Tzedakah review

According to the Rambam's count, which mitzvos directly relate to giving money to poor people?

• open your hand, support him to be self-sufficient
• don't harden your heart and pull your hand away
• Give loans to the poor
• all three

According to the Rambam, which mitzvah is the greatest form of helping poor people?

• open your hand, support him
• don't harden your heart and pull your hand away
• Give loans to the poor
• all three

According to the Rambam, which kind of tzedakah is the greatest form of tzedakah?

• giving a loan/job/gift so he won't need a handout
• giving the money before he asks
• neither the giver or receiver knows whom the other is
• all three

According to the Rambam, which kind of tzedakah doesn't get you any reward?

• money given in a negative/belittling way
• giving the money after he asks
• both the giver or receiver knows whom the other is
• all three

Based on Chazal, from the phrase ״דֵּי מַחְסוֹרוֹ״, enough for what he's lacking, we learn that:

• you can't turn away an עָנִי empty-handed
• we make up the deficits of the עָנִי,
• give him whatever he misses
• all of the above

Based on Chazal, from the phrase ״אֲשֶׁר יֶחְסַר לוֹ״, which is missing to him, we learn that:

• you can't turn away an עָנִי empty-handed
• we must support the עָנִי,
• give him whatever he's missing
• all of the above

The story with Hillel going so far as to run in front of the horse is an example of:

• not being hard-hearted
• opening your hand
• giving enough to make up his deficit
• giving the עָנִי what he, personally, is missing

We find two opinions regarding how much an individual is obligated to give. The Shulchan Aruch says:

• that thoroughly supporting the עָנִי is a collective obligation
• that thoroughly supporting the עָנִי is an individual obligation
• depends on the individual wealth
• depends on the abilities of the עָנִי

We find two opinions regarding how much an individual is obligated to give. Many poskim say:

• that thoroughly supporting the עָנִי is a collective obligation
• that thoroughly supporting the עָנִי is an individual obligation
• depends on the individual wealth
• depends on the abilities of the עָנִי

Doesn't the story with Hillel prove that supporting the עָנִי is an individual obligation?

• Maybe Hillel's conduct was a מִדַת חַסִידוּת
• Maybe Hillel's community didn't have the money for that support
• It was a machlokes Beish Hillel/Beis Shammai
• all of the above