Mapp v. Ohio: Illegal Search and Seizure

The video discusses the importance of warrants in protecting privacy, focusing on the landmark case of Mapp v Ohio. It traces the historical context of the 4th Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches. The case arose when police entered Dolre Mapp's home without a warrant, leading to her conviction based on illegally obtained evidence. Mapp appealed, and the Supreme Court ruled that such evidence is inadmissible in state courts, reinforcing the exclusionary rule. This decision emphasized the protection of individual rights against unlawful searches.

What precedent was set by the Supreme Court ruling in Mapp v. Ohio?

In your opinion, what is more important: society's need for security or individual rights?