Philosophical Challenges to Knowledge

Philosophical Challenges to Knowledge

Assessment

Interactive Video

Philosophy

11th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Amelia Wright

FREE Resource

The video explores the evolution of the analytic tradition in philosophy, focusing on key figures like Quine, Sellars, Gettier, and Putnam. It discusses the shift from foundationalism to coherentism, critiques of traditional epistemology, and the introduction of naturalism and conceptual relativity. The video highlights the impact of these ideas on the philosophy of science and language, emphasizing the interconnectedness of mind, knowledge, and language.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the primary focus of the analytic tradition as discussed in the introduction?

Historical analysis

Religious studies

Abstract metaphysics

Empirical and scientific focus

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which philosopher is known for critiquing the foundationalist aspect of knowledge?

Willard Quine

Hilary Putnam

Wilfrid Sellars

Edmund Gettier

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What approach did Quine propose for knowledge construction?

Rationalist

Empiricist

Coherentist

Foundationalist

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What term did Wilfrid Sellars use to describe the foundationalist perspective?

The myth of the given

The illusion of truth

The fallacy of certainty

The paradox of knowledge

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which philosophical tradition influenced Sellars' critique of foundationalism?

Logical positivism

Empiricism

Continental phenomenology

Analytic philosophy

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the traditional definition of knowledge that Gettier challenged?

Logical positivism

Rational deduction

Empirical observation

True justified belief

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Gettier's examples demonstrate about the traditional definition of knowledge?

It was universally accepted

It had a systemic flaw

It was logically sound

It was based on empirical evidence

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?