What are the potential consequences of ethical dilemmas in AI decision-making on society?

• Ethical dilemmas in AI can lead to significant societal impacts.

• AI decision-making is inherently ethical and poses no dilemmas.

• There are no societal consequences of ethical dilemmas in AI.

• AI decision-making only results in beneficial outcomes for society.

• AI decision-making involves ethical dilemmas that may impact real-world scenarios or not.

Explain the role of opportunity cost, utility maximization, and externalities in AI-driven choices. How do these economic concepts influence decision-making?

• Opportunity cost, utility maximization, and externalities are irrelevant in AI-driven choices.

• These concepts help in understanding the trade-offs, benefits, and unintended consequences in AI decision-making.

• AI-driven choices are only influenced by technological factors, not economic concepts.

• Economic concepts like opportunity cost and utility maximization are outdated in the context of AI.

Evaluate the 2015 study on autonomous vehicles (Bonnefon, Shariff, & Rahwan) and its implications for ethical and economic decision-making. What are the key findings of this study?

• The study highlights the ethical dilemmas faced by autonomous vehicles in decision-making scenarios.

• The study focuses on the technological advancements in autonomous vehicle sensors.

• The study discusses the economic benefits of autonomous vehicles in reducing traffic congestion.

• The study examines the impact of autonomous vehicles on urban planning.

According to the 2015 study on autonomous vehicles (Bonnefon, Shariff, & Rahwan), would most people buy a self-driving car if it could choose to sacrifice them in a life-or-death situation to save more people?

• Yes, they would buy it.

• No, they would not buy it.

CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY. If governments mandate that all autonomous vehicles (AVs) follow the same ethical rules, what are the potential market implications?

• A) It could lead to increased compliance costs, potentially reducing competition in the AV market.

• B) Standardizing ethical rules might improve public trust in AVs, encouraging wider adoption.

• C) Companies would have more freedom to develop diverse AV decision-making algorithms, increasing consumer choice.

• D) Mandating uniform ethics would encourage more firms to enter the AV market, boosting competition.

• E) The regulation would eliminate all risks associated with AV decision-making, making accidents obsolete.

If consumers won’t buy AVs programmed for ethical decisions, how should companies respond?

• By ignoring consumer preferences

• By re-evaluating their programming approach

• By increasing marketing efforts

• By lowering the price of AVs

Should ethics be dictated by markets or governments?

• Ethics should be dictated by markets.

• Ethics should be dictated by governments.

• Ethics should be dictated by both markets and governments.

• Ethics should not be dictated by either markets or governments.

Answer explanation

Ethics should not be dictated solely by markets or governments. Instead, collaborative governance—where markets innovate within democratically set ethical boundaries—offers a sustainable path. This ensures competition fosters progress while regulations safeguard collective values like equity, transparency, and human dignity

In the context of consumer preferences for self-preserving autonomous vehicles (AVs), which of the following statements accurately reflects the dynamics between market pressures, ethical concerns, and regulatory interventions?

• A) Companies are likely to prioritize self-preserving algorithms for AVs solely based on consumer demand, regardless of ethical implications.

• B) A hybrid approach that balances self-preservation and harm minimization in AV programming could align consumer preferences with societal ethics.

• C) Strict regulations mandating utilitarian programming for AVs would likely increase consumer trust and accelerate the adoption of autonomous technology.

• D) Relying solely on consumer choices to enforce ethical standards in AV programming is sufficient to ensure public safety and moral responsibility.

What happens to market efficiency when consumers’ personal preferences conflict with collective safety?

• Market efficiency improves

• Market efficiency declines

• Market efficiency remains unchanged

• Market efficiency becomes unpredictable

If companies compete, what might happen to the AV market?

• Companies might create safer AVs to satisfy demand.

• Companies might create riskier AVs to satisfy demand, leading to a race to the bottom.

• Companies might not change their AVs to satisfy demand.

• Companies might create more expensive AVs to increase supply, according to the law of supply.