Trophy Hunting in Tajikistan

The video discusses the complex issues surrounding trophy hunting, contrasting it with food hunting. It highlights the emotional and ethical concerns people have, especially regarding endangered species. Public opinion in the U.S. generally supports hunting for food, with some vegans also finding it ethically acceptable. The video explores a case in Tajikistan where trophy hunting has contributed to conservation efforts, despite potential corruption. The economic benefits for local communities and the ethical implications of such practices are also examined.

What is a common emotional reaction people have towards trophy hunting?

• Hostility

• Curiosity

• Excitement

• Indifference

What percentage of Americans support hunting for food?

• 50%

• 80%

• 60%

• 70%

Why might some vegans support hunting?

• They are against all forms of animal consumption

• They want to try new diets

• They see it as more ethical than factory farming

• They enjoy the sport

What is a key difference between trophy hunting and food hunting?

• Food hunting is for sport

• Food hunting is illegal

• Trophy hunting is cheaper

• Trophy hunting often targets rare animals

What animal is highlighted in the Tajikistan trophy hunting case study?

• Deer

• Mountain goat

• Tiger

• Elephant

What do hunters typically take home from a trophy hunt?

• Nothing

• The entire animal

• The skin and horns

• Only the meat

How has trophy hunting impacted the mountain goat population in Tajikistan?

• It has decreased

• It has increased

• It has remained the same

• It has become extinct

What is a potential downside of trophy hunting in Tajikistan?

• Lack of interest from hunters

• High levels of corruption

• Overpopulation of species

• Decreased tourism

What is the main motivation for trophy hunting in Tajikistan?

• To obtain a rare trophy

• To enjoy the natural scenery

• To support local businesses

• To provide food for locals

What is a positive outcome of trophy hunting in Tajikistan?

• Increased poaching

• Decreased animal populations

• Improved conservation efforts

• Higher hunting costs