wayground logo

Free Printable Worksheets

Font size

S
M
L
XL
Worksheets

Cases

Total questions: 44

Worksheet time: 23mins

Name
Class
Date
1.

Chapter 6: incorporation of compan - Availability of name

a)

Solomon v A Solomon Co. & Ltd (1897)

b)

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia & Anor) [2014]

c)

Chitty J in Levy v Abercorns 7 Slab Co.

d)

Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961]

2.

S.27(5)

a)

Ammonia Soda Co Ltd v Chamberlain

b)

Re Spanish Prospecting Co (1911)

c)

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia & Anor)

d)

Totex - Adon Pty Ltd v Marco

3.

Availability of name

a)

Re Benjamin Cope and Sons Ltd

b)

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia & Anor) [2014]

c)

Evans v Rival Granite Quarries Ltd [1910]

d)

Pender v Lushington [1877]

4.

Incorporation of company - Availabillity of name

a)

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia & Anor) [2014]

b)

North-West Transportation Co.Ltd v Beatty [1887]

c)

Re Kong Thai Swamills Sdn Bhd

d)

Industrial Equity Ltd v Blackburn

5.

Court held that the word 'Angkasa was not descriptive of any business and as such no one ought to monopoly over the usage of particular word as a trade name.

a)

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia & Ors)

b)

Barron v Parter (1914)

c)

Boardman v Phipps [1967]

d)

Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver

6.

S.20 Power of body corporate

a)

Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961]

b)

Foss v Harbottle [1843]

c)

Macaura v Nothern Assurance Co Ltd

d)

Re Noel Tedman Holding Pty Ltd [1967]

7.

S.21 (1) (a) To sue and be sued

a)

Re Noel Tedman Holdings Pty Ltd

b)

Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961]

c)

Macaura v Nothern Assurance Co. Ltd

d)

Foss v Harbottle [1843]

8.

S21(1) a & b

a)

Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961]

b)

Re Noel Tedman Holdings Pty Ltd [1967]

c)

Foss v Harbottle [1843]

d)

Macaura v Nothern Assurance Co Ltd

9.

S.21(1) b - To acquire, own, hold, develop or dispose of any property

a)

Macaura v Nothern Assurance Co.Ltd

b)

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Syarikat Malaysia & Anor) [2014]

c)

Re Noel Tedman Holding Pty Ltd [1967]

d)

Foss v Harbottle [1843]

10.

S.20 (a) Separate legal entity

a)

Re Noel Tedman Holdings Pty Ltd [1967]

b)

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia & Anor]

c)

Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961]

d)

Gilford Motor Co. v Horner (1933)

11.

Section 33(1)

a)

Aspatra Sdn Bhd v BBMB

b)

Lim Kar Bee v Duofortis Properties (M) Sdn Bhd

c)

Hickman v Kent

d)

Hotel Jaya Puri Bhd v National Union Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers

12.

Hickman v Kent

a)

Effect of constitution

b)

Effect of incorporation

c)

Incorporation of company

d)

Judicial Exception

13.

Aspatra Sdn Bhd v BBMB

a)

Effect of constitution

b)

Effect of incorporation

c)

Judicial Exception

d)

Availability of name

14.

When the company is employed as an agent / alter ego to its members

a)

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia & Anor) [2014]

b)

Aspatra Sdn Bhd v BBMB

c)

Gilford Motor Co. v Horne {[1933]

d)

Foss v Harbottle

15.

When the company is employed to evade legal obligation or to commit fraud

a)

Aspatra Sdn Bhd v BBMB

b)

Re Noel Tedman Holdings Pty Ltd [1967]

c)

Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961]

d)

Gilford Motor Co. v Horne [1933]

16.

Evading tax payment

a)

Lim Kar Bee v Duofortis Properties (M) Sdn Bhd

b)

Hickman v Kent

c)

Hotel Jaya Puri Bhd v National Union Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers

d)

Gilford Motor Co. v Horne [1933]

17.

Hotel Jaya Puri Bhd v National Union Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers

a)

Availability of name

b)

Perpetual Succesion

c)

When in certain situations, it involves group of companies which has been treated as single corporate entity

d)

Effect of constitution

18.

Judicial Exceptions

a)

Hotel Jaya Puri Bhd v National Union of Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers

b)

Gilford Motor Co. v Horne [1933]

c)

Hickman v Kent

d)

Macaura v Nothern Assurance Co. Ltd.

19.

Aspatra Sdn Bhd v BBMB, Lim Kar Bee v Duofortis Properties (M) Sdn Bhd

a)

Effects of constitution

b)

Effect of incorporation

c)

Judicial Exception

d)

Statutory Exception

20.

Re Spanish Prospecting Co [1911]

a)

What is profit?

b)

Dividend may be declared from increases in circulating capital without providing losses of fixed assests

c)

Shareholder can not compel a distribution of dividends

d)

Dividend may be declared from current financial year profits despite lossess of circulating capital in previous years.

21.

Dividend may be declared from increases in circulating capital without providing for losses of fixed capital.

a)

Ammonia Soda Co Ltd b Chamberlain

b)

Hilton International v Hilton [1988]

c)

Marra Development Ltd v B.W. Rofe Pty Ltd

d)

Lee v Neuchatel Asphalte Co ; Verner v General & Commercial Investment

22.

Lubbock v British Bank of South America

a)

Profit used for paying dividend must come from company's profits

b)

Dividend cannot be declared unless company gain profit when declaration of dividend is made

c)

Dividend may be declared from a profit arising from thesale of fixed assets

d)

Dividend cannot be declared if this would result in he comany being unable to pay its debt as they fall due (insolvent)

23.

Industrial Equity Ltd v Blackburn

a)

Shareholders cannot compel a distribution of dividends

b)

Profit used for paying dividend must come from company's profit.

c)

Dividend may be declared from the increases in circulating capital without providing for losses of fixed assets.

d)

Dividend cannot be declared if this would result in the company being unable to pay its debt as they fall due (insolvent)

24.

Dividend cannot be declared if this would result in the company being unable to pay its debt as they fall due (insolvent)

a)

Industrial Equity Ltd v Blackburn

b)

North-West Transportation Co Ltd v Beatty (1887)

c)

Lim Kar Bee v Duofortis Properties (M) Sdn Bhd

d)

Hilton International v Hilton [1988]

25.

Dividend may be declared from current financial year profits despite losses of circulationg capital in previous year.

a)

Ammonia Soda Co Ltd v Chamberlain

b)

Hilton International v Hilton [1988]

c)

Lee v Neuchatel Asphalte Co ; Verner v General & Commercial Investment

d)

Marra Development Ltd v B.W. Rofe Pty Ltd

26.

Burland v Earle [1902]

a)

What is profit?

b)

Shareholder cannot compel a distribution of dividends

c)

Profit used for paying dividend must come from company's profits.

d)

Dividend may be declared from profit arising from the sale of fixed assets

27.

Rules relating to the payment of dividend

a)

Shareholder cannot compel a distribution of dividends

b)

Dividend cannot be declared unless company gain profits when declaration of dividend is made

c)

Dividend may be declared from increases in circulating capital without providing for losses of fixed capital

d)

Dividend may be declared from current financial year profits despite losses circulating capital in previous years.

28.

Chitty J in Levy v Abercorris Slate 7 Slab Co [1887]

a)

Floating Charge

b)

Fixed vs Floating Charge

c)

Crystallization of fixed charges

d)

Debenture

29.

Johore Para Rubber Co Ltd v Registrar of Company

a)

Registered charges have priority in order of registration with the registrar

b)

Negative pledges

c)

Registration of charges

d)

Fixed vs floating charge

30.

S.352 (1)

a)

Johore Para Rubber Co Ltd v Registar of Companies

b)

Re Benjamin Cope and Sons Ltd

c)

Kay Hian & Co. Pte (Ltd) v John Phua Ooi Yang & Ors

d)

Re Vallertort Sanitary Steam Laundry Co Ltd [1903]

31.

Floating charges

a)

Re Yokshire Woolcombers' Association Ltd

b)

Re Benjamin Cope & Sons Ltd

c)

Evans v Rival Granite Quarries Ltd [1910]

d)

Gov Stock & Other Securities v Manila Rail Co

32.

Bensa Sdn Bhd v Malayan Banking Berhad

a)

Debenture

b)

Floating Charge

c)

Fixed vs Floating Charge

d)

Crystallization of floating charge

33.

Re Vallertort Sanitary Steam Laundry Co Ltd [1903]

a)

Priority of charges

b)

Negative pledges

c)

Registration of charges

d)

Debenture

34.

Rights attach to shares confer on the holders is rights as members

a)

Re Kong Thai Sawmills (Miri) Sdn Bhd

b)

Scottish Co-Operative Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer [1959]

c)

Pender v Lushington [1877]

d)

North-West Transportation Co. Ltd v Beatty [1887]

35.

Oppression

a)

Re Kong Thai Sawmills (Miri) Sdn Bhd

b)

Re Chi Liung & Sons Ltd [1968]

c)

Scottish Co-Operative Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer [1959]

d)

Re Overton Holdings Pty Ltd [1984]

36.

Situations where S.346(1) may be applicable : They had planned for their own interests or their selected ones whilst making loss.

a)

Re Overton Holdings Pty Ltd (1984)

b)

Re Bright Pine Mills Pty Ltd [1969]

c)

Barror v Parter [1914]

d)

Re Kong Thai Sawmills Sdn Bhd

37.

Directors cause the company to acquire loan that it does not need and with no financial interests at unrealistic terms.

a)

Re HR Harmer Ltd [1958]

b)

Re Bright Pine Mills Pty Ltd [1969]

c)

Re Overton Holdings Pty Ltd [1984]

d)

Re Kong Thai Sawmills Sdn Bhd

38.

The action is continuing as the date of suit

a)

Re Kong Thai Sawmills Sdn Bhd

b)

Re Chi Liung & Sons Ltd [1968]

c)

Re Overton Holdings Pty Ltd [1984]

d)

Re Bright Pine Mills Pty Ltd [1969]

39.

Management Power

a)

Barron v Porter [1914]

b)

Boardman v Phipps [1987]

c)

Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver

d)

John Shaw & Sons (Salford) Ltd v Shaw [1935]

40.

Deadlock

a)

Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver

b)

Totex-Adon Pty Ltd v Marco

c)

Barron v Porter [1914]

d)

Boardman v Phipps [1967]

41.

Fiduciary duties: Acting in good faith for the best interest of the company

a)

Winkworth v Edward Baron Development Co. Ltd

b)

Grove v Flavel

c)

Totex - Adon Pty Ltd v Marco

d)

Boardman v Phipps [1967]

42.

No conflict of interest between directors and the company

a)

Winkworth v Edward Baron Development Co. Ltd

b)

Boardman v Phipps [1967]

c)

Grove v Flavel

d)

Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver

43.

Directors use his positions as a director to gain personal profit

a)

Grove v Flavel

b)

Totex - Adon Pty Ltd v Marco

c)

Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver

d)

Cook v Deeks

44.

Winkworth v Edward Baron Development Co Ltd

a)

Fiduciary duties: No conflict of interest between directors and the company

b)

Fiduciary duties: Acting in good faith for the best interest of the company

c)

Management power

d)

Deadlock