WorksheetsUnit 3 Civil Liberties and Civil Rights [AP Gov]
Total questions: 96
Worksheet time: 48mins
Which of the following best explains why the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment has been called by some political scientists as a second revolution?
The Bill of Rights were no longer subject to court interpretation
The Bill of Rights were weakened
Government power was centralized, weakening traditional federalism
Government power was decentralized, strengthening state and local governments
Where would you find the words below?
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or
immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person
of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
10th Amendment
14th Amendment
16th Amendment
24th Amendment
What constitutional clause did the Supreme Court use to justify selective incorporation, applying provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states?
Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment
Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Necessary and Proper Clause
The arc of American government is a story characterized by
Centralization
. De-centralization
Centrifugal tendencies
. Increasing state and regional power
Why is the Incorporation Doctrine often called selective incorporation?
The Supreme Court has applied the Bill of Rights little by little
The Supreme Court has applied the Bill of Rights only in non-election years
The Supreme Court has applied the Bill of Rights when encouraged by Democratic presidents
The Supreme Court has applied the Bill of Rights one state at a time
Ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court is empowered to interpret what our laws and privileges mean. A number of landmark court cases have defined the meaning of our rights. Which of the following landmark court cases used the incorporation doctrine to extend the right to an attorney in State cases?
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court is empowered to interpret what our laws and privileges mean. A number of landmark court cases have defined the meaning of our rights. Which of the following landmark court cases defined privacy as a fundamental legal protection found implicitly in the Bill of Rights?
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court is empowered to interpret what our laws and privileges mean. A number of landmark court cases have defined the meaning of our rights. Which of the following landmark court cases extended privacy rights to include a woman’s right to choose an abortion?
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
Roe v. Wade (1973)
Where in the U.S. Constitution did the Supreme Court explicitly find the right to privacy?
Privacy is not mentioned in the Constitution
Fourteenth Amendment
Ninth Amendment
Third Amendment
In addition to advancing personal liberties, the Fourteenth Amendment has often been used to support social movements as well. If personal liberties were advanced by “due process,” social movements were advanced by
“Estoppel” protections
“Habeas corpus”
“Equal protection”
“Eminent domain”
___________ protects individuals and their individual rights. ___________ protects groups and their equal treatment.
Civil liberties; civil rights
Civil rights; civil liberties
Civil liberties; eminent domain
Civil rights; eminent domain
Our form of democratic-republicanism upholds majority rules while putting in place protections for minority rights. When rights are extended to minority groups as a whole it is often referred to as
Civil Rights
Social Contracts
Collective Bargaining
Civil Societies
African-Americans found their quest for civil rights both daunting and frustrating. Jim Crow laws in the South relegated them to second-class citizens. In which political arena did AfricanAmericans find their earliest civil rights successes?
State and local governments
The federal judicial branch
The federal executive branch
The federal legislative branch
Civil rights has been extended in a number of Supreme Court landmark cases. In which case would you read the following opinion:
“ We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.”
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
Which of the following acts of the U.S. Congress outlawed discrimination in public
accommodations based upon race?
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
The Civil Rights Act of 1964
The Voting Rights Act of 1965
Baker v. Carr (1962)
African-Americans were not the only marginalized groups to win political victories in the wake of the civil rights movement. Title IX of the Education Amendments in 1972
Prohibited any form of discrimination on the basis of age in educational activities
Prohibited any form of discrimination on the basis of religion in educational activities
Prohibited any form of discrimination on the basis of gender in educational activities
Prohibited any form of discrimination on the basis of ethnicity in educational activities
Martin Luther King, Jr.’s essay Letter from a Birmingham Jail (1993) inspired many to fight for greater equality. King’s personal message in this essay can be distilled down to
“We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are equal.”
“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
“Racism is still with us.”
“I am for violence if non-violence means we continue postponing a solution.”
Women as well saw their liberties improved during the civil rights movement thanks in part to a number of outspoken leaders. Betty Friedan and others founded the advocacy group
The National Organization of Women (NOW)
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce
The American Federation of Labor (AFL)
Americans for Democratic Action (ADA)
. __________ segregation is segregation by law and _____________ segregation is segregation by private choice.
De jure; de facto
De facto; de jure
. De jure; de bistro
De bistro; de facto
Public policy promoting civil rights is influenced by citizen-state interactions and constitutional interpretation over time. There have been times when the state coercively acted to prevent full equality. In this case the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that “separate but equal” was constitutionally protected
Barren v. Baltimore (1833)
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
Roe v. Wade (1973)
The early civil rights movement in the 1950s found its greatest successes
in the courts
through legislative action
via federal mandates
by way of executive action
Segregation, discrimination and prejudice in places of commerce would no longer be accepted due to this historic piece of legislation:
The European Recovery Program (1948)
. Civil Rights Act of 1964
The Voting Rights Act of 1965
The Motor Voter Bill (1993)
African-Americans were not the only marginalized groups to win political victories in the wake of the civil rights movement. One of the more notable victories occurred for women with this law that prohibited any form of discrimination on the basis of gender in any education program or activity
The Voting Rights Act of 1965
The Equal Rights Amendment
NOW
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972
Which of the following best explains the role federalism plays on the extension of civil rights?
Federalism often accelerates the extension of civil rights
. Federalism often delays and complicates the extension of civil rights
Federalism often plays no role in the extension of civil rights
. Federalism explains why the civil rights movement was successful
Rules to suppress black political participation through literacy tests were outlawed in this historical piece of legislation
The European Recovery Program (1948)
Civil Rights Act of 1964
The Voting Rights Act of 1965
The Motor Voter Bill (1993)
“No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” This text is most likely an excerpt from what historic civil rights law?
The Voting Rights Act of 1965
The Equal Rights Amendment
The Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972
The “separate but equal” precedent was established in this landmark civil rights case
Barron v. Baltimore (1833)
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
The “separate but equal” precedent was overturned in this landmark civil rights case
Barron v. Baltimore (1833)
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
What constitutional clause has the Supreme Court used to justify the extension of civil rights to all citizens in every state?
Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment
Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Necessary and Proper Clause
This “civil rights policy premised on the concept of group rather than individual rights, which seeks equality of results rather than equality of opportunity.”
Eminent domain
Affirmative action
Devolution
Plea bargain
Which of the following best describes recent trends in the Court’s interpretation of affirmative action precedent?
The Court seems to be weakening previous affirmative action precedent
The Court seems to be strengthening previous affirmative action precedent
The Court no longer hears affirmative action cases due to “settled law”
The Court has deferred affirmative action policy to state and local governments
Affirmative Action is typically supported by
Liberal Democrats
Conservative Republicans
Libertarians
Affirmative Action has little opposition
. This government policy aims at achieving racial and gender balance
Head Start
NAFTA
. Federal Pell grants
Affirmative Action
Those who oppose affirmative action claim that constitutional equality means a government policy of
Indifference
Colorblindness
Economic independence
Majoritarianism
Affirmative action programs were put in place to offer racial minorities a chance to catch up for past discrimination. Which of the following would be an example of a constitutionally protected affirmative action program?
Racial quotas on university campuses
Reserved seats on the United States Supreme Court for black judges
Congressional districts drawn to assure African-American representatives
Race used as one factor in determining promotion in police and fire departments
Civil rights protections have proven to be a dynamic force throughout American history. At times they have been restrictive and at other times more permissive. Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) upheld state laws that prohibited same sex activities. More recently, in this case state laws banning same sex marriage were overturned
Johnson v. Santa Clara (1987)
Fisher v. Texas (2013)
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
Civil liberties are constitutionally established guarantees and freedoms that protect citizens, opinions and property against arbitrary government interference. Which of the following would be an example of arbitrary governmental interference?
Governments limiting the use of obscenity
A court approval of a legal search warrant
A law establishing a religious test for civic participation
Meat inspection laws
In the Bill of Rights you would find the following language: A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. These words would be found in the
1st Amendment
2nd Amendment
4th Amendment
6th Amendment
The U.S. Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) argued:
Undoubtedly some think that the Second Amendment is outmoded in a society where our standing army is the pride of our Nation, where well-trained police forces provide personal security, and where gun violence is a serious problem. That is perhaps debatable, but what is not debatable is that it is not the role of this Court to pronounce the Second Amendment extinct.
What was the pragmatic effect of this court precedent?
The 2nd Amendment still allows for strict prohibitions against private gun ownership
. The 2nd Amendment does not endorse violence but it does mandate a strong standing army
The 2nd Amendment empowers state militias only
The 2nd Amendment extends the right to own handguns to individuals
In this case the Supreme Court made sure that state and local laws no longer infringed upon a citizens’ right to bear arms
District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
When the Supreme Court applied the national protections to “bear arms” to the states, what root principle of government was challenged?
Separation of Powers
Checks and Balances
Federalism
Rule of law
Who ultimately decides what the “right to bear arms” means?
Congress
the President
The Courts
Electoral College
In response to a summer of violence, the city of Chicago and its city council decided to restrict gun shops from selling certain types of ammunition in order to protect neighborhoods. A Chicago resident, an owner of a gun shop, sued the city claiming its new policy violated the precedent in this case
District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Which of the following is a common criticism given for applying a universal 2nd Amendment standard to all 50-states?
State governments were unable to tailor gun laws to their own unique populations
State governments were unable to keep up with the Court always changing their opinions
The national government laws should never be applied to the states
The Bill of Rights was only meant to be a suggestion, not followed literally
Provisions of the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights are continually being interpreted to balance the power of
The civil liberties of individuals and the civil liberties of corporations
Government’s promise to secure order and the civil liberties of individuals
The U.S. government and the power of foreign governments
Government and the civil rights of government employees
All of the following amendments provide constitutional protection to the rights of the accused EXCEPT
First Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Eighth Amendment
Sixth Amendment
Where in the U.S. Constitution would you find: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”
First Amendment
Third Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Sixth Amendment
The Bill of Rights contains many diverse protections. In addition to political rights like speech and press they also protect us from oppressive police powers. All of the following is protected in the Bill of Rights EXCEPT:
Protected from being filmed by police
Secure against unreasonable searches and seizures
Right to an attorney
Free from cruel and unusual punishments
Ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court is empowered to interpret what our laws and privileges mean. A number of landmark court cases have defined the meaning of our rights. Which of the following landmark court cases incorporated the exclusionary rule?
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Privacy rights would appear to be one of our basic freedoms. In our lifetime our privacy rights have been compromised due to fear of further terrorist attacks. Congress has formally compromised our individual privacy rights through the passage of
Dodd-Frank
Federal Property Reform Act
The Patriot and USA Freedom Acts
Inspector General Empowerment Act
Among other things the Bill of Rights protects private property. Yet governments can take private property for “public use” as long as “fair compensation” is given. This Fifth Amendment protection is called
Necessary and Proper
Ex Post Facto
Exclusionary Rule
Eminent Domain
Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 51: If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions. Which of the following statements best summarizes Hamilton’s argument?
Both the citizens and the government need to be checked and limited
Governments primary job is to check its citizens in order to secure order
The object of government is to create angels
People depend on the government but the government does not depend on the people
he police entered Tom’s apartment without a legal warrant based upon an informant’s tip that illegal drugs were present. Drugs were found. At trial the judge agreed with Tom’s attorney who claimed the evidence was inadmissible. What legal principle did the judge base her opinion on
The establishment clause
The exclusionary rule
Eminent domain
Ex Post Facto Laws
“Pleading the Fifth” has become almost cliché. Which of the following best exemplifies this practice?
Despite pressure from the police, Tom remained silent during questioning.
Officer Friendly must first obtain a legal warrant to enter Tom’s house.
Tom was provided an attorney even though he could not afford one.
Tom’s execution was granted a stay due to his persuasive arguments.
. When more and more state legislatures limit capital punishment what principle of our government is exemplified?
Separation of powers
. Checks and balances
Federalism
Limited government
The Selective Incorporation Doctrine shifted responsibility to the national government in a dramatic way. This power grab has resulted in all of the following EXCEPT
Individual rights and liberties have been more thoroughly protected
The Bill of Rights is now efficacious in each individual state
State criminal codes were replaced by federal criminal codes
The national government has become stronger
Before being selectively incorporated, the Second Amendment
Could not prevent states from passing restrictive gun control laws
Could not adequately arm militias
Did not apply to citizens
Did not prevent Congress from passing restrictive gun control laws
Ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court is empowered to interpret what our laws and privileges mean. A number of landmark court cases have defined the meaning of our rights. Which of the following landmark court cases extended the Second Amendment’s right “to bear arms” to the states using the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)
Some have called the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment as equivalent to having a second constitutional convention. Why?
Many of the earlier amendments were rendered null and void
The legislative branch forfeited its “law making” power to the Supreme Court
The commerce clause was elevated in its authority over state and local governments
The national government assumed more authority over state and local governments.
The extension of the Bill of Rights to the States is called
Full faith and credit
Selective incorporation
Privileges and immunities
Judicial review
Some have called the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment as equivalent to having a second constitutional convention. The national government assumed more authority over state and local governments. What governing principles were advanced with the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Due process and equal protection
Eminent domain and separation of powers
Federalism and popular sovereignty
Equal protection and direct election of Senators
Where in the U.S. Constitution would you find: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Fourteenth Amendment
Sixteenth Amendment
Eighteenth Amendment
Twenty-Second Amendment
Today virtually all of our civil liberties as guaranteed in the Bill of Rights have been applied to the States. What legal principle has the Supreme Court used to apply the Bill of Rights to the States?
Due process
Equal protection
Eminent domain
Exclusionary rule
Ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court is empowered to interpret what our laws and privileges mean. A number of landmark court cases have defined the meaning of our rights. Which of the following landmark court cases used the incorporation doctrine to extend the right to an attorney in State cases?
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
What resulted from “selective incorporation”?
Little by little the Bill of Rights were applied to the states
Little by little the presidency grew in power
Little by little the Articles of Confederation were changed
Little by little the new constitution was ratified
A person was arrested and the police detectives immediately started asking questions about the crime committed. The accused person was very nervous, but started answering the questions. Later the accused person's lawyer challenged the evidence collected, because one of their liberties wasn't protected- which liberty was it?
Right to not self-incriminate, plead the fifth
Freedom of speech
Right to be free from an unreasonable search
No cruel and unusual punishment
Which of the following liberties is NOT found in the first amendment?
Freedom of Religion
Freedom of the Press
Freedom to have an attorney
Freedom of Speech
Which liberty/amendment was incorporated as a result of the Supreme Court ruling in McDonald v Chicago?
Freedom of Speech/1st
Right to bear arms/2nd
Right to remain silent/5th
Due Process/14th
The Bill of Rights were added to our U.S. Constitution primarily to
Expose the Anti-Federalists as frauds
Demonstrate the malleability of the U.S. Constitution
Protect individual liberties and rights
Ease a political dispute at the Constitutional convention
Civil liberties are constitutionally established guarantees and freedoms that protect citizens, opinions and property against arbitrary government interference. Which of the following would be an example of arbitrary governmental interference?
Meat inspection laws
A law establishing a religious test for civic participation
A court approval of a legal search warrant
Governments limiting the use of obscenity
. In the Bill of Rights you would find the following language: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. These words would be found in the
The Sixth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment
The Second Amendment
The First Amendment
In the Bill of Rights you would find the following language: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. These words would be found in the
. The Sixth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment
The Second Amendment
The First Amendment
In the Bill of Rights you would find the following language: A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. These words would be found in the
The Sixth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment
. The Second Amendment
The First Amendment
In the Bill of Rights you would find the following language: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. These words would be found in the
The Tenth Amendment
The Eighth Amendment
The Fifth Amendment
. The Fourth Amendment
In the Bill of Rights you would find the following language: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. These words would be found in the
The Tenth Amendment
The Eighth Amendment
The Fifth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment
In the Bill of Rights you would find the following language: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. These words would be found in the
The Fifth Amendment
The Tenth Amendment
The Eighth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment
The first Congress added a Bill of Rights to the original Constitution. The Bill of Rights was added to increase the loyalty of the people. What fundamental worry did the Bill of Rights address?
State governments with not enough power
A national government that could not tax
A central government that was too weak
A national government that was too strong
The primary goal of the Bill of Rights when it was ratified was to
Itemize the peoples’ fundamental liberties
Divide power between federal and state governments
Increase the power of the central government
Limit the power of the central government
Two clauses of the First Amendment deal with our religious liberty. They are
Prohibition and establishment
Separation and establishment
Free exercise and establishment
Free exercise and separation
. In Engel vs. Vitale (1962) the Supreme Court faced severe criticism for ruling this practice unconstitutional.
Bibles available in public libraries
Public school prayer
Tax credits for private schools
Proselytizing on street corners
What constitutional clause did the Supreme Court use to rule in the Engel case?
Necessary and proper clause
Free Speech Clause
Establishment Clause
Free Excercise
In this case the Supreme Court ruled that the Amish, a religious group, was exempt from complying with compulsory education attendance laws.
Lemon vs. Kurtzman (1971)
Employment Division vs. Smith (1990)
Wisconsin vs. Yoder (1972)
Everson vs. Board of Education (1947)
What constitutional clause did the Supreme Court use to allow religious exemptions to certain state laws?
Necessary and proper clause
Free Speech clause
Establishment clause
Free Exercise clause
Which of the following civil liberties have been granted a preferred position by the U.S. Supreme Court?
Freedom of press
Freedom of speech
Freedom of religion
Freedom of assembly
Which of the following protections would NOT be found in the First Amendment?
Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Assembly
Free of the Press
Freedom from Unreasonable Searches
. As much as we value free speech, courts have recognized limits. Which of the following would not be constitutionally protected free speech?
Publishing obscene materials
Wearing arm bands in school to protest a war
Shouting criticisms of the president in public
Joining the Communist Party
Justice Holmes famously wrote in this court opinion, “…Free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater.” The ruling precedent of this case established the clear and present danger standard.
Tinker vs. Des Moines
Brandenburg vs. Ohio (1969)
Schenck vs. U.S. (1919)
Employment Division vs. Smith (1990)
The defining limit on free speech today, according to this court case, is imminent lawlessness
Tinker vs. Des Moines
Employment Division vs. Smith (1990)
Schenck vs. U.S. (1919)
Brandenburg vs. Ohio (1969)
Do students lose their rights when they walk through the schoolhouse gate? In this case the court said no.
Tinker vs. Des Moines
Brandenburg vs. Ohio (1969)
Schenck vs. U.S. (1919)
Employment Division vs. Smith (1990)
Freedom of speech has been extended to children inside the schoolhouse gate. Yet there are limits. In the case Morse vs. Frederick (2007) the Supreme Court did not protect a student’s right to
Speak out against school inequalities
Protest war
Advocate drug use
Assemble to raise awareness about the environment
Free speech, according to the courts, also protects symbolic speech. An example of symbolic speech would be
Wearing arm bands to protest a war
Speaking out against unfair hiring policies
Signing a petition to make voting easier
Posting quotes in a chat room
Though this case permitted the controversial Pentagon Papers to be printed, the Court recognized that our freedom of the press could be limited by national security
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Everson v. Board of Education (1947)
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
New York Times v. U.S. (1971)
Prior restraint is another name fo
sanction
censorship
encouragement
proof read
. There is a heavy presumption against the government limiting a free press. Which of the following scenarios would likely meet that standard, allowing the government to limit the press?
Troop positions during war
Embarrassing mistakes made by the president in a speech
Corruption inside the White House
Vaccine test results during a pandemic
