Search Header Logo

The SCOTUS 14 - Districting & Representation

Authored by Jason Valentine

Social Studies

11th Grade

Used 2+ times

The SCOTUS 14 - Districting & Representation
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

6 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main issue in Baker v. Carr (1962)?

Does SCOTUS have the authority to hear a case involving a state redrawing its legislative districts?

Can legislative districts that are drawn along racial lines be challenged in court?

Can Congress use the Commerce Clause to regulate handguns on school campuses?

Does a felony defendant in a state court have a right to legal counsel?

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In Baker v. Carr (1962), what constitutional principle was used to show SCOTUS had the authority to hear a case involving legislative reapportionment?

Equal Protection Clause

First Amendment

Second Amendment

Due Process Clause

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was a key impact of the Shaw v. Reno (1993) case?

Majority-minority legislative districts can be constitutionally challenged if race was the sole factor in their creation.

It legalized racial gerrymandering.

It banned all forms of gerrymandering.

It established new voting districts.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who authored the majority opinion in Shaw v. Reno?

Sandra Day O'Connor

Thurgood Marshall

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Antonin Scalia

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The Shaw v. Reno case involved residents from which state?

North Carolina

South Carolina

Georgia

Virginia

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which one is an accurate comparison of Baker v. Carr (1961) and Shaw v. Reno (1993)?


BAKER V. CARR (1961): Ruled that rural voters had to be represented proportionally to urban voters. / SHAW V. RENO (1993): Ruled that gerrymandered districts were legal.


BAKER V. CARR (1961): Established the "one person one vote" doctrine / SHAW V. RENO (1993): Declared majority-minority districts unconstitutional


BAKER V. CARR (1961): Allowed state legislatures to gerrymander districts / SHAW V. RENO (1993): Ruled that race-based voting was not different than race-based hiring


BAKER V. CARR (1961): Violated separation of powers doctrine between state legislatures and the courts / SHAW V. RENO (1993): Ruled the Voting Rights Act was constitutional


Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?