Gibbons vs Ogden Explained in 5 Minutes (1824): US History Review

Gibbons vs Ogden Explained in 5 Minutes (1824): US History Review

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies

6th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the landmark Supreme Court case Gibbons vs. Ogden (1824), which addressed the balance of power between state and federal governments. The case involved a dispute over steamboat navigation rights, with Gibbons holding a federal license and Ogden a state license. The court, led by John Marshall, ruled in favor of Gibbons, emphasizing the federal government's authority under the Interstate Commerce Clause. This decision significantly expanded federal power and set a precedent for future commerce regulation.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What year did the Gibbons vs. Ogden case take place?

1832

1824

1850

1804

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who were the two main individuals involved in the Gibbons vs. Ogden case?

Robert Fulton and Aaron Ogden

Robert Livingston and Gibbons

Aaron Ogden and Gibbons

John Marshall and Aaron Ogden

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main legal issue in the Gibbons vs. Ogden case?

Taxation laws

Land ownership

State vs. Federal authority

Voting rights

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which clause of the U.S. Constitution was central to the Gibbons vs. Ogden case?

Necessary and Proper Clause

Equal Protection Clause

Interstate Commerce Clause

Supremacy Clause

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who argued for the federal government's side in the Gibbons vs. Ogden case?

John Marshall

Aaron Ogden

Daniel Webster

Robert Fulton

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of the Gibbons vs. Ogden case?

It ended in a tie

Gibbons won

Ogden won

The case was dismissed

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the Gibbons vs. Ogden case affect federal power?

It abolished federal power

It had no effect

It expanded federal power

It limited federal power