Font size
WorksheetsGEMS
Total questions: 108
Worksheet time: 56mins
What is the internal validity of HM's Case Study
Low
High
Construct Validity of HM's Case study?
High
Low
What is the external validity of HM's Case Study
Low
High
What is the population validity of HM's Case Study
Low
High
Ecological Validity of HM's Case study?
High
Low
Researcher Bias in HM's Case study
Yes High
No
Participant Bias in HM Case Study
No
Yes
Ethical Considerations in HMs Case Study
Informed Consent
Debriefing
Physical Harm
HM's Case Study Sampling
Purposive
Opoortunity
Snowball
Maguire et al. Quasi Experiment's external validity
High
Low
Maguire et al. Quasi Experiment's internal validity?
High
Low
Maguire et al. Quasi Experiment's Construct Validity
High
Low
Maguire et al. Quasi Experiment's Population Validity
High
Low
Maguire et al. Quasi Experiment's ecological validity
Low
High
Maguire et al. Quasi Experiment's Researcher Bias
NO
YES
Maguire et al. Quasi Experiment's participant bias
Yes
No
Maguire et al. Quasi Experiment's sampling method
Opportunity
Purposive
Rogers and Kesner Lab experiment's Internal Validity
High
Low
Rogers and Kesner Lab experiment's construct Validity
High
Low
Rogers and Kesner Lab experiment's external validity
High
Low
Rogers and Kesner Lab experiment's ecological validity
high
low
Rogers and Kesner Lab experiment's population validity
Low
High
Rogers and Kesner Lab experiment's sampling method
Purposive
Snowball
Opportunity
Rogers and Kesner Lab experiment's ethical consideration is
(a)
Antonova Lab Experiment's Population Validity
Low
High
Antonova Lab Experiment's Ecological Validity
Low
High
Antonova Lab Experiment's Construct Validity
Low
High
Antonova Lab Experiment's External Validity
High
Low
Antonova Lab Experiment's Internal Validity
High
Low
Antonova Lab Experiment's Sampling method
Opportunity
Purposive
Snowball
Antonova Lab Experiment's ethical considerations
Psychological Harm permanent
Psychological harm temporary
physical harm permanent
physical harm temporary
Antonova Lab Experiment's Researcher Bias
yes
no
Antonova Lab Experiment's participant bias
yes
no
Rosenzweig, Bennet and Diamond Lab experiment's construct validity
high
low
Rosenzweig, Bennet and Diamond Lab experiment's internal validity
high
low
Rosenzweig, Bennet and Diamond Lab experiment's external validity
high
low
Rosenzweig, Bennet and Diamond Lab experiment's population validity
high
low
Rosenzweig, Bennet and Diamond Lab experiment's ecological validity
high
low
Rosenzweig, Bennet and Diamond Lab experiment's sampling method
opportunity
purposive
Rosenzweig, Bennet and Diamond Lab experiment's researcher bias
yes
no
Rosenzweig, Bennet and Diamond Lab experiment's participant bias
yes
no
n/a
Rosenzweig, Bennet and Diamond Lab experiment's ethics
Psych to some
physical to all
psych to all
physical to some
physical to all
psych to some
Draganski Lab experiment's construct validity
high
low
Draganski Lab experiment's Internal Validity
high
low
Draganski Lab experiment's ecological validity
high
low
Draganski Lab experiment's population validity
high
low
Draganski Lab experiment's external validity?
high
low
Draganski Lab experiment's researcher bias
yes
no
Draganski Lab experiment's participant bias
yes
no
present
Draganski Lab experiment's sampling method
opportunity
purposive
self selected
Newcomer et al Lab experiment's construct validity
high
low
Newcomer et al Lab experiment's Internal Validity
high
low
Newcomer et al Lab experiment's ecological validity
high
low
Newcomer et al Lab experiment's population validity
high
low
Newcomer et al Lab experiment's external validity?
high
low
Newcomer Lab Experiment Researcher bias
(a)
Newcomer Lab Experiment Participant bias
(a)
Newcomer Lab Experiment's ethical considerations
Psychological Harm permanent
Psychological harm temporary
physical harm permanent
physical harm temporary
Newcomer Lab Experiment's sampling method
purposive
self selected
opportunity
Meaney et al Lab experiment's Construct Validity
High
Low
Meaney et al Lab experiment's Internal Validity
High
Low
Meaney et al Lab experiment's Population Validity
Yes
No
N/A
Meaney et al Lab experiment's external validity
high
low
Meaney et al Lab experiment's ecological validity
high
low
Meaney et al Lab experiment's Researcher Bias
Yes
No
Meaney et al Lab experiment's sampling method
opportunity
snowballing
purposive
Meaney et al Lab experiment's ethical consideration is
(a)
Wedekind et al Lab experiment's Internal Validity
Low
High
Wedekind et al Lab experiment's External validity
Low
High
Wedekind et al Lab experiment's ecological validity
low
high
Wedekind et al Lab experiment's construct validity
low
high
Wedekind et al Lab experiment's population validity
low
high
Wedekind et al Lab experiment's ethical considerations
debriefed afterwards
deception used
psychological harm due to disgust sensitivity
physical harm due to disgust sensitivity
Wedekind et al Lab experiment's sampling method
opportunity
self selected
purposive
Cutler et al Field experiment's internal validity
low
high
Cutler et al Field experiment's external validity
high
low
Cutler et al Field experiment's construct validity
high
low
Cutler et al Field experiment's ecological validity
high
low
Cutler et al Field experiment's population validity
high
low
Cutler et al Field experiment's ethical consideration
deception
deception
informed consent
invasion of privacy
Cutler et al Field experiment's sampling method
opportunity
purposive
self selected
Is there researcher bias in Cutler et al Field experiment
YES YES YES
NO NONO
is there participant bias in Cutler et al Field experiment
yes
low
high
no
Ronay et al Field experiment's ecological validity
high
low
Ronay et al Field experiment's internal validity
high
low
Ronay et al Field experiment's construct validity
high
low
Ronay et al Field experiment's population validity
high
low
Ronay et al Field experiment's external validity
high
low
Ronay et al Field experiment's researcher bias?
yes
no
Ronay et al Field experiment's participant bias
yes
no
Ronay et al Field experiment's sampling method
self selected
purposive
opportunity
Ronay et al Field experiment's ethical consideration
deception
informed consent
physical harm
Kendler et al Interviews' Internal validity?
High
Low
Kendler Interviews' Construct Validity
high
low
Kendler Interviews' ecological validity
high
low
Kendler Interviews' population validity
high
low
Kendler Interviews' external validity
high
low
Kendler Interviews' research and participant bias
R YES
P NO
R NO
P NO
R YES
P YES
R NO
P YES
Kendler Interviews' sampling method
purposive
opportunity
Kendler Interviews' ethical consideration
Undue stress
Psych Harm
Informed Consent
Weisman et al Case Study's Internal Validity
high
low
Weisman et al Case Study's population validity
high
low
Weisman et al Case Study's construct validity
high
low
Weisman et al Case Study's ecological validity
high
low
Weisman et al Case Study's external validity
high
low
Weisman et al Case Study's Researcher and Participant Bias
R NO
P YES
R YES
P NO
R NO
P NO
R YES
P YES
Weisman et al Case Study's ethical consideration
undue stress
informed consent
debriefing
Weisman et al Case Study's Sampling method
opportunity
purposive
