CLEAN : Violence scuppers hopes of resolving Hong Kong standoff

The speaker discusses the legality of public protests in Hong Kong, emphasizing that protests should not lead to illegal occupation of public spaces. They address accusations of being paid by the Chinese government, clarifying that neither they nor the townspeople are influenced by external payments. The speaker criticizes the media's portrayal of the movement and the labeling of protests, suggesting it gives the police a reason to suppress them. Finally, they condemn the police's actions against protesters, highlighting the involvement of gangsters and Triad members allegedly supported by the police.

What does the speaker believe about the occupation of public places in Hong Kong?

• It is a right of every citizen.

• It should be done only with government permission.

• It is acceptable if it is for a good cause.

• It should not happen as it leads to anarchy.

What does the speaker imply about the future of Hong Kong if the current situation continues?

• Hong Kong will thrive.

• Hong Kong will face economic challenges.

• Hong Kong will die.

• Hong Kong will become more democratic.

How does the speaker respond to claims of being paid by the Chinese government?

• They admit to receiving payments.

• They suggest others are being paid instead.

• They deny any payments and claim to be just a townspeople.

• They refuse to comment on the matter.

What is the speaker's view on the labeling of their movement?

• It is a tactic to justify police actions.

• It is irrelevant to their cause.

• It is a fair assessment.

• It is a misunderstanding.

What does the speaker suggest about the police's actions in Mongkok?

• The police were unaware of the events.

• The police were supported by gangsters.

• The police acted appropriately.

• The police were neutral in the situation.