Font size
WorksheetsMOOC 3
Total questions: 202
Worksheet time: 2hrs 55mins
How long is each module?
Six weeks
Three months
1 hour
4 hours
Which of the following are assessed tasks on the Critical Thinking Skills for University Success MOOC?
In video questions
Final summative assessment
Discussion board posts
Longer quizzes after each module
Shorter quizzes after each lesson
Which of the following are learning objectives for this MOOC?
Recognize the importance & function of problem solving & creative thought within academic study.
Identify types of argument, and bias within arguments, in order to better evaluate the strength of arguments.
Apply problem-solving strategies to issues related to university life & study.
Communicate clearly across a variety of different contexts and to a wide range of audiences by adapting communicative styles appropriately according to cultural and societal expectations.
Understand the importance and function of critical thinking in academic culture.
Which of the following are NON-assessed activities on this MOOC?
Final summative assessment
Short quizzes after each lesson
Discussion board posts
Quizzes after each module.
In video questions & polls
What percentage of your total marks is the final summative assessment worth?
5%
15%
50%
35%
What does Professor Phillipa Patterson mean by the contingent nature of knowledge?
It means that knowledge is ongoing.
It means that academic knowledge can’t be altered.
It means that knowledge may change at any time.
Why does Patrick Pheasant compare academic culture to an onion?
Because it has layers.
Because it only tastes good if you prepare it carefully.
Because if you don’t deal with it correctly it will make you cry.
Why does Marcella Robertson say independent learning is a core value of academic culture?
Check one option.
Because no one will help you at university.
Because the onus for learning is usually on the student.
Because you must do your assignments on your own.
According to Adam Bridgeman, how is assessment different at university?
It’s about thinking about facts and expressing your opinion rather than the facts themselves.
There is a lot more memorization involved.
There is a lot more speaking expected of students.
Consider the following statement:
Dogs cannot hold government positions or run for public offices.
Which of the following is an academic response to this statement?
This is certainly true, as dogs are less intelligent than people.
This is certainly true, as dogs are unable to understand the complex workings of government positions.
While it may be the case that in some countries, laws prohibit dogs from running for and holding public office or government positions, it is not true to say that they cannot do so. There are numerous instances of dogs running for and winning government positions, such as Duke The Dog, a seven-year old canine who won the mayoral election in Cormorant, Minnesota in the USA in August 2014 (“Duke The Dog Elected Mayor In Cormorant, Minn.”, August 13, 2014)
Brooke talks about the need for systematic and objective decision-making in a context other than university. Where does she say these skills are also important?
At home
Online
The workplace
How does Tony Cannell characterise critical thinking in commerce and accounting?
Needing to scrutinise the relationship between evidence and claim
Taking existing knowledge to a higher level
Showing that you’ve thought about an idea with the support of others
Which of the following are some of the core values and expectations of academic culture mentioned by academics in 1.2a?
Academic integrity
Freedom
Critical thinking
Intellectual inquiry and communication
Ethical contribution
What metaphor do Molinari and Kavanagh (2013) use to describe critical thinking?
A slippery eel
A proud lion
A lazy sloth
A friendly dog
At university, what is an argument?
An angry disagreement between two people
An attempt to defend, validate or explain a conclusion using specific reasons or evidence
A more polite term for a fight
Another word for a conclusion
What did studying performance studies show Jessica?
Acting on screen
How to teach
Different aspects of looking at the world.
Communicating with others
Which of the following was NOT a way that Jenni said university had changed her?
She learned resilience.
Better people skills
More confidence
Better problem-solving skills
What differences does Vince point out between assessments at high school and assessments at university?
Assessment is easier at university
Assessment is more unstructured at university
At university you need to synthesize and distill sources, unlike high school.
You just need to apply content at university.
How did Amy have to demonstrate critical thinking in her Global Studies course?
She had to assess various theories about Global Studies.
She needed to find the strengths and weaknesses of theories such as Marxism and liberalism
Tailor information to an audience.
Criticize theories about Global Studies.
In lesson 1.3a, Jonathon mentions that he learnt two valuable skills when he struggled to pass a first year university course. What were they?
Resilience
How to ask for help
Curiosity
Flexibility
In lesson 1.3a, why does Ben say he felt comfortable at university?
Because he met lots of new people
Because he was pushed to think in new ways
Because it gave him the confidence to have an opinion
In lesson 1.3b, Jenni contrasts her essay writing and argumentation at the beginning of her university course with the argumentation at the end. What differences did she notice?
At the end of her course, she wrote more about how she felt.
At the end of her course, she wrote longer arguments.
At the end of her time at university, she was able to use references more to support her propositions.
At the end of her course, she made broader, more cohesive arguments.
According to the International Centre for Academic Integrity, which of the following are central values that underpin academic integrity?
Honor
Fairness
Respect
Reconciliation
Honesty
In this situation, would you get in trouble for breaching Academic Integrity? That is, if Paul gets caught handing in the essay you wrote for him, will this impact you?
Yes
No
Who do you think discovered his fraud?
Another well-known academic in his field
A colleague working with him.
The head of the university
Two graduate students
Mohammed is a third year undergraduate student studying epidemiology. His professor is highly regarded in the field and Mohammed is very excited to study under him. While trying to replicate one of his professor’s experiments, Mohammed notices that another student has made a mistake while calculating the data for the experiment. In one of the equations, one of the signs is around the wrong way. This has made the results of the experiment seem really positive. However, when Mohammed does his calculations, he notices that his results aren’t very good at all.
Mohammed does the calculations multiple times. He consults a few other students, and they all come up with the same thing. It isn’t an assignment, and students are allowed to collaborate and work together, so Mohammed tells the student about the mistake. However, the other student shrugs and refuses to change it because it is the same as the one used in the original paper.
What is Mohammed required to do?
Mohammed isn’t required to do anything.
He must tell the professor because the student is falsifying his/her results.
He must go to the dean of the faculty and accuse the other student of academic misconduct.
Consider the following situation.
Mohammed is a third year undergraduate student studying epidemiology. His professor is highly regarded in the field and Mohammed is very excited to study under him. However, after seeing another student use an incorrect equation while trying to replicate one of his professor’s experiments, Mohammed notices that his professor made a small error when calculating the data for the original experiment. When Mohammed fixes the error, it changes the results so much that the conclusion isn’t correct any more. Mohammed checks the original and his own multiple times but he still gets the same result.
Mohammed is very concerned because the paper with the published results of the experiments his professor did has been referenced many times.
What should Mohammed do?
Bring this to his professor’s attention as soon as possible.
Go to the head of the school and tell her that his professor has been falsifying his results.
Do nothing. Mohammed obviously isn’t doing the calculations properly as his professor is much more intelligent and knows much more about the subject than he does.
Consider the following situation.
Mohammed is a third year undergraduate student studying epidemiology. His professor is highly regarded in the field and Mohammed is very excited to study under him. However, while trying to replicate one of his professor’s experiments, Mohammed notices that his professor made a small error when calculating the data for the original experiment. When Mohammed fixes the error, it changes the results so much that the conclusion isn’t correct any more. Mohammed checks the original and his own multiple times but he still gets the same result.
Mohammed is very concerned because the paper with the published results of the experiments his professor did has been referenced many times.
Mohammed decides to approach his professor with the mistake and his calculations. However, his professor tells him not to worry about it and that “is just how science is”. His professor does nothing.
What should Mohammed do now?
Go to the head of the school and tell her that his professor is has been falsifying his results.
Do nothing. Maybe that is just how science is done in epidemiology.
Go to the head of the school and ask for their opinion on the situation.
Tell his friend who works at the university’s newspaper all about it, so they can write up an expose on his professor.
“A wise man … proportions his belief to the evidence.” – David Hume
What quality of academic culture does this relate to?
The contingent nature of academic knowledge
The need for proof to support opinions
The use of research to produce knowledge
The importance of independent learning
Consider the following situation:
For a course Timmy is taking, he has to conduct a research experiment and write a full research report. Part of the research report is a literature review. Timmy feels really lucky because earlier in the semester they had to write a literature review for the same class.
Can Timmy use the same literature review he did earlier in the course for this assignment?
No, this would be considered self-plagiarism.
No, this would be considered Fabrication
Definitely. If it is on the same topic for the same course, Timmy does not need to write the literature review again.
It depends; Timmy should check his course outline or lecturer to make sure.
Which of the following is a trait of critical thinking according to lecture 1.2b?
It is easy and carefree.
It reflects on its own basis, background and reasons.
It is forceful and persuasive.
It aims to be objective and free from bias.
How had university changed some of the people interviewed in lesson 1.3a?
It caused them to change careers and become actors.
It had helped them understand communication in different contexts.
It had caused them to ask people their feelings.
It had given them better people skills.
What is argumentation?
Taking a stance or position in relation to a topic
A set of reasons to show that a conclusion is valid
An angry disagreement
The process of disagreeing with someone
Which of the following are examples of metacognition?
Assessing your own biases
Knowing what will happen before it actually happens
Reflecting on your own thought processes
Evaluating an argument
What is a disposition?
A form of argument
A question for inquiry
A type of reflection
A tendency to do something
Which disposition is “being orderly in your inquiry” an example of?
Inquisitiveness
Being systematic in thinking
Truth-seeking
Self-confidence
Which disposition is “being motivated to find the best knowledge” an example of?
Inquisitiveness
Being systematic in thinking
Truth-seeking
Self-confidence
Which disposition is “accepting others’ points of view” an example of?
Self-confidence
Being analytical
Open-mindedness
Maturity
Dr Sakhaee identifies two forms of mindset. What are they?
Growth mindset
Negatory mindset
Curious mindset
Negative mindset
Dr Pardo compares acquiring skills in critical thinking with acquiring a catalogue of …
… answers
… data sources
… concept maps
… techniques
Which of the habits of mind or dispositions discussed in lesson 2.1a is reflected in the following quote?
“When I started thinking about my assignment question, the first thing I did was to start applying some of the techniques that I had learnt in my course. My lecturer had talked about a set of criteria that could be applied to problems in my field, so I used that to start generating solutions.”
Metacognition
Self-confidence
Being systematic
Being open-minded
Which of the habits of mind or dispositions discussed in lesson 2.1a is reflected in the following quote?
“The final assignment in my organisational behavior course was a complex case study assignment about some issues in a large company. It’s unrealistic to expect in a tricky situation such as this that there is only one possible answer.”
Maturity
Truth-seeking
Being analytical
Metacognition
Which of the habits of mind or dispositions discussed in lesson 2.1a is reflected in the following quote?
“Through my university course my lecturers really helped me reflect on my own thinking processes. One unit in particular made me do so using an online reflective blog. It was a bit of a pain at the time, but I recognize now how useful it is.”
Metacognition
Truth-seeking
Being analytical
Inquisitiveness
Which of the following are characteristics of an argument in the personal sphere?
The participants are usually angry.
It is private.
There are no fixed rules for reasoning
It is based entirely on opinions.
Which of the following are characteristics of an argument in the technical sphere?
Arguments follow strict rules.
It is written.
They are aimed at a specific audience.
They are about the use of technology.
Which of the following are characteristics of an argument in the technical sphere?
You can use insults.
Is aimed at a specific audience, for example: a group of people working in the same field
Often tries to change people’s opinions on a subject.
Follows specific guidelines for the collection, analysis and presentation of information and results.
Consider the following list of traits of the different spheres of argumentation.
1. Uses any example or means as evidence in arguments
2. No fixed rules for reasoning or evidence
3. Aimed at a specific audience
4. Tries to change opinions or values
5. Adheres to strict rules about data collection and analysis
6. Aimed at the general public
Which traits describe the technical sphere of argumentation?
1 and 2
2 and 3
3 and 4
3 and 5
4 and 5
Consider the following list of traits of the different spheres of argumentation.
1. Uses any example or means as evidence in arguments
2. No fixed rules for reasoning or evidence
3. Aimed at a specific audience
4. Tries to change opinions or values
5. Adheres to strict rules about data collection and analysis
6. Aimed at the general public
Which traits describe the personal sphere of argumentation?
1 and 2
2 and 3
3 and 4
3 and 5
4 and 5
Which argument sphere does the following argument belong to?
“We definitely need the new rail system in this area. Buses are usually late, and it’s a long way to drive to the city. It’s a bit more comfortable getting a train too I think.”
The technical sphere of argumentation
The private sphere of argumentation.
The public sphere of argumentation
The personal sphere of argumentation
Which of the following are features of an argument field?
A specialised language
Shared processes of thought
Agreement about what knowledge is
The same research methods
Use of narrative
Apart from academic disciplines, what else can help define an argument field?
A research methodology
A university
A lecturer
A school of thought
In which of the following disciplines would you probably need to display argumentation in your first year of study?
History
Biology
Electrical Engineering
Which of the following are characteristics of argument fields?
Agreement on what knowledge is
Shared academic discipline such as biology or law
Common object of study
Shared processes of thought
Shared opinion on the common object of study
Apart from academic disciplines, what are some other things that can define an argument field?
School of thought
Profession
Faculty
Courtroom
Think back to the lesson on differences in argumentation in History and Biology. What is an example of a difference in argumentation in the arts and social sciences courses on the one hand, and science courses on the other?
In arts and social sciences courses students will generally need to engage in argumentation much earlier in their courses than science students.
In arts and social sciences courses students will generally need to engage in argumentation much later in their courses than science students.
In the sciences argumentation generally takes the form of arguing for solutions.
In the arts and social sciences argumentation generally takes the form of arguing for solutions.
Which of the following would be a content question?
What is the significance of the first line of Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby?
Why was the author of this paper accepting undisclosed payments from a company with a vested interest in his research?
How can teachers use Vygotsky’s theory on the zone of proximal development to improve their students’ outcomes?
What evidence has the author given and how do we know if it is correct?
How does critical thinking relate to content knowledge?
There’s no relationship.
Critical thinking declines as content knowledge grows
Critical thinking improves as content knowledge improves.
Why is asking questions a key part of knowledge production at universities, according to Brooke Donnelly?
Because lecturers like it when you ask questions.
Because questions instill doubt and make you study harder.
Because knowledge isn’t produced by just doing what we’ve always done.
What two characteristics defined successful students in the final assignment in the Critical Thinking for Engineering course?
They wrote more than the other students.
They tried to find a definitive answer.
They didn’t try to find a definitive answer
They approached the issues with questions in mind.
What is a questioning stance, according to the lesson?
A general way of life
A way of reading a text
A way of standing that improves concentration
A way of approaching a text
Why is a questioning stance a central part of academic culture, according to Brick, Herke and Wong (2016)?
Because students are assessed on their ability to adopt a questioning stance
Because students need to analyze the reliability of sources
Because it is a form of independent learning
Because argument and debate advance knowledge
Why do we need to take a questioning stance in our learning at university?
Because it is so important in academic culture
To poke holes in an argument
To more fully understand the topic you are learning
To avoid the ‘who cares’ questions
Consider the following situation.
A group of engineering students are doing a group assignment. The assignment asks them to calculate the ability of a tall building to withstand wind, earthquakes and other potential stresses. One student, who has worked through all the set questions and activities in class, knows how to address the question and helps the others students complete the assignment with assurance.
Which of the following dispositions or habits of mind for critical thinking is the student displaying?
Truth-seeking
Self-confidence
Inquisitiveness
Metacognition
Consider the following situation.
A student is asked to do a feminist analysis of a movie. The student already has strong opinions about both feminism and the film they must analyse. However, they make a mental note of their biases when conducting research. The student makes sure they read sources representing a variety of different views, rather than just their own.
Which of the following dispositions or habits of mind for critical thinking is the student displaying?
Being systemic in your thinking
Self-confidence
Inquisitiveness
Metacognition
Which argument sphere does the following argument belong to?
“Proponents of the new rail network say that it will reduce traffic and car emissions. What is overlooked, however, is the enormous bill for the cost of the new rail network will present to current and future generations, a bill that the citizens of this state will be paying off for quite some time.”
The technical sphere of argumentation
The media sphere of argumentation.
The public sphere of argumentation.
The personal sphere of argumentation
Which argument sphere does the following argument belong to?
“In contrast with many neoclassical theorists, who see government spending as constrained, modern monetary theory (MMT) sees government spending as relatively less limited. This is because according to MMT the very notion of government debt is a misnomer due to the government’s control over the fiat money supply. Thus spending on infrastructure projects is often seen as advantageous, particularly at times of low interest rates.”
The technical sphere of argumentation
The academic sphere of argumentation
The public sphere of argumentation
The personal sphere of argumentation
Consider the following methodology, which can be considered an argument field.
Conversation analysis is a well-defined method and school of thought that analyses language from a social perspective. It seeks to study naturally occurring talk, either in everyday conversations or institutional settings such as schools and organizations. Any conversation analysis must be strictly based on the actual conversation, and outside categories (such as the race or class of the speaker) cannot be imposed unless they are referred to in the conversation being analyzed. Conversation analysts seek to find out what actions are performed by speakers in conversation (e.g. telling stories, making arrangements), and how they organize their talk in order to do that. They use a special mode of analysis to understand how actions are performed in talk called the next turn proof procedure. In this procedure, the action of the speaker is understood by examining how the following speaker understood them. When discussing the organization of talk, conversation analysts use terms such as turns, sequence organization and repair (how speakers fix errors in their talk).
When thinking about Conversation Analysis as an argument field, what is a specialized process of thought?
The next turn proof procedure
Sequence organization and repair
What actions are performed in the talk-in-interaction, and how the talk is sequentially organized into turns and sequences
Naturally occurring talk-in-interaction.
Consider the following methodology, which can be considered an argument field.
Conversation analysis is a well-defined method and school of thought that analyses language from a social perspective. It seeks to study naturally occurring talk, either in everyday conversations or institutional settings such as schools and organizations. Any conversation analysis must be strictly based on the actual conversation, and outside categories (such as the race or class of the speaker) cannot be imposed unless they are referred to in the conversation being analyzed. Conversation analysts seek to find out what actions are performed by speakers in conversation (e.g. telling stories, making arrangements), and how they organize their talk in order to do that. They use a special mode of analysis to understand how actions are performed in talk called the next turn proof procedure. In this procedure, the action of the speaker is understood by examining how the following speaker understood them. When discussing the organization of talk, conversation analysts use terms such as turns, sequence organization and repair (how speakers fix errors in their talk).
When thinking about Conversation Analysis as an argument field, what is object of study?
The next turn proof procedure
Sequence organization and repair
What actions are performed in the talk-in-interaction, and how the talk is sequentially organized into turns and sequences
Naturally occurring talk-in-interaction
Consider the following abstract for an academic journal article.
Mega-events, such as the Olympic Games and world fairs, are a major factor in tourism development, urban revitalization, and urban reimaging strategies. However, despite their economic, social, and political significance, it is only within the last decade that substantial attention has been paid to their impact and legacies. This article provides a discussion of the scope and definition of mega-events, an analysis of the reasons why mega-events are held, and offers an examination of the housing and social impact of mega-events on host cities and regions with special reference to the housing and social planning of the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. The article concludes that the focus on the economic dimension of events is often at the expense of social, environmental, and political analyses.
(Hall, C. M., & Hodges, J. (1996). The party's great, but what about the hangover?: The housing and social impacts of mega-events with special reference to the 2000 Sydney Olympics. Festival Management and Event Tourism, 4(1-1), 13-20.)
A student has taken a questioning stance towards this article. Here are some of the questions he has asked of the text.
1. “What are the qualifications of C.M. Hall and J. Hodges?”
2. “How could the information included in this article be used to better organise mega-events in the future?”
3. “What are the weaknesses of their position on the impacts of mega-events?”
4. “Do I agree with their notion that the economic dimension of these events is in contradiction to environmental and social analyses?”
5. “What evidence are Hall and Hodges using?”
6. “Does their argument make sense?”
Which of these questions are content questions?
1, 2 and 3
1, 5 and 6
2, 3 and 4
3, 4 and 6
Consider the following abstract for an academic journal article.
Mega-events, such as the Olympic Games and world fairs, are a major factor in tourism development, urban revitalization, and urban reimaging strategies. However, despite their economic, social, and political significance, it is only within the last decade that substantial attention has been paid to their impact and legacies. This article provides a discussion of the scope and definition of mega-events, an analysis of the reasons why mega-events are held, and offers an examination of the housing and social impact of mega-events on host cities and regions with special reference to the housing and social planning of the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. The article concludes that the focus on the economic dimension of events is often at the expense of social, environmental, and political analyses.
(Hall, C. M., & Hodges, J. (1996). The party's great, but what about the hangover?: The housing and social impacts of mega-events with special reference to the 2000 Sydney Olympics. Festival Management and Event Tourism, 4(1-1), 13-20.)
A student has taken a questioning stance towards this article. Here are some of the questions he has asked of the text.
1. “What are the qualifications of C.M. Hall and J. Hodges?”
2. “How could the information included in this article be used to better organise mega-events in the future?”
3. “What are the weaknesses of their position on the impacts of mega-events?”
4. “Do I agree with their notion that the economic dimension of these events is in contradiction to environmental and social analyses?”
5. “What evidence are Hall and Hodges using?”
6. “Does their argument make sense?”
Which of these questions are context questions?
1, 2 and 3
1, 5 and 6
2, 3 and 4
3, 4 and 6
Is this an example of an argument:
I don’t like ice-cream.
Yes
No
In formal logic, a statement is any sentence that is either valid or invalid. For example, the sentence “the book is green” is a statement. Statements can function as either premises or conclusions. However, a question is not a statement, so “Is the book green?” would not be classified as a statement. Equally, instructions are not statements. So the sentence, “Paint the book green!” is not a statement, nor is a simple sentence like “Stop!” or “Open the door!”
Is this a statement?
“It is a commonly held belief that there are more homeless people in the summer months than in winter”
Yes, this is a statement.
No, this is not a statement
Is this a statement?
“There is an estimated 1.4million people who “sleep rough” during the harsh European winters.”*
*false statistic
Yes, this is a statement.
No, this is not a statement.
Is this a statement?
What is the government doing to solve this issue?
Yes, this is a statement.
No, this is not a statement.
Consider the following argument:
It isn’t easy for homeless people to “just get a job”. Often, homeless people spend so much time and energy finding food and shelter each day that they don’t have the time to write a CV and apply for jobs. Moreover, many homeless people struggle to make themselves look presentable for interviews.
It isn’t easy for homeless people to “just get a job”.
Often, homeless people spend so much time and energy finding food and shelter each day that they don’t have the time to write a CV and apply for jobs.
Moreover, many homeless people struggle to make themselves look presentable for interviews.
Indicate which sentence(s) are the premises.
The average cost of a cheap hair cut is $15 to $25. Moreover, doing laundry costs money, as does accessing showers. However, when you’re homeless and unemployed you need to use every penny you have to buy food or a bed for the night. Thus, many homeless people, especially those who sleep rough, struggle to make themselves look presentable for interviews.
The average cost of a cheap hair cut is $15 to $25.
However, when you’re homeless and unemployed you need to use every penny you have to buy food or a bed for the night.
Moreover, doing laundry costs money, as does accessing showers.
Thus, many homeless people, especially those who sleep rough, struggle to make themselves look presentable for interviews.
What is the implicit premise(s) in this statement:
You would like to be attractive and happy.
That being attractive and happy is good.
That you are not attractive and happy
That you are already attractive and happy
What is the implicit premise in this rhetorical question:
Are you sick of having dull hair?
That you have dull hair
That you are sick of dull hair
That you have dull hair and you are sick of your dull hair
That having dull hair is good
What is an argument?
An argument is a statement that you want someone to believe.
An argument is a statement that is used as evidence.
An argument is any attempt to justify a conclusion.
“My mug of tea is on the table in the kitchen.
This is the only mug of tea on the table in the kitchen.
Therefore, this mug of tea is mine.”
Is this a valid argument?
Yes
No
“All animals that wean their offspring are mammals.
Even though platypus lay eggs, they wean their offspring.
Therefore, platypus are mammals.”
Is this a valid argument?
Yes
No
“I have seen 40,000 swans.
All the swans that I have ever seen are white.
All pictures and records of swans say they are white.
Therefore, all swans are white.”
Is this a valid argument?
Yes
No
“I know that all poodles are mammals because all cats are mammals and all poodles are cats.”
Is this argument good or bad?
Good
Bad
Are these two equivalent?
“All A are B
All C are A
Therefore, all C are B. “
And
“All X are Y
All Z are Y
Therefore, all Z are X”
Yes
No
Consider the following argument:
“If it is 5pm, I can go home. It is 5pm. Therefore…”
What is the conclusion?
I can go home.
It is 5pm.
It is late.
I need to make dinner.
“If I jump into the pool wearing my clothes, my clothes will be wet. My clothes are wet. Therefore, I jumped into the pool.”
Is this valid?
Yes
No
“If you don’t have any fuel, you can’t drive your car. You can’t drive your car, therefore you don’t have any fuel.”
Is this a valid argument?
Yes
No
Consider the following argument:
“I either left my keys at home, or I’ve lost them.
My keys are not at home.
Therefore…”
What is the conclusion?
I’ve lost my keys.
We can’t know.
My keys are not at home.
Consider the following argument:
“Jenny didn’t eat soup for lunch.
Therefore, she ate a sandwich.”
What is the missing premise?
Jenny either ate a sandwich for lunch, or she ate soup
Jenny hates soup.
If Jenny doesn’t eat a sandwich, she will eat soup.
We can either have vegetarian food for dinner, or Chinese food.
John doesn’t want vegetarian food.
Therefore, we will have Chinese food.
Chinese food can be vegetarian as well, so it is not an either/or argument.
We should all eat vegetarian food.
Have a look at the following statement. Which sentence is the conclusion?
I have the right to leave work after lunch. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 24, everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours. I have been working an unreasonable amount of hours.
The first sentence
The second sentence
The third sentence
Have a look at the following argument. What is one problem with the argument?
According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 24, everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours. I have been working an unreasonable amount of hours. Therefore, I have the right to leave work after lunch.
The conclusion doesn’t logically follow the premises.
The premises are not logically connected.
The first premise is not valid.
The second premise is not strong, because the definition of ‘reasonable’ is unclear and needs to be further illustrated.
Have a look at the following argument. What is the problem with the conclusion?
I have the right to leave work after lunch. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 24, everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours. I have been working an unreasonable amount of hours.
The conclusion comes before the premises
The conclusion is not the most logical result of the premises.
The conclusion does not follow from the premises.
Consider the following argument:
“If it is 5pm then I can leave work. It is 5pm. Therefore, I can leave work.”
What kind of argument structure does this follow?
Categorical logical structure
Hypothetical logical structure
Disjunctive logical structure
Two trends that occur at the same time exist in a cause-effect relationship.
The trends of increased shark attacks and increased ice cream sales occur at the same time.
Therefore, shark attacks are caused by increased ice cream sales or vice versa.
Which premise is problematic?
Two trends that occur at the same time exist in a cause-effect relationship.
The trends of increased shark attacks and increased ice cream sales occur at the same time.
Consider the following argument and counter argument:
“Argument: A solution to the problem of homelessness in Australia requires investment in affordable housing.
Counter-argument: Giving homeless people free houses may encourage more people to become homeless.”
What is the logical fallacy in the counter-argument?
It doesn’t show compassion towards homeless people.
It argues against giving free houses. This is not the same as the original argument ‘investment in affordable housing’.
It paints homeless people in a negative light
Have a look at the following passage. What is wrong with the argument?
Every morning, as it gets closer to midday, the temperature rises. At the same time, I always start to feel hungry. Therefore, an increase in temperature makes me hungry.
It assumes that there is a cause-effect relationship between the two trends.
It draws a conclusion based on too few examples.
It misrepresents the original argument.
Which of the following statements can be considered hasty generalizations?
All generalizations are bad.
All homeless people are unemployed.
Winter months are colder than Summer months.
Have a look at the following passage. What is wrong with the counter-argument?
Argument: Research suggests that restorative and reparative punishments, such as community-service sentences, result in a reduction of repeat offenders. This is particularly the case for minor, non-violent offenses. The justice system should reduce the amount of prison sentences and increase the number of community-service sentences for minor, non-violent offences.*
Counter-argument: According to crime statistics, between 50% and 60% of all released prisoners will re-offend. If you take criminals out of jail and let them free on the street you will be putting innocent people’s lives in danger.*
*Arguments are fictional
It assumes that there is a cause effect relationship between the two trends.
It draws a conclusion based on too little evidence.
It misrepresents the original argument.
Imagine you have a bag of stones in front of you. All the stones in the bag are black. You pull out a single stone.
Logically, what color is the stone? (You cannot look at the stone!)
Black
Red
White
Why is this argument not deductively valid?
Most cats shed fur.
Your pet is a cat.
Therefore, your pet probably sheds fur.
Sphynx cats do not shed fur.
I don’t have a pet cat.
You may own a sphynx cat, which is hairless and thus does not shed fur.
Imagine that you have a bag of stones in front of you. You know that there is 1 white stone and 99 black stones. You pull out a single stone from the bag.
Logically, what color is the stone? (You cannot look at the stone!)
Black
White
Red
Imagine that you have a bag of stones in front of you. You cannot see what color the stones are, so you reach in and pull out a handful. In the handful, all the stones you pulled out are black.
Logically, what can you say about the stones in the bag? (You cannot look at the stones in the bag!)
It is full of different colored stones. The black stones are the lightest so they are on the top of the bag. All the other colored stones are below it.
90% of the stones in the bag are white. This was a one in a million chance occasion
All the stones, or the vast majority of stones, in the bag are black
What is one of the downsides to using deductive reasoning in a university context?
Deductive reasoning needs to use strong, fixed language and this means it can be more easily attacked and disproven than other forms of reasoning.
Deductive reasoning is weaker than other forms of reasoning.
Deductive reasoning uses probabilities and is therefore not always true.
What are the two main types of reasoning that you find at university?
Reasoning that moves from specific observations to general conclusions
Reasoning that moves from general statements to specific conclusions.
Reasoning using probabilities
Reasoning using generalizations.
Reasoning that moves from theory to practice
The Artape people have lived on the island of Staples for between 20,000 and 25,000 years. A number of archaeological sites have been radiocarbon dated to around 19,000 BC, although there is evidence of some tools being used by hunters as early as 23,000 BC. They are thought to have migrated across from Africa on land bridges that existed before the last ice age. Archaeological evidence, such as oral stories, rock pictures and some ancient fossils, suggests that there was trade between the main land and the smaller island across these land bridges, but this stopped when the seas rose around 12,000 years ago.*
*Fictional people & history
What kind of reasoning is evident here?
This is an example of reasoning from specific observations to general conclusions.
This is an example of reasoning from general observations to specific conclusions
This is an example of reasoning using probabilities.
Keeping these two points in mind, what do a metro system, the human body and a large organization have in common?
They all have multiple components and each component is connected to the other components.
Each one needs to be understood by what happens as a result of the relationship between different components.
They all involve people.
They have nothing in common.
What is one problem with the laundry list approach?
The name is not very academic.
It doesn’t accurately represent the relationship between the different factors as well as how the issue also affects the factors.
It doesn’t show all the different causes of the issue.
Professor Reimann says that systems thinking is connected to critical thinking in two ways. What are they?
Because it means you are able to think in feedback loops.
Because it means thinking critically about the climate.
Because it helps you identify the validity of assumptions.
Because being systematic in your thinking is a key disposition for critical thinking.
What is the problem with the following ‘laundry list’ approach to the issue of homelessness?
Mental health issues >
Poverty > homelessness
Unemployment >
The factors are not related to each other.
The list doesn’t demonstrate the relationship between each factor and how they are related.
The factors are not relevant.
The list only indicates a one way relationship between the causes and effect.
How can re-framing the following statement as a cycle (or a ‘feedback loop’) help create a better understanding of the issue?
Mental health issues, unemployment and poverty are all factors that lead to homelessness.
It shows that all factors are equally important.
Thinking in terms of a cycle shows that it is not only a cause-effect relationship, and that homelessness itself can contribute to the factors of mental health issues, unemployment and poverty as well.
It demonstrates that the factors are all inter-related and therefore a solution that addresses only one factor would not be sufficient to solve the issue
As well as the benefits mentioned in regards to the feedback loop above, why else would it be useful to see the issue of homelessness through a systems thinking perspective, looking at the issue as a web of interrelated components?
It helps understand the complexity of the issue and to see the bigger picture.
To be able to see how insignificant individual factors are overall
To be able to see what occurs between each of the individual components
To see how complex and confusing everything is
Have a look at the following argument based on an advertisement. What are the implicit (unspoken) premises?
There are many young, beautiful people on a beach having fun. They are drinking Cool Cola. You should buy Cool Cola.
That Cool Cola is high in sugar and should only be drunk in moderation
That Cool Cola makes the young, beautiful people in the advertisement happy
That if you buy Cool Cola you will also be young, beautiful and happy
That the young people are actors hired to promote Cool Cola
Have a look at the following argument. What is the problem with the conclusion?
Cool Cola makes people happy. There are many young, beautiful people on a beach having fun. They are drinking Cool Cola.
The conclusion comes before the premise.
The conclusion does not follow from the premises.
The conclusion is not the most logical result of the premises.
The Artape people have lived on the island of Staples for between 20,000 and 31,000 years. A number of archaeological sites have been radiocarbon dated to around 20,000 BC. They are thought to have migrated across from Africa on land bridges that existed before the last ice age. Movement between the main land and Staples across these land bridges was quite common. Archaeological evidence, such as oral stories, rock pictures and some ancient fossils, suggests that the Staler people, the ancestors of the Artape, used the island for hunting from as far back as 31,000 BC. However, there is no evidence of settlement or continuous habitation of the island until around 25,000 BC, when evidence of temporary camps starts. It is not until 20,000 BC that we start to see evidence of permanent dwellings. All migration from the main land to Stapes stopped when the seas rose around 12,000 years ago. *
*Fictional peoples & History
What is the conclusion of this argument?
The Artape people and their ancestors have lived on the island of Staples for between 20,000 and 31,000 years.
Movement between the main land and Staples across these land bridges was quite common.
All migration from the main land to Staples stopped when the seas rose around 12,000 years ago.
Archaeological evidence, such as oral stories, rock pictures and some ancient fossils, suggests that the Staler people, the ancestors of the Artape, used the island for hunting from as far back as 31,000 BC.
People lived on the island of Staples as far back as 19,000 BC. Man-made artifacts have been found at a number of archaeological sites. These man-made artifacts have been carbon dated to 19,000 BC. For example, a partial leg bone of a juvenile marsupial herbivore was discovered at one of the sites. This partial leg bone has been sharpened into a bone point. There is clear evidence of sharp stone tools being used to refine the bone, which were also found at the site. The fossil has no carnivore tooth marks on it and was found in a shelter on a steep escarpment unsuitable for climbing by this kind of marsupial herbivore. Only humans have the capability and dexterity to make and use these kinds of tools. This leg bone tool, therefore, was made by humans. This serves as evidence that humans lived on the island of Staples as far back as 19,000 BC. *
*Fictional historical account
What kind of formal reasoning is being used in this example?
This is an example of reasoning from specific observations to general conclusions.
This is an example of reasoning from general observations to specific conclusions.
This is an example of reasoning that combines general and specific observations to make a general conclusion.
This is an example of reasoning using probabilities
Have a look at the following passage. What is wrong with the argument?
During the 2000s smart phone sales and ownership increased dramatically. At the same time, warfare in the Middle East escalated. It is clear that smart phones usage was a main contributor to the intensity of international warfare in the 2000s.
It assumes that there is a cause-effect relationship between the two trends.
It draws a conclusion based on too few examples.
It misrepresents the original argument.
Have a look at the following passage. What is wrong with the counter-argument?
Argument: Sometimes when you are having trouble writing your assignment it is good to take a short break.
Counter-argument: Procrastinating instead of doing your work means nothing will ever get done.
It assumes that there is a cause effect relationship between the two trends.
It draws a conclusion based on too few examples.
It misrepresents the original argument.
What problems are there with the following ‘laundry list’ approach to the following issue:It suggests that each factor is of equal importance.
It suggests that each factor is of equal importance.
It suggests a one-way relationship between the causes and the effect.
It doesn’t provide any solutions to the problem.
It suggests that there are only three causes that contribute to the issue.
How can re-framing the following statement as a cycle (or a ‘feedback loop’) help create a better understanding of the issue?
Too many private cars, inadequate public transport and insufficient road networks are all factors that lead to congestion.
Representing the situation as a cycle allows us to see how minor each individual factor is in the overall scheme of things
It shows that any solution would have to address all of the factors that contribute to the issue.
It shows that each factor equally contributes to the issue.
Representing the situation as a cycle shows how the factors are interdependent and can effect each other.
Which of the following sentences is a claim appropriate for academic argument?
You stole my boyfriend.
It is raining outside.
Homelessness is a growing problem.
Global warming is not a major concern for the future.
Why should the 2nd sentence be considered a claim rather than evidence?
(1) The government should reduce the amount of money given in welfare. (2) Homeless people don’t want to work, they just want to receive welfare payments.
Trick question! This sentence is an example of ‘evidence’.
Because it is insulting to people who experience homelessness.
Because it is a sweeping generalization that should be challenged. Evidence of the proposed ‘laziness’ of all people experiencing homelessness must be given before it can be accepted as evidence.
According to Dr Benjamin Miller, what two qualities does a good claim have?
It is interesting.
It is a good summary.
It is engaging.
It is thoughtful.
Is the following sentence a claim or evidence?
Homelessness is still a major issue in Australia because policy makers haven’t made a concerted effort to fund and commit to one particular project for an appropriate length of time.
A claim
Evidence
Both a claim and evidence
Analyze the following paragraph. What is the origin of the evidence?
Homelessness is still a major issue in Australia because policy makers haven’t made a concerted effort to fund and commit to one particular project for an appropriate length of time. This is clear from research that has analyzed the history of homelessness programs in recent years. Parsell, Jones & Head draw on an extensive list of published articles and government reports analyzing homelessness programs in the UK, USA and Australia to conclude that “[a]ttracted by the successes in the UK and USA, Australian policy makers attempted a piecemeal transfer making it unlikely that the goal of permanently ending homelessness will be achieved” (Parsell, Jones & Head, 2012)
Reference:
Parsell, C., Jones, A. and Head, B. (2013). Policies and programs to end homelessness in Australia: Learning from international practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 10–23.
The arguer’s personal experience
Anecdotal experience that the arguer heard from others
The authors’ personal experience
The authors’ interpretation of other people’s experience
Analyse the following paragraph. What is the mode of the evidence?
Homelessness is still a major issue in Australia because policy makers haven’t made a concerted effort to fund and commit to one particular project for an appropriate length of time. This is clear from research that has analyzed the history of homelessness programs in recent years. Parsell, Jones & Head draw on an extensive list of published articles and government reports analyzing homelessness programs in the UK, USA and Australia to arrive at the conclusion that “attracted by the successes in the UK and USA, Australian policy makers attempted a piecemeal transfer making it unlikely that the goal of permanently ending homelessness will be achieved” (Parsell, Jones & Head, 2012).
Reference:
Parsell, C., Jones, A. and Head, B. (2013). Policies and programs to end homelessness in Australia: Learning from international practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 10–23.
Print media
Electronic media
Verbal communication
Analyze the following paragraph. What is the purpose of the evidence?
Homelessness is still a major issue in Australia because policy makers haven’t made a concerted effort to fund and commit to one particular project for an appropriate length of time. This is clear from research that has analyzed the history of homelessness programs in recent years. Parsell, Jones & Head draw on an extensive list of published articles and government reports analyzing homelessness programs in the UK, USA and Australia to arrive at the conclusion that “attracted by the successes in the UK and USA, Australian policy makers attempted a piecemeal transfer making it unlikely that the goal of permanently ending homelessness will be achieved” (Parsell, Jones & Head, 2012).
Reference:
Parsell, C., Jones, A. and Head, B. (2013). Policies and programs to end homelessness in Australia: Learning from international practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 10–23.
Academic
Non-academic
Analyze the following paragraph. What is the source of the evidence?
Homelessness is still a major issue in Australia because policy makers haven’t made a concerted effort to fund and commit to one particular project for an appropriate length of time. This is clear from research that has analyzed the history of homelessness programs in recent years. Parsell, Jones & Head draw on an extensive list of published articles and government reports analyzing homelessness programs in the UK, USA and Australia to arrive at the conclusion that “attracted by the successes in the UK and USA, Australian policy makers attempted a piecemeal transfer making it unlikely that the goal of permanently ending homelessness will be achieved” (Parsell, Jones & Head, 2012).
Reference:
Parsell, C., Jones, A. and Head, B. (2013).Policies and programmes to end homelessness in Australia: Learning from international practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 10–23
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
What are biases and assumptions in terms of arguments?
A bias is the direction diagonal to the weave on a piece of fabric.
A bias is a prejudice towards or against something.
An assumption is a claim with no evidence.
An assumption is an implicit premise.
A bias is a claim with no evidence.
Is the following statement true or false?
“Biases and assumptions are always negative and should be avoided at all costs”.
True
False
Is this text biased?
“Negotiations between Coleworth management and workers over wage claims broke down. A Coleworth spokesperson says that the union claims were excessive. Markets, concerned about a looming strike, sold off Coleworth stocks and they closed 20 cents lower at close of trading.”
(Alexander, 2015)
No, it’s not.
Yes, it’s biased towards Coleworth workers.
Yes, it’s biased towards Coleworth management.
Consider the following sentence:
Bombs were dropped on the capital city Mogkadad.
What important information do you think has been hidden in this sentence?
What country Mogkadad is in
If anybody died
Who dropped the bombs?
If the bombs did any damage
From what you’ve learned so far, what are the different ways an author can hide bias?
Through the use of strong or emotive language
By using specific sentence structures
By attacking the other person
By not representing all sides
With false classification schemes
Which of the following sentences means the same thing as “being homeless naturally leads to drug addiction”?
There is a strong causal link between homelessness and drug addiction.
Some homeless people become addicted to drugs due to their circumstances.
Drug addiction is a common result of being homeless.
Being homeless might lead to drug addiction.
Watch the video in the link below. Count how many times the players wearing white pass the ball.
https://youtu.be/vJG698U2Mvo
Chabris & Simmons (1999) Selective Attention Test
How many times did the players wearing white pass the ball?
13
14
15
16
What is confirmation bias?
The tendency to see evidence that validates your own beliefs.
A preference to keep things as they are rather than risk changing them.
The tendency for skilled people to underestimate their ability and the tendency for less-skilled people to overestimate their ability.
What is the difference between a bias and an assumption?
A bias is a form of stereotype while an assumption is a type of evidence.
A bias is a type of evidence while an assumption is a form of stereotype.
A bias is a type claim with no evidence and an assumption is a prejudice for or against someone or something.
A bias is a prejudice for or against someone or something and an assumption is a type of claim with no evidence.
Consider the following statement.
We can see three types of homeless living on the streets of Albuquerque. There are those poor souls that are homeless due to bad luck; there are drunkards and drug addicts; and there are inveterate criminals.
What is the main kind of bias present?
False classification scheme
Bias is hidden in language.
Use of an ad hominem
Positioning the reader in the same in-group
What kind of bias is present in the following statement?
The key to solving homelessness is social housing.
Use of logical connectors creates bias
Positioning the reader in the same in-group
Use of emotive language
Use of certain or definitive language
Which of these is an appropriate claim in an argument for academic purposes?
You stole my pen.
It’s difficult to say exactly what constitutes ‘good art’.
It’s too hot outside.
The statement ‘It’s difficult to say exactly what constitutes ‘good art’’ is a claim. Which of the following can be considered evidence to support the claim?
That’s because some works of art are just not very good, but you just can’t articulate why.
For example, the poet John Keats and the artist Vincent Van Gogh both received overwhelmingly negative responses from critics in their lifetimes, yet are now considered to be among the greatest artists in their respective fields.
Do you think a small sample size in a survey is really a problem, as long as you present the facts accurately?
It’s not a problem, because the results are accurate and honest, and that’s the most important thing.
It’s a problem because the results are not true.
It’s a problem because the results are misleading.
Which of the following statements are NOT relevant premises?
(1) I need to get up at 7am.
(2) My alarm is set for 7am.
(3) My alarm is sounding now.
(4)Therefore, it is 7am.
(1) I need to get up at 7am.
2) My alarm is set for 7am.
3) My alarm is sounding now.
(4) Therefore, it is 7am.
What is needed to provide a better link between the premises and the conclusion of this argument?
Evidence of the lack of adequate housing in the city, such as a census report or academic research
A link between the first two premises that explains why the issue of housing has impacted on homelessness
A description of the current type of accommodation on offer
Less direct language
What problem is there with the following evidence?
Homelessness is an increasingly worrying problem in the USA. According to Langdon and Kass (1985), “[homelessness] is a national crisis of ever-increasing proportions. Hundreds of thousands of persons across the country are so desperately poor that they lack even minimal shelter” (p.305). They state that there are more homeless people now than any time since the Great Depression.
Reference:
Langdon, J. K. & Kass, M.A. (1985). Homelessness in America: Looking for the Right to Shelter. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 19(3), 305-392.
Reliability
Sample size
Currency
Relevance
What questions can you ask to determine if the evidence is relevant to the conclusion?
Does the evidence support the conclusion?
If I took the evidence away, would it make a difference to the conclusion?
Does the evidence seem convincing?
Is the evidence old and out-of-date?
What problem is there with the following argument?
There are more homeless people now than at any time since the Great Depression. The Great Depression ended with the onset of World War II. Therefore, a similar momentous event is needed to end the current plight of homelessness.
Nothing. It is a good argument.
The premises are false.
The link between the two premises is only a correlation, not a causal relationship.
The conclusion is not the most logical outcome from the premises.
Which of the following are tests to evaluate argument types in this lesson?
Test of quality
Test of claim
Test of difference
Test of quantity
Test of opposition
Which of the following statements best describes an argument from analogy?
Two things, that are similar in known ways, are also similar in other previous unknown ways.
An observable sign indicates something that cannot be observed.
One thing or event causes another
What is a test of quantity for an argument from analogy?
Are there enough comparisons?
Are there any great dissimilarities?
Are the compared objects similar enough?
Would oxygen be a ‘strong’ or ‘weak’ cause of a fire?
A strong cause
A weak cause
What do we look for in a test of opposition with causal arguments?
If the cause is a necessary condition for the effect
If the effect is produced by another cause
If the effect is the cumulative effect of many causes
If the cause is a sufficient condition for the effect
Which of the following statements best describes a generalization argument?
Two things, that resemble each other in known ways, also resemble each other in other previous unknown ways.
It tries to separate one idea from another idea to which it is commonly associated, and associate with another idea or set of ideas.
An argument that suggests that what is true of a certain small group of members is true of the member group as a whole.
How do quasilogical arguments resemble logical arguments?
They use mathematics.
Because the other argument types are illogical.
Because they resemble logical arguments with clear premises and conclusions.
Which of the following statements best describes a co-existential argument?
An observable sign indicates something that cannot be observed.
One thing or event causes another.
An argument that suggests that what is true of a certain small group of members is true of the member group as a whole.
Which of these tests is NOT used for a dissociation argument?
Test of quantity
Test of quality
Test of opposition
What is the structure of a Rogerian argument?
Introduce your own argument, before introducing arguments from the other side, before concluding with the benefits to your approach from both sides.
Introduce arguments from the other side and show understanding, then introduce your own arguments, before concluding with the benefits to your approach from both sides.
Arrange your own argument to excite, before concluding with a call to action.
Consider the following statement.
“In the case of some areas of the internet that are heavily regulated, online trade has suffered from excess government regulation and control. It’s not hard to imagine the same thing happening if that kind of control was extended to all areas of the online economy.”
What type of argument is this?
Argument from analogy
Generalization
Causal argument
Quasilogical argument
Consider the following statement.
“There are many vulnerable children on the internet outside government protection, but vulnerable children need the government to protect them, so more government surveillance is needed.”
What type of argument is this?
Argument from analogy
Generalization
Causal argument
Quasilogical argument
Consider the following statement.
“A failure to act on threats made on social media sites by both the government and authorities has led to female users abandoning certain sites.”
What type of argument is this?
Argument from analogy
Generalization
Causal argument
Quasilogical argument
Consider the following argument.
Young people in lowly-paid jobs need to be given rental assistance from the government. They also need to get paid more by their employers. Perhaps employers could receive tax breaks from the government, which they could then pass on to young employees as higher wages.
Which of the following statements, about the claims and evidence in this argument, are true?
Rental assistance is necessary for lowly-paid poor people’ is a claim of this argument.
‘Employers getting tax breaks from the government’ is a form of evidence in this argument.
No evidence is presented in this argument.
The origin of the evidence in this argument is not clearly stated.
Consider the following argument.
Homelessness is often considered the preserve of the middle-aged, but it also falls heavily on young people. In the Springton area, for example, quite a few homeless people can be observed, particularly in the area bound by Holroyd and 4th St.
What is the origin of the evidence?
Non-academic
Primary
Verbal communication
Personal experience
Consider the following statement.
The laws were criticised as being ‘out of touch’ and ‘antiquated’.
How is bias displayed in this statement?
False classification schemes
Use of passive voice to hide responsibility
Ad hominem
Appealing to membership of a common group
Consider the following statement.
The treatment of homeless people is a sad indictment on this government and its policies.
How is bias displayed in this statement?
Use of emotive language
Ad hominem
Appealing to membership of a common group
Use of logical connectors and appealing to membership of a common group
Consider the following argument.
All pugs are dogs. Dogs are good pets. All dogs are mammals. Therefore, all pugs are mammals.
What questions can you ask to determine if the evidence is relevant to the conclusion in the following statement?
If I took the evidence away, would it make a difference to the conclusion?
Is the evidence old and out-of-date?
Does the evidence seem convincing?
Does the evidence support the conclusion?
What problem is there with the following argument?
I have all my best ideas in the shower. I need to regularly have good ideas when I am at work. Therefore, I need to have numerous showers during the day in order to perform well at work.
Nothing. It is a good argument.
The premises are false.
The premises are not connected.
The conclusion is not the most logical outcome from the premises.
Consider the following argument.
Social housing should be considered an opportunity to move past current market-based methods of organizing shelter for people, rather than as a burden for governments.
What type of argument is this?
Dissociation argument
Co-existential argument
Generalization
Causal argument
Consider the following argument.
The current crisis with homelessness in Dartshire, our sister city in so many ways, is an important lesson to us here. The same problem could well occur here too if city hall doesn’t provide more options for those without accommodation in the near future.
What type of argument is this?
Quasilogical argument
Generalization
Co-existential argument
Argument from analogy
Is this a convergent or divergent argument?
“The 1995 flooding of Ligan river delta resulted in both widespread displacement of the area’s residents, and extensive damage to the ecology.”
A convergent argument
A divergent argument
Is this a convergent or divergent argument?
“The glorious casting, the amazing special effects, and Claire Spencer’s confident direction mean that First Fire is one of my films of the year!”
A convergent argument
A divergent argument
Have a look at another chain argument.
If I sleep in I will be late. If I am late I will be in trouble.
What would A = C look like?
If I sleep in I will be late.
If I sleep-in I will be in trouble.
If I am late I will be in trouble
If I get in trouble I will feel bad all day
Can you see how the premises link together in this chain argument?
If the cost of rental accommodation increases disproportionately to income, then less people will be able to afford private housing.
If less people can afford private housing, there will be more people who rely on public housing.
If there are more people who rely on public housing, the current public housing allocation will be insufficient to meet demand.
If the current public housing allocation cannot meet demand, there will be more people who cannot access public housing.
If there are more people who cannot access public housing then there will be more people who do not have fixed accommodation.
If there are more people who do not have fixed accommodation, there will be an increase in the number of people experiencing homelessness.
Yes
No
Are these two arguments the same?
Original: If the cost of rental accommodation increases disproportionately to income then less people will be able to afford private housing. If less people can afford private housing there will be more people who rely on public housing. If there are more people who rely on public housing the current public housing allocation will be insufficient to meet demand.
New: If the cost of rental accommodation increased disproportionately to income, then less people would be able to afford private housing. This then would lead to an increase in the amount of people who rely on public housing, and a concomitant lack of public housing to meet demand.
Yes
No
Does anything sound wrong with the argument chain?
It sounds fine to me.
No, the argument jumps from correlation to cause.
No, the argument is wrong because some of the premises contain assumptions.
What do you think of the statement, ‘If there is a rise in the cost of housing, it will lead to an increase in the amount of people experiencing homelessness”?
It sounds fine to me.
It makes no sense at all.
It’s OK, but there may be more logical conclusions to the precedent
Read the following argument. Identify which sentences are part of the argument chain.
(1) A significant percentage of people experiencing homelessness are aged between 0-24 years of age. (2) One contributing factor for youth homelessness is a lack of exit planning after leaving statutory care, juvenile justice or medical facilities. (3) If there was increased funding for exit planning then youth at risk would have more opportunities for support. (4) If there were more opportunities for support then there would be a higher chance of intervention when at-risk youth face homelessness. (5) This would lead to a decrease in youth homelessness. (6) Therefore, funding for better exit planning would lead to a decrease in youth homelessness.
Every sentence
Sentences 1, 2 and 3
Sentences 3, 4 and 5
Sentences 3, 4, 5 and 6
Read the following argument. Is sentence (5) an appropriate sentence for a chain argument?
(1) A significant percentage of people experiencing homelessness are aged between 0-24 years of age. (2) One contributing factor for youth homelessness is a lack of exit planning after leaving statutory care, juvenile justice or medical facilities. (3) If there was increased funding for exit planning then youth at risk would have more opportunities for support. (4) If there were more opportunities for support then there would be a higher chance of intervention when at-risk youth face homelessness. (5) This would lead to a decrease in youth homelessness. (6) Therefore, funding for better exit planning would lead to a decrease in youth homelessness.
Yes, because it is a conclusion to the argument.
Yes, because it links the previous premise with a new premise.
No, because the antecedent (the 2nd part) of sentence 4 does not become the precedent (1st part) of sentence 5.
No, because it doesn’t use ‘if’ in the precedent (1st part of the sentence).
Read the following statement. What is the purpose of the argument?
If there was increased funding for exit planning for youth leaving statutory care, juvenile justice or medical facilities then there would be a decrease in youth homelessness. There is not increased funding, so there will not be a decrease in youth homelessness.
To prove a point
To refute an idea
To warn the audience of a terrible mistake
Slippery slope
Read the following statement. What is the problem with the conclusion?
If there was increased funding for exit planning for youth leaving statutory care, juvenile justice or medical facilities then there would be a decrease in youth homelessness. There is not increased funding, so there will not be a decrease in youth homelessness.
It is not the most logical outcome of the premise.
It does not use necessary hedging, or cautious, language.
Nothing, it is a good argument.
The conclusion is not a logical consequence of the premises.
Read the following statement. What is wrong with the argument?
If there is no funding for exit planning for young people leaving juvenile justice then those at-risk youth will not have adequate support or stability. If they don’t have adequate support or stability they will not be able to focus on their studies. If those youth are unable to focus on their studies they will drop out of school. If they drop out of school they will not be able to gain employment or be engaged meaningfully. This would lead them to a life of petty crime and worse.
The premises do not logically follow each other.
The premises do not present the most logical progression.
There are too many generalizations and assumptions for the argument to be convincing.
There is no conclusion.
What is a Warrant?
Another word for the conclusion to an argument.
A type of premise that provides rebuttal to a claim.
A type of premise that connects evidence to a claim.
Does acknowledging alternative arguments to your own strengthen or weaken your argument?
Strengthens
Weakens
Consider the following argument.
Homeless people should be allowed to occupy unused buildings that are owned by others (commonly referred to as “squatting”), as there are an estimated 700 000 empty properties in England that could be used as shelter. Any right that owners may claim to property is superseded by the rights of homeless people to shelter, as the right to shelter is an inalienable human right. This right to shelter applies in almost all cases of unoccupied properties, but of course would not apply if the property was only unoccupied in the short term.
(Adapted from Vasudevan, A. (2011, November 3). The sinister logic behind criminalising squatting. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/nov/03/criminalising-squatting-law-trespass-homeless)
“Any right that owners may claim to property is superseded by the rights of homeless people to shelter” is which part of the Toulmin model of argumentation?
Backing
Evidence
Qualifier
Warrant
Consider the following argument.
Homeless people should be allowed to occupy unused buildings that are owned by others (commonly referred to as “squatting”), as there are an estimated 700 000 empty properties in England that could be used as shelter. Any right that owners may claim to property is superseded by the rights of homeless people to shelter, as the right to shelter is an inalienable human right. This right to shelter applies in almost all cases of unoccupied properties, but of course would not apply if the property was only unoccupied in the short term.
(Adapted from Vasudevan, A. (2011, November 3). The sinister logic behind criminalising squatting. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/nov/03/criminalising-squatting-law-trespass-homeless)
“This right to shelter applies in almost all cases of unoccupied properties” is which part of the Toulmin model of argumentation?
Evidence
Rebuttal
Claim
Qualifier
Consider the following argument.
Homeless people should be allowed to occupy unused buildings that are owned by others (commonly referred to as “squatting”), as there are an estimated 700 000 empty properties in England that could be used as shelter. Any right that owners may claim to property is superseded by the rights of homeless people to shelter, as the right to shelter is an inalienable human right. This right to shelter applies in almost all cases of unoccupied properties, but of course would not apply if the property was only unoccupied in the short term.
(Adapted from Vasudevan, A. (2011, November 3). The sinister logic behind criminalising squatting. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/nov/03/criminalising-squatting-law-trespass-homeless)
“The right to shelter is an inalienable human right” is which part of the Toulmin model of argumentation?
Backing
Claim
Evidence
Rebuttal
How is critique different from critical thinking?
It emphasizes questioning assumptions.
Critique sees individual issues as part of broader socio-political phenomena.
It has a stronger focus on the role of power and inequality.
It focusses on criticizing certain individuals.
Which of the following are characteristics JUST of critique?
Socially and politically active
A structural rather than just an individual worldview
Questioning assumptions
Focussing on power and inequality
A common focus of critique is on unjust ideologies. Which of the following views on unjust ideologies are features of critique, according to the lecture?
Unjust ideologies are only found in politics.
The influence of unjust ideologies can be seen in thinking and theory itself.
Unjust ideologies are created by individuals who want to control the people.
Unjust ideologies help maintain unequal power structures.
In which of the following faculties would you be more likely to find critique as a way of understanding and analyzing the world?
Biology
Education
Literary Studies
Computer Science
What do we mean when we say “reflective writing needs to be critical”?
In reflective writing, you need to consider your own biases, background and reasons for your actions.
In reflective writing, you need to judge yourself and your thoughts harshly.
You need to write about something that is important. Small, trivial matters aren’t critical, so you need to use an experience that had an impact on a lot of people.
In reflective writing you need to disagree with your past actions and show what you did wrong
In reflective writing you need to make connections between theory, research and practice.
You need to do research and reference theories and evidence in a piece of reflective writing.
True
False
Which of the following should you include in a reflection?
A detailed description of your day leading up the specific experience
Research and evidence
Possible answers or solutions
Questions about a topic, practice, theory or experience
Review and analysis of a topic, practice, theory or experience
Consider the following reflection from a university course in Education. Note that this particular reflection had a word limit of 200-550 words, and students were instructed to reflect on the idea of being a critically reflective teacher.
Stephen Brookfield (1995), in his analysis of why critical reflection is important to teaching, suggests that “an uncritical stance towards our practice sets us up for a lifetime of frustration” (para. 2). He suggests this is because teachers can have a different view of their classrooms to what is actually going on: they are unaware. This contradiction fascinates me. While on my prac placements, I was particularly conscious of this – lessons that I thought to be fantastic or boring, when looked at through a critical eye, turned out to be the opposite, or at least more in the middle. It was frustrating, to say the least. What we had learnt in our education theory courses didn’t quite match up to real-life experience. Having my supervisor give me notes at the end really helped me in evaluating my teaching and planning the next lesson. This, coupled with my own observations of my students allowed me to more closely align what Brookfield would call the “meaning and significance” (para 2) I intended for the lesson to what the students took from it. While being observed sometimes felt a bit “big brother” and sometimes just embarrassing, I have no doubt that it made me a better teacher. These kinds of ‘learning processes’ throughout a teaching career are important because they force us to revaluate our practice; to, in effect, become aware.
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, LA: Jossey-Bass.
Now, consider just this section: “While on my prac placements, I was particularly conscious of this – lessons that I thought to be fantastic or boring, when looked at through a critical eye, turned out to be the opposite, or at least more in the middle. It was frustrating, to say the least.”
Which stage of Baker’s (1996) critical reflection is this an example of?
Identification & description
Implications
Significance
Consider the same reflection from a university course in Education. Note that this particular reflection had a word limit of 200-550 words, and students were instructed to reflect on the idea of being a critically reflective teacher.
Stephen Brookfield (1995), in his analysis of why critical reflection is important to teaching, suggests that “an uncritical stance towards our practice sets us up for a lifetime of frustration” (para 2). He suggests this is because teachers can have a different view of their classrooms to what is actually going on: they are unaware. This contradiction fascinates me. While on my prac placements, I was particularly conscious of this – lessons that I thought to be fantastic or boring, when looked at through a critical eye, turned out to be the opposite, or at least more in the middle. It was frustrating, to say the least. What we had learnt in our education theory courses didn’t quite match up to real-life experience. Having my supervisor give me notes at the end really helped me in evaluating my teaching and planning the next lesson. This, coupled with my own observations of my students allowed me to more closely align what Brookfield would call the “meaning and significance” (para 2) I intended for the lesson to what the students took from it. While being observed sometimes felt a bit “big brother” and sometimes just embarrassing, I have no doubt that it made me a better teacher. These kinds of ‘learning processes’ throughout a teaching career are important because they force us to revaluate our practice; to, in effect, become aware.
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, LA: Jossey-Bass.
Now, consider just this section: “While being observed sometimes felt a bit “big brother” and sometimes just embarrassing, I have no doubt that it made me a better teacher. These kinds of ‘learning processes’ throughout a teaching career are important because they force us to revaluate our practice; to, in effect, become aware.”
Which stage of Baker’s (1996) critical reflection is this an example of?
Identification & description
Significance
Implications
Read the following argument. Which sentences are part of the argument chain?
(1) Better data on homelessness would ultimately contribute to a decrease in homelessness. (2) There is currently a need for a client information system that would help provide assessment, referrals and information sharing across the multiple homelessness services. (3) Improved communication across the different services would ensure that the clients’ needs are being addressed. (4) Moreover, improved data would help identify which services are most in demand. (5) If the in-demand services were identified then it would mean greater resources could be allocated to those areas. (6) This would allow for greater outreach to homeless people with services that they need. (7) If this was successful then it would mean more people experiencing homelessness received the support that they needed.
All of them
1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
1, 4, 5, 6 and 7
4, 5, 6 and 7
Read the following argument. Which sentence is the conclusion?
(1) Better data on homelessness would ultimately contribute to a decrease in homelessness. (2) There is currently a need for a client information system that would help provide assessment, referrals and information sharing across the multiple homelessness services. (3) Improved communication across the different services would ensure that the clients’ needs are being addressed. (4) Moreover, improved data would help identify which services are most in demand. (5) If the in-demand services were identified then it would mean greater resources could be allocated to those areas. (6) This would allow for greater outreach to homeless people with services that they need. (7) If this outreach was successful then it would mean more people experiencing homelessness received the support that they needed.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
For a piece of reflective writing, where should you begin?
With something you have recently learned
With an object
In front of the mirror
With an experience or event that raised questions or demonstrated a gap in your knowledge
Consider the following reflection from a university course in Education. Note that this particular reflection had a word limit of 200-550 words, and students were instructed to reflect on the idea of being a critically reflective teacher.
Stephen Brookfield (1995), in his analysis of why critical reflection is important to teaching, suggests that “an uncritical stance towards our practice sets us up for a lifetime of frustration” (para 2). He suggests this is because teachers can have a different view of their classrooms to what is actually going on: they are unaware. This contradiction fascinates me. While on my prac placements, I was particularly conscious of this – lessons that I thought to be fantastic or boring, when looked at through a critical eye, turned out to be the opposite, or at least more in the middle. It was frustrating, to say the least. What we had learnt in our education theory courses didn’t quite match up to real-life experience. Having my supervisor give me notes at the end really helped me in evaluating my teaching and planning the next lesson. This, coupled with my own observations of my students allowed me to more closely align what Brookfield would call the “meaning and significance” (para 2) I intended for the lesson to what the students took from it. While being observed sometimes felt a bit “big brother” and sometimes just embarrassing, I have no doubt that it made me a better teacher. These kinds of ‘learning processes’ throughout a teaching career are important because they force us to revaluate our practice; to, in effect, become aware.
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, LA: Jossey-Bass.
Which of the following sections of the text does the student talk about the significance of the event or experience?
While on my prac placements, I was particularly conscious of this – lessons that I thought to be fantastic or boring, when looked at through a critical eye, turned out to be the opposite, or at least more in the middle. It was frustrating, to say the least.
While being observed sometimes felt a bit “big brother” and sometimes just embarrassing, I have no doubt that it made me a better teacher. These kinds of ‘learning processes’ throughout a teaching career are important because they force us to re-evaluate our practice; to, in effect, become aware.
What we had learnt in our education theory courses didn’t quite match up to real-life experience. Having my supervisor give me notes at the end really helped me in evaluating my teaching and planning the next lesson. This, coupled with my own observations of my students allowed me to more closely align what Brookfield would call the “meaning and significance” (para 2) I intended for the lesson to what the students took from it.
Stephen Brookfield (1995), in his analysis of why critical reflection is important to teaching, suggests that “an uncritical stance towards our practice sets us up for a lifetime of frustration” (para 2). He suggests this is because teachers can have a different view of their classrooms to what is actually going on: they are unaware. This contradiction fascinates me.
Consider the following argument.
There are numerous examples of people struggling to remove squatters due to the inadequacy of the law. For example, Imran Lakhani, despite finding squatters on his property while working overseas, struggled for 6 months to remove the squatters in his house. Dale Morrison faced similar issues too when she and her family returned from holiday to find squatters in their house. These cases clearly demonstrate that laws against squatting on private property should be tightened. Of course, these changes would only apply to private property to retain people’s right to protest on public land.
Which of the following statements from this text is the Claim?
There is none.
“There are numerous examples of people struggling to remove squatters due to the inadequacy of the law.”
“These cases clearly demonstrate that laws against squatting on private property should be tightened.”
“… these changes would only apply to private property to retain people’s right to protest on public land.”
Consider the following argument.
There are numerous examples of people struggling to remove squatters due to the inadequacy of the law. For example, Imran Lakhani, despite finding squatters on his property while working overseas, struggled for 6 months to remove the squatters in his house. Dale Morrison faced similar issues too when she and her family returned from holiday to find squatters in their house. These cases clearly demonstrate that laws against squatting on private property should be tightened. Of course, these changes would only apply to private property to retain people’s right to protest on public land.
Which of the following statements from this text is the Warrant?
There is none.
“… these changes would only apply to private property to retain people’s right to protest on public land.”
“There are numerous examples of people struggling to remove squatters due to the inadequacy of the law.”
These cases clearly demonstrate that laws against squatting on private property should be tightened.”
Consider the following fictional newspaper article.
Homeless man Mike Davis pulled himself back on his feet with some hard work in his new microbusiness, cleaning local restaurants and bars. While his microbusiness might have given him a newfound sense of dignity, along with a few dollars, Mike confessed to his case manager Susan Lee at New Choices Welfare that he still had a unfulfilled dream – to find his long-lost sister in the city of Bramingham. That’s when Susan, in conjunction with Flyaway Travel, worked to make Mike’s dream a reality …
A cultural studies theorist critiques the article in the following way.
Another example of the responsibilisation of homelessness can be seen in an article in the Southern Messenger (Diaz, 2011). A narrative of individual self-help, supported by the newspaper’s advertisers, is told, ignoring the broader systemic nature of homelessness.
Which feature of critique, outlined in lesson 5.3a, can be found in the theorist’s writing?
Unjust ideologies maintain unequal power structures.
The university is an agent of change rather than just a place to transmit thought.
Theory is never neutral, but either maintains or challenges unequal power structures.
A structural worldview is needed, where individual issues are socio-political phenomena.
Consider the following fictional newspaper article.
Homeless man Mike Davis pulled himself back on his feet with some hard work in his new microbusiness, cleaning local restaurants and bars. While his microbusiness might have given him a newfound sense of dignity, along with a few dollars, Mike confessed to his case manager Susan Lee at New Choices Welfare that he still had a unfulfilled dream – to find his long-lost sister in the city of Bramingham. That’s when Susan, in conjunction with Flyaway Travel, worked to make Mike’s dream a reality …
A cultural studies theorist continues critiquing the article in the following way.
Narratives of individual responsibility, such as the Southern Messenger article, serve to redirect blame towards the homeless for their fate. This ideology then reinforces how the broader housing system, that prioritizes the exchange-value of houses on the market rather than their use-value as accommodation, creates a homeless underclass.
Which feature of critique, outlined in lesson 5.3a, can be found in the theorist’s writing?
The university is an agent of change rather than just a place to transmit thought.
Unjust ideologies maintain unequal power structures.
Theory is never neutral, but either maintains or challenges unequal power structures.
A structural worldview is needed, where individual issues are socio-political phenomena.
