all sections get equal attention

• The color gradient at the bottom aligns perfectly with the theme

Multiple Select

What is BAD about the design of this slide? Choose 2 options that best answer the question.

• Although this is supposed to be a comparison of 3 tools, there is no quick way to see which one is winning. It takes a lot of time to read.

• All full sentences, keywords are not highlighted

• The slide uses inconsistent font sizes, which affects the overall readability

• The visual elements, such as arrows and tape graphics, are overwhelming and detract from the main message

Multiple Select

What is MISSING in the design of this slide? Choose 2 answers that apply.

• Although this is supposed to be a comparison of 3 tools, there is no quick way to see which one is winning

• All full sentences, keywords are not highlighted

• The slide uses inconsistent font sizes, which affects the overall readability

• The visual elements, such as arrows and tape graphics, are overwhelming and detract from the main message

Multiple Select

What is MISSING in the design of this slide? Choose 3 answers that apply.

• Although this is supposed to be a comparison of 3 tools, there is no quick way to see which one is winning

• All full sentences, keywords are not highlighted

• Takeaway lesson is supposed to draw recommendations about when to use which tool, not just "opinions"

• The visual elements, such as arrows and tape graphics, are overwhelming and detract from the main message

Multiple Select

What is MISSING in the takeaway?

• The takeaway is too generic, predictable, and lacks depth or actionable insights

• It doesn't provide any novel, memorable or specific strategies that the audience can implement. Feel like a shallow summary

• Takeaway lesson is supposed to draw recommendations about when to use which tool, not just "opinions" or moral lessons

• The visuals (light bulb, calendar, and sticky note) do not align with the textual message

Multiple Select

What is MISSING in the design of this slide? Choose 3 answers that apply.

• The text formatting is inconsistent, making the slide difficult to follow

• All full sentences, keywords are not highlighted

• The images are unnecessary and do not contribute to understanding the prompts or comparison.

• Not clear why 3 different prompts were used for the same task. Supposed to be a fair comparison

Multiple Select

What is MISSING in the takeaway?

• The takeaway is too generic, predictable, and lacks depth or actionable insights

• It doesn't provide any novel, memorable or specific strategies that the audience can implement. Feel like a shallow summary

• Takeaway lesson is supposed to draw recommendations about when to use which tool, not just "opinions" or moral lessons

• The visuals (light bulb, calendar, and sticky note) do not align with the textual message