Search Header Logo

Toulmin Argumentative Method Quiz

Authored by Rayan Alaoui

English

12th Grade

Used 1+ times

Toulmin Argumentative Method Quiz
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

9 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What are the three fundamental parts of a Toulmin argument?

Qualifier, Rebuttal, Claim

Claim, Grounds, Warrant, Backing

Qualifier, Rebuttal, Backing, Grounds

Claim, Grounds, Warrant

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the purpose of the qualifier in a Toulmin argument?

To provide additional support for the warrant

To build credibility

To acknowledge another valid view of the situation

To show that a claim may not be true in all circumstances

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which component of a Toulmin argument is the assertion that authors would like to prove to their audience?

Warrant

Grounds

Qualifier

Claim

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the role of the backing in a Toulmin argument?

To provide additional support for the warrant

To acknowledge another valid view of the situation

To show that a claim may not be true in all circumstances

To build credibility

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which part of a Toulmin argument is the assumption that links the grounds to the claim?

Backing

Warrant

Rebuttal

Qualifier

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the purpose of the rebuttal in a Toulmin argument?

To show that a claim may not be true in all circumstances

To build credibility

To provide additional support for the warrant

To acknowledge another valid view of the situation

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the sentence pattern recommended for writing a good argument sentence in Toulmin method?

Because of this supporting point (reasoning plus evidence), my fittingly qualified claim makes sense, especially when you consider this warrant (principle), which is backed by this evidence; while a particular objection might be made, additional reasoning rebuts it.

Because of this supporting point (reasoning plus evidence), my fittingly qualified claim makes sense, especially when you consider this warrant (principle), which is backed by this evidence; while a particular objection might be made, additional reasoning supports it.

Because of this supporting point (reasoning plus evidence), my fittingly qualified claim makes sense, especially when you consider this warrant (principle), which is backed by this evidence; while a particular objection might be made, additional reasoning ignores it.

Because of this supporting point (reasoning plus evidence), my fittingly qualified claim makes sense, especially when you consider this warrant (principle), which is backed by this evidence; while a particular objection might be made, additional reasoning accepts it.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?