
The SCOTUS 14 - Districting & Representation
Authored by Jason Valentine
Social Studies
11th Grade
Used 2+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
6 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What was the main issue in Baker v. Carr (1962)?
Does SCOTUS have the authority to hear a case involving a state redrawing its legislative districts?
Can legislative districts that are drawn along racial lines be challenged in court?
Can Congress use the Commerce Clause to regulate handguns on school campuses?
Does a felony defendant in a state court have a right to legal counsel?
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
In Baker v. Carr (1962), what constitutional principle was used to show SCOTUS had the authority to hear a case involving legislative reapportionment?
Equal Protection Clause
First Amendment
Second Amendment
Due Process Clause
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What was a key impact of the Shaw v. Reno (1993) case?
Majority-minority legislative districts can be constitutionally challenged if race was the sole factor in their creation.
It legalized racial gerrymandering.
It banned all forms of gerrymandering.
It established new voting districts.
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Who authored the majority opinion in Shaw v. Reno?
Sandra Day O'Connor
Thurgood Marshall
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Antonin Scalia
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
The Shaw v. Reno case involved residents from which state?
North Carolina
South Carolina
Georgia
Virginia
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Which one is an accurate comparison of Baker v. Carr (1961) and Shaw v. Reno (1993)?
BAKER V. CARR (1961): Ruled that rural voters had to be represented proportionally to urban voters. / SHAW V. RENO (1993): Ruled that gerrymandered districts were legal.
BAKER V. CARR (1961): Established the "one person one vote" doctrine / SHAW V. RENO (1993): Declared majority-minority districts unconstitutional
BAKER V. CARR (1961): Allowed state legislatures to gerrymander districts / SHAW V. RENO (1993): Ruled that race-based voting was not different than race-based hiring
BAKER V. CARR (1961): Violated separation of powers doctrine between state legislatures and the courts / SHAW V. RENO (1993): Ruled the Voting Rights Act was constitutional
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?