CLEAN : "Images rarely count as defining evidence" of war crimes says expert

The video discusses the complexities of gathering evidence in conflict zones, emphasizing the limitations of images as standalone evidence. It highlights the need for caution in war reporting and the role of satellite imagery in journalism. The challenges of attributing responsibility for war crimes are also explored, with a focus on the potential for future indictments.

Why is it important to have additional information alongside images in war reporting?

• Images are too expensive to produce.

• Images are not allowed in court.

• Images are always accurate.

• Images alone can be misleading.

What does the example of Timisoara illustrate about initial narratives?

• They are based on facts.

• They can be misleading.

• They are not important.

• They are always accurate.

What is a key element in determining the truth in conflict zones?

• The popularity of the news outlet.

• The speed of reporting.

• The use of satellite imagery.

• The number of journalists present.

What is a challenge in attributing responsibility for war crimes?

• Lack of evidence.

• Identifying specific individuals responsible.

• Overabundance of clear information.

• Too many witnesses.

What might future indictments depend on according to the discussion?

• Public opinion.

• Thorough investigation and evidence.

• Media coverage.

• Political pressure.