Greycroft’s Sigalow Says Snap Was Under-Priced at $17

Greycroft’s Sigalow Says Snap Was Under-Priced at $17

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Information Technology (IT), Architecture

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses Snapchat's initial stock valuation at $17.00, perceived as underpriced by some due to its monetization potential. It highlights Snapchat's low revenue per user compared to other mobile apps and its untapped advertising and in-app purchase opportunities. The competition with Instagram is noted, with both platforms targeting similar demographics. The discussion also covers investment decisions, including a past $3 billion offer from Facebook, and the unique growth of Snapchat outside San Francisco, challenging conventional venture capital beliefs.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the initial public offering (IPO) price of Snapchat, and how was it perceived by some investors?

$25.00, considered overpriced

$20.00, considered fair

$17.00, considered underpriced

$10.00, considered overpriced

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does Snapchat's average revenue per daily active user compare to typical mobile app companies?

It is about one-tenth

It is about the same

It is double

It is half

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main competitive challenge Snapchat faces against Instagram?

The battle for the same user demographic

Instagram's larger user base

Instagram's superior advertising strategy

Snapchat's lack of features

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What potential user demographic expansion could Snapchat achieve?

From millennials to Generation X and Y

From Generation Y to Generation Z

From millennials to Generation Z

From Generation X to millennials

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the venture capital industry's belief about tech companies like Snapchat?

They need to be in Southern California

They can't succeed outside of San Francisco

They should be based in New York

They should focus on hardware