Impact of the Bold Decision

The Boldt Decision, a landmark ruling in 1974, affirmed Native American treaty rights to fish in Washington State, making tribes co-managers of fisheries. This decision, rooted in treaties from the 1850s, was a turning point for Native American rights, leading to protests and legal battles. It has had lasting impacts on tribal-state relations, salmon management, and environmental law, influencing international indigenous rights cases.

What is the significance of the Bold Decision in environmental documentation?

• It is the least powerful document.

• It is only important internationally.

• It is a significant environmental document.

• It has no impact on Washington state.

What was the role of Judge George Bold in the Bold Decision?

• He was not involved in the case.

• He ruled in favor of the state.

• He upheld Native American fishing rights.

• He opposed the decision.

What rights did the treaties in the mid-1800s reserve for Native American tribes?

• The right to vote.

• The right to hunt and fish.

• The right to free education.

• The right to own land.

What was a major factor leading to the Bold Decision?

• A new fishing technology.

• A decline in fish population.

• Protests and legal actions by Native Americans.

• Increased taxes on fishing.

What was a key reason for the protests leading to the Bold Decision?

• Introduction of fishing taxes.

• A decline in fish population.

• A new fishing law.

• Violation of treaty rights.

What was one of the outcomes of the Bold Decision?

• Fishing was banned in Washington state.

• Co-management of fisheries was established.

• Fisheries were solely managed by the state.

• Native Americans lost fishing rights.

What was the reaction of non-Indians to the Bold Decision?

• They were indifferent.

• They protested against it.

• They celebrated the decision.

• They immediately accepted it.

What process was created to manage salmon after the Bold Decision?

• The Pacific Fishery Management Council.

• The Atlantic Fishery Management Council.

• The European Fishery Management Council.

• The Global Fishery Management Council.

How did the Bold Decision influence international indigenous rights?

• It led to the end of indigenous rights.

• It was only relevant to the United States.

• It inspired legal actions in Canada and Australia.

• It had no international impact.

What was the impact of the Bold Decision on shellfish harvesting?

• It had no impact on shellfish.

• It restricted harvesting to public lands.

• It allowed harvesting on private lands.

• It banned shellfish harvesting.