WorksheetsMedJuris
Total questions: 116
Worksheet time: 58mins
Name
Class
Date
1.
Which of the following stipulations in a physician-patient contract would be considered void for being contrary to public order?
a)
A provision requiring the physician to use a specific, non-prescription brand of equipment during the consultation
b)
A provision requiring the patient to publicly announce they are infected with a contagious disease in exchange for free testing
c)
A provision stating that the physician is exempt from liability for medical negligence provided no fees were charged
2.
The essential requisites of a contractual relationship are consent, object or subject matter, and cause or consideration. What legal consequence results if the consideration in a physician-patient contract is demonstrably absent?
a)
The contract is void *ab initio* because all three requisites must be present for a contract to exist
b)
The law presumes the existence of consideration, allowing the contract to remain valid unless proven otherwise
c)
The contract transitions from a contractual relationship to a purely fiduciary relationship, mitigating liability for the physician
3.
The physician-patient relationship is characterized as consensual and fiduciary. Which specific characteristic primarily supports the requirement that both parties must have mutual trust, allowing the patient to disclose sensitive truths?
a)
Consensual nature, which relies on the freedom of the patient to choose their care provider
b)
Fiduciary nature, which necessitates a higher level of care and mutual confidence to ensure proper diagnosis and treatment
c)
Contractual nature, as codified by Article 1305 of the New Civil Code
4.
Dr. X is treating Patient A for an ACL tear. Dr. X shares the case details with Dr. Y in a casual professional conversation, and Dr. Y suggests immediate surgery. Dr. X performs the surgery based on Dr. Y's suggestion, leading to harm for Patient A. Is Dr. Y liable to Patient A?
a)
Yes, because Dr. Y provided definitive medical advice which constituted the object of a newly formed implied contract with Patient A
b)
Yes, under the doctrine of *respondeat superior* since Dr. X acted upon Dr. Y's specialized suggestion
c)
No, because Dr. A merely narrated the case to Dr. B, and this professional conversation did not establish the consent requisite for Dr. Y
5.
A physician wishes to withdraw from treating a patient due to repeated non-adherence to the treatment plan. Which of the following conditions is *necessary* for the physician to avoid liability for abandonment?
a)
The physician must first secure mutual agreement from the patient to terminate the relationship
b)
The patient must be given ample time and notice to secure the services of another physician
c)
The physician must wait until the patient achieves complete recovery from the condition being treated
6.
A physician performs medical services entirely out of liberality, recognizing the profession as a call of service for humanity, and collects no professional fee (PF). Subsequently, the patient sues for malpractice. Can the physician use the lack of PF payment as a defense against the negligence claim?
a)
Yes, because the lack of monetary consideration means the relationship was purely gratuitous and lacked the full legal weight of a contract
b)
No, because non-payment of the medical fee does not extinguish the contractual relationship nor liability for medical malpractice or negligence
c)
Yes, provided the gratuitous nature of the service was explicitly stipulated in a written agreement between the parties
7.
A patient brings a civil case against a physician alleging breach of contract based on a negative outcome of a surgical procedure. Assuming no specific success guarantee was stipulated, which standard must the patient prove the physician failed to meet?
a)
The standard of guaranteeing the treatment will benefit the patient and will not harm the patient
b)
The physician failed to use at least the same level of care that any other reasonably competent physician would use under the circumstances
c)
The physician committed an honest mistake that led directly to the negative outcome
8.
When does the physician-patient contractual relationship typically commence in a non-emergency situation involving an agreed consultation?
a)
Only when the physical examination or treatment begins, establishing the object and rendering of service
b)
When the physician and patient mutually consent (explicitly or implicitly) to the service, and the object and consideration are present
c)
Only after the patient has signed the formal intake forms and paid the consultation fee
9.
A physician-patient contract stipulates that, in the event of the physician's death, a specific associate physician, Dr. C, will automatically assume care for the patient. Assuming Dr. C agrees, what determines the validity of this stipulation?
a)
The stipulation is valid only if the original contract was written and expressly listed Dr. C as an alternative provider
b)
The stipulation is valid provided Patient B (the patient) consents to this arrangement with Dr. C upon Dr. A's death
c)
The stipulation is void because the physician's duty is fundamentally fiduciary, mandating that death automatically terminates the relationship due to the loss of specific trust
10.
The object or subject matter of a contract must be determinate, legal, and within the commerce of man. Which of the following legal concepts prevents a contract for the sale of a cadaver from being a valid object?
a)
It is forbidden by law, violating the requisite of legality
b)
It is outside the commerce of man, failing the requisite of commercial deliverability
c)
It is indeterminate, as a cadaver's legal ownership is difficult to ascertain
11.
A patient is brought unconscious to the emergency room by a family member. The physician immediately takes the patient's history (from the family member), performs an examination, and institutes necessary treatment. What is the classification and perfection status of this contract?
a)
Express contract, perfected by the physician's clear external manifestation of accepting the patient
b)
Implied contract, perfected by the acts of the contracting parties (physician and mother/family member)
c)
Quasi-contract, resulting from an emergency intervention without a meeting of the minds
12.
The law requires consent to a contract to be intelligent, free, and spontaneous. If a patient agrees to a procedure after being threatened by their relatives with the removal of financial support if they refuse, what is the effect on the contract?
a)
The contract is valid, as the patient voluntarily signed the consent form and the physician was unaware of the duress
b)
The consent is vitiated by intimidation or undue influence, making the resulting contract defective
c)
The consent is merely imperfect, allowing the patient to ratify the contract later if they choose
13.
A specialist physician is engaged by a patient for the sole purpose of examining an identified neurological condition and providing a diagnostic report to the primary care physician. Assuming no further agreement, when does the physician-patient relationship typically terminate?
a)
Upon the patient's subsequent full recovery from the neurological condition
b)
Upon the patient discharging the specialist, with or without cause
c)
Upon the specialist fulfilling the obligation stipulated in the contract by delivering the diagnostic report
14.
Which statement correctly describes the necessary form required for a physician-patient contract to be perfected and legally binding?
a)
It must be in written form to ensure the consent and stipulations are externally manifested
b)
It must be explicit (written or oral) to ensure a clear meeting of the minds occurred
c)
It does not need to be in written form, and may even be perfected by the mere rendering of service and acceptance
15.
Dr. Z is Patient P's primary care physician. Patient P terminates the contract, citing dissatisfaction with the clinic location. What duty, if any, remains with Dr. Z after the termination of the contractual relationship?
a)
Dr. Z has no remaining duties, as the patient discharged the physician without cause, extinguishing all obligations
b)
Dr. Z is duty-bound to provide sufficient and adequate records and information to Patient P's successor physician
c)
Dr. Z remains potentially liable for any liabilities or negligent acts incurred prior to the patient's discharge
16.
A physician is consulted by a patient seeking an abortion, which is illegal in the jurisdiction. If the physician agrees to perform the procedure for a high fee, what is the legal status of the resulting contractual relationship?
a)
Void, because the object (the medical service) is not legal
b)
Valid, provided the physician and patient agree on the specific fee (consideration)
c)
Voidable, as the consent may be vitiated due to the high-risk nature of the procedure
17.
The physician-patient relationship, when commenced, obliges the physician to comply with legal duties and obligations. However, the contractual relationship specifically does *not* include which of the following guarantees, unless explicitly stipulated?
a)
The promise that the physician will render proper medical service and use the required level of care
b)
The promise that the treatment will be successful and will ultimately benefit the patient
c)
The guarantee that the physician will not commit honest mistakes during the course of the treatment
18.
Which of the following activities performed by a physician is least likely to establish a comprehensive physician-patient relationship and most likely to establish a relationship limited in scope?
a)
Providing ongoing care as a corporate primary care physician for six months under an employment contract
b)
Consulting with an aunt at a family reunion, offering a diagnosis and prescribing a pain reliever for her symptoms
c)
Performing an examination specifically to determine a patient's eligibility for an insurance agreement
19.
Consent in a physician-patient contract must be intelligent. What does 'intelligent consent' legally require from the patient?
a)
The patient must have previously studied the nature of the condition and the proposed procedure in detail
b)
The patient must understand what they are consenting to, why they are giving consent, and the nature of the consent being given
c)
The consent must be in written form (Informed Consent) and signed by the patient in the presence of witnesses
20.
If a physician-patient contract includes a stipulation that is contrary to 'morals,' what is the legal effect on that stipulation?
a)
The stipulation is void, as the freedom to stipulate is limited by morals, law, good customs, public order, and public policy
b)
The stipulation is merely voidable, as morality is a subjective spectrum and must yield to the parties' freedom of contract
c)
The stipulation is valid, provided it does not directly violate any existing law or threat public safety
21.
Which scenario represents the commencement of an *express* physician-patient relationship?
a)
A patient is rushed unconscious into the ER and treated by the attending physician
b)
A patient verbally asks a physician to treat his cough, and the physician agrees and prescribes medicine
c)
A patient schedules an appointment by phone, agreeing to the time slot provided by the physician
22.
The determination that the physician's further services will no longer be beneficial to the patient, allowing the physician to terminate the contract, is subject to whose discretion?
a)
The mutual agreement of the patient and the physician, since the contract is consensual
b)
The sound discretion of the Physician after a complete and thorough evaluation
c)
The determination of a third-party ethics committee or medical board
23.
What key element of contract perfection is typically presumed to exist by law in a physician-patient contractual agreement, even if no monetary transaction has occurred?
a)
Consent, because seeking advice implies consent to the relationship
b)
Object, because medical services are the inherent subject matter
c)
Cause or Consideration, which can be non-monetary, such as gratuitous service or liberality
24.
A 3rd-year law student approaches a physician during a birthday party and asks a general question about the biological mechanism of a common cold, which the physician answers. Has a physician-patient relationship been established?
a)
Yes, because the object (medical knowledge) and implied consent were present in the exchange
b)
No, because casual conversation in social gatherings does not establish the relationship if no medical advice, prescription, examination, or treatment is rendered
c)
Yes, because the fiduciary duty of the physician extends to all individuals seeking medical information
25.
Which scenario best exemplifies a stipulation that is contrary to 'good customs' in the context of a physician-patient contract?
a)
A stipulation prohibiting the patient from disclosing their treatment plan to their spouse
b)
A stipulation requiring the patient to wear only green clothing during all appointments
c)
A stipulation forbidding the use of customary honorifics like 'po' and 'opo' in the Philippines during conversations
26.
If a physician dies, the physician-patient contract automatically terminates. Why is this termination considered automatic, especially given the contractual nature of the relationship?
a)
The contractual relationship is purely personal, and death extinguishes the object (medical service) that could be rendered
b)
The physician’s duty is fiduciary, involving trust and confidence, which ceases to exist upon the death of one party
c)
The law forbids the assignment of medical contractual duties to any other party upon the death of the original physician
27.
Dr. P and Patient Q agree that Dr. P will serve as Patient Q's physician for a period of six months during an employment contract. After six months, Patient Q suffers complications but did not schedule another appointment. Is Dr. P still obliged to render service?
a)
Yes, because the physician-patient relationship is perpetual unless affirmatively terminated by the patient
b)
No, because the expiration of the set period for services terminates the physician-patient relationship
c)
Yes, because liabilities incurred prior to the expiration of the period may still be enforced
28.
A physician is consulted by a patient seeking treatment for chronic back pain. The physician-patient contract is created. Which of the following legal concepts most accurately describes the 'object or subject matter' of this contract?
a)
The professional fee paid to the physician for the service rendered
b)
The patient's back pain (the condition requiring treatment)
c)
The medical service to be rendered for the back pain
29.
In which situation would a physician be performing services where the scope of the physician-patient relationship is explicitly limited and does not establish a long-term relationship?
a)
Treating a minor patient whose legal capacity requires parental consent
b)
Providing medical services under a contractual arrangement where the consideration is purely gratuitous
c)
Rendering medical service for the particular purpose of an autopsy examination
30.
If a patient unilaterally calls another physician to treat him for the same condition while still under the care of the original physician, how is the relationship with the original physician affected?
a)
The contract is only suspended until the patient formally discharges the original physician in writing
b)
The relationship continues, but the original physician's liability is automatically reduced due to shared responsibility
c)
The original physician-patient contractual relationship is impliedly terminated by the patient's action
31.
A physician offers treatment for a rare heart disease, explicitly guaranteeing a "100% cure," and basing the professional fee entirely on this success (a contingent fee). If the treatment fails, what is the most accurate legal consequence?
a)
The physician is not liable because cure is inherently not among the guarantees of a medical professional
b)
The physician is liable for contractual breach because cure was the express object and subject matter of the contract
c)
The contract is void *ab initio* because medical contracts cannot guarantee success, rendering the object illegal
32.
Dr. A's secretary, C, refers patients to Dr. B's secretary, D. D then gives C a portion of Dr. B's professional fee, with Dr. A completely unaware of the transaction. Which classification applies to this arrangement?
a)
It is an unethical dichotomous fee because medical services were solicited for a commission
b)
It is a valid finder's fee since neither physician had knowledge of the arrangement
c)
It is permissible because non-medical practitioners are not bound by the code of ethics and physicians are unaware
33.
In the hypothetical UK law scenario prohibiting physicians from dispensing birth control, the law was enacted after full parliamentary hearings where all concerned groups were heard. Which due process right was ultimately violated by the law itself?
a)
Procedural due process, because the final decision was not based entirely on the evidence presented in the hearings
b)
Substantive due process, because the intrinsic validity of the law violates the patient's right to privacy
c)
Equal Protection of the Law, because it created an arbitrary classification targeting private medical practitioners
34.
A patient sues a physician for negligence and seeks a search warrant for the physician's office. The warrant issued orders the police to "search and seize any object that relates to the medical negligence suit filed by Patient A." Is this search warrant valid?
a)
Yes, because the scope is clearly limited to the subject matter of the medical negligence suit
b)
No, because the objects sought to be seized are not described with particularity, making it a prohibited "Fishing Expedition"
c)
Yes, provided the judge personally determined that probable cause existed prior to issuance
35.
A police officer arrests a physician's secretary after watching CCTV footage (shown by the physician) that clearly depicts the secretary stealing medical fees the day before. The police did not have an arrest warrant. Was the warrantless arrest valid?
a)
Yes, under the "Hot Pursuit Doctrine" since the crime was just committed and the offender was identified using reliable evidence (CCTV)
b)
No, because the crime was not committed in the presence of the arresting officer, nor did the officer have the required personal knowledge for hot pursuit
c)
Yes, because the police officer had probable cause, based on the reliable CCTV evidence, to believe the secretary was the perpetrator
36.
Due to an invalid warrantless arrest, several items seized from the accused physician (personal effects and documents) are deemed inadmissible in court. What doctrine governs the inadmissibility of this evidence?
a)
Substantive Due Process, as the illegal seizure itself violated the intrinsic validity of the proceedings
b)
The Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment, as the State cannot benefit from illegally acquired evidence
c)
The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine, where evidence derived from an illegal act is tainted and inadmissible
37.
Dr. S is asked to treat a patient who is actively bleeding profusely in a remote, dangerous location. Treating the patient would require Dr. S to rappel down a slippery, unsecured slope, posing a significant risk to the physician's safety. If Dr. S refuses to administer first aid, will he be liable for abandonment?
a)
Yes, because the right to choose patients is not absolute and first aid must be rendered in emergencies
b)
No, because the physician may refuse treatment if such poses a risk to his or her safety
c)
Yes, unless Dr. S secured a written refusal from the patient or the patient's next of kin
38.
A physician, relying on the Doctrine of Superior Knowledge, decides that a rare, highly specialized procedure is required for the patient. The patient, however, refuses to give informed consent for this procedure. What is the immediate legal recourse for the physician?
a)
The physician must petition the court to override the patient's refusal, given the necessity of the treatment
b)
The physician must proceed with the procedure, provided the superior medical knowledge confirms it is life-saving
c)
The physician can withdraw from the relationship, as informed consent is necessary for the determined procedure
39.
Under which specific exception is a physician generally *required* by external mandate (e.g., government policy during a crisis) to disclose confidential patient information, even without patient consent?
a)
When necessary to serve the best interest of justice (e.g., court order)
b)
When the patient sues the physician on the matter at issue
c)
When common good or public health and safety requires it (e.g., during a pandemic)
40.
What is the specific degree of diligence required of a physician in the exercise of their knowledge and skill in treating a patient?
a)
Extraordinary diligence, as life and limb are involved
b)
Ordinary care and diligence, expected of a reasonably prudent man under the same circumstances
c)
Best judgment, regardless of whether the resulting error is considered negligence
41.
Dr. E commits an error in judgment during a complicated surgical procedure, leading to a negative outcome. Dr. E possesses the average knowledge and skills expected. When is Dr. E *not* considered negligent based solely on this error?
a)
If the patient signed a waiver releasing the physician from all liability prior to the procedure
b)
As long as the decision was based on the honest exercise of best judgment using average skills and knowledge
c)
Only if a specialist physician confirms that the error was unavoidable given the circumstances
42.
Spousal consent is required for a medical procedure performed on the patient spouse. Which of the following conditions is *not* sufficient alone to trigger the requirement for spousal consent?
a)
When the procedure will destroy the reproductive function of the spouse
b)
When the procedure is risky to the life of the spouse
c)
When the procedure is expensive and requires a significant financial consideration
43.
A mother refuses Hepatitis B vaccination for her 4-year-old child, George, citing religious beliefs. Based on current jurisprudence, can the health officer insist on administering the vaccine?
a)
No, the patient (via the parent/guardian) has the absolute right to refuse necessary treatment based on religious freedom
b)
Yes, because the refusal of a parent can be overridden if the treatment is mandated by law, such as RA 10152
c)
No, unless the court first issues an order granting consent for the child's welfare
44.
A patient notices a new, unusual symptom one week after initiating a treatment plan prescribed by the physician. The patient chooses to delay informing the physician until the next scheduled check-up in a month. Which duty of the patient has been breached?
a)
The duty to provide an honest medical history of his illness, which must be done at the commencement of the relationship
b)
The duty to exercise prudence expected of an ordinary patient under the same circumstances
c)
The duty to inform the physician about occurrences that happened in the course of treatment so the physician may recalibrate diagnosis
45.
A physician provides a patient with comprehensive information regarding the risks of refusing a life-saving blood transfusion (due to religious reasons), documents the refusal via an AMA form, and offers alternative treatments. If the patient subsequently dies, can the physician be held liable for patient abandonment?
a)
Yes, because the fiduciary duty to preserve life overrides the patient's right to refuse, making the termination premature
b)
No, because patient abandonment only occurs when the physician unilaterally severs the relationship *without notice* while the patient needs continuous care
c)
No, because documenting the refusal and communicating the options means the refusal, not the physician's action, led to the severance of the relationship
46.
A minor requires an urgent, life-saving procedure, but the parents refuse consent based on religious beliefs. The physician seeks legal assistance. What must the physician, the DSWD, or the court ultimately base their intervention on to override parental authority?
a)
The explicit legal mandate for mandatory treatment stipulated in existing public health laws
b)
The best interest of the child, overriding the parents' surrogate decision-making capacity
c)
The economic capacity of the parents to afford alternative, non-refused treatments
47.
The Philippine Congress is considering a law prohibiting non-Filipino physicians from practicing medicine, even with reciprocity, arguing that 80% of negligence cases stem from miscommunication. A challenge to this law, based on the Equal Protection Clause, would likely fail if the court finds which of the following?
a)
That the classification is arbitrary, but the law aims to address a compelling state interest
b)
That the classification between foreign and Filipino physicians is based on a substantial distinction and is germane to the law's purpose
c)
That the law applies to non-Filipinos from countries without reciprocity only
48.
Which statement accurately reflects the interaction between a physician's right to compensation and the nobility of the medical profession?
a)
The contractual relationship allows the physician to enforce the right to compensation, but the Code of Ethics dictates that financial gain should be a subordinate consideration
b)
The Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment dictates that a physician cannot waive the professional fee, regardless of the patient's financial status
c)
The right to compensation requires the fee to be strictly monetary, excluding non-monetary consideration like love or affection
49.
What is the primary legal justification for granting physicians the "Right of Exemption from Execution of Instruments and the Library"?
a)
To ensure the physician's professional instruments are not considered part of marital or conjugal property
b)
To uphold the Doctrine of Superior Knowledge by protecting essential practice tools
c)
To ensure the physician can still continue the practice of his profession even if he loses everything in collection suits
50.
A physician charges a fee that is demonstrably excessive and disproportionate to the service rendered, although the service was highly effective. Which doctrine provides the balancing factor to ensure fairness in the fixing of medical fees, protecting the patient from overcharging?
a)
The Doctrine of Superior Knowledge
b)
The Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment
c)
The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine
51.
Dr. M, a cardiologist, is treating Patient T. Patient T continuously disregards Dr. M's advice regarding diet and medication. Dr. M determines that further services will no longer be beneficial to Patient T. What inherent right allows Dr. M to legally terminate the relationship in this situation?
a)
The Right to Limit Practice of Profession
b)
The Right to Determine the Appropriate Management Procedure
c)
The Right to Refuse Treatment / Choose Patients
52.
During police interrogation for Object Rape, Dr. Chito, having been read his Miranda rights, waits three hours for his chosen lawyer, Atty. Angel, who fails to arrive. Dr. Chito accepts assistance from an assigned police lawyer, Atty. Tisha, and answers questions. What legal mechanism allowed the court to later find that Dr. Chito's right to counsel was *not* violated?
a)
The Doctrine of Superior Knowledge, presuming Dr. Chito understood the legal context
b)
The implied waiver of his rights due to his failure to persistently object or refuse to answer
c)
The principle that the police always have the right to assign counsel if the chosen one is absent
53.
What specific element does Substantive Due Process examine when assessing the constitutionality of a law?
a)
The procedure followed by the government agency or legislature in implementing the law
b)
The opportunity given to all concerned parties to be heard and present evidence
c)
The intrinsic validity of the law itself, determining if it infringes upon a fundamental right
54.
In a Straight Fee (Pakyaw System) arrangement, which of the following financial burdens is the physician *not* responsible for, provided the patient tendered the agreed amount?
a)
Payment of the hospital bill and use of the operating room
b)
The professional fees of the medical team (e.g., anesthesiologist, OB)
c)
None, as the physician is responsible for all incidental expenses, bills, and fees
55.
The physician-patient relationship is fundamentally consensual and fiduciary. Which of these characteristics primarily supports the physician's right to choose their patients and the patient's corresponding right to choose their physician?
a)
The fiduciary nature, which implies trust can only be established through mutual agreement
b)
The inherent contractual relationship, which necessitates mutual consent between the parties
c)
The Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment, balancing the obligations of both parties
56.
The physician-patient relationship is fiduciary in nature. Which specific obligation imposed upon the physician most directly stems from this requirement of mutual trust and confidence?
a)
The duty to observe utmost good faith in discussing diagnosis and prognosis
b)
The obligation to use ordinary care and diligence in providing services
c)
The right to retain medical records as the designated record keeper
57.
Under RA 6615, what is the mandatory obligation of all government and private hospitals/clinics when presented with a patient in an emergency case who is in danger of dying or seriously injured?
a)
To render immediate emergency medical assistance and provide facilities and medicine within its capabilities
b)
To admit the patient immediately regardless of the patient's capacity to pay or provide a deposit
c)
To provide treatment only upon securing informed consent from the patient or the patient's next of kin
58.
A Retainer Fee arrangement is utilized between a company and a physician. How is the value of this fee measured?
a)
By the quantity or quality of services rendered to the company's employees
b)
By space and time, regardless of the quantity or quality of services actually rendered
c)
By the average of the usual fees charged for similar services in the surrounding area
59.
The death of a physician automatically terminates the physician-patient contract. The primary legal rationale for this automatic termination, even if the deceased physician stipulated a replacement, rests on what characteristic of the relationship?
a)
The professional fee (consideration) being extinguished upon the death of the party who earned it
b)
The contractual obligation ending because the physician's duties are considered purely personal and non-delegable
c)
The fiduciary nature of the physician’s duty, involving specific trust and confidence that ceases to exist upon the death of one party
60.
Which of the following medical services establishes a relationship where the scope is explicitly limited and does not establish a long-term physician-patient relationship?
a)
Treating a patient under a purely gratuitous contract (no professional fee)
b)
Providing consultation and diagnosis at a social gathering upon request
c)
Performing an autopsy examination for legal purposes
61.
A physician offers treatment for a rare heart disease, explicitly guaranteeing a "100% cure," and basing the professional fee entirely on this success (a contingent fee). If the treatment fails, what is the most accurate legal consequence?
a)
The physician is not liable because cure is inherently not among the guarantees of a medical professional
b)
The physician is liable for contractual breach because cure was the express object and subject matter of the contract
c)
The contract is void *ab initio* because medical contracts cannot guarantee success, rendering the object illegal
62.
In the Li vs. Spouses Soliman case, the physician was held liable despite conforming to standard care in chemotherapy administration. What was the most direct basis for the physician's liability as affirmed by the Court of Appeals?
a)
The physician failed to observe the Professional Practice Standard by not giving the patient a short medical education
b)
The physician's assurance of a 95% cure rate, which the court later found to be unlikely and fraudulent
c)
The inadequate disclosure of material risks that would have altered the parents' decision to consent to the treatment
63.
Which information is NOT strictly required for disclosure under the Prudent Patient Standard (Patient-Centered Approach)?
a)
The prognosis with or without the proposed treatment
b)
Every possible low-probability risk inherent in the treatment
c)
Alternative treatments and the risks associated with them
64.
Which statement accurately describes the minimum legal capacity required for an individual to personally give valid informed consent?
a)
The person must be of legal age, unless they are a minor in need of emergency treatment
b)
The person must be of legal age and of sound mind
c)
The person must demonstrate prior medical knowledge sufficient to weigh the risks
65.
In which situation does the Doctrine of Necessity most clearly uphold a physician's decision to proceed with treatment without consent?
a)
The patient is conscious and competent but refuses life-saving treatment due to religious beliefs
b)
The patient is unconscious or temporarily incapacitated and in need of emergency treatment to save or preserve life
c)
The patient is unconscious, there is no emergency, but no next of kin is available to provide surrogate consent
66.
A physician who fails to procure proper informed consent opens himself/herself to which specific categories of liabilities?
a)
Civil, Criminal and Medical liabilities
b)
Civil, Criminal and Administrative liabilities
c)
Criminal and Social liabilities only
67.
Parents of a minor, who is conscious and competent, refuse a life-saving procedure based on religious beliefs. How should the physician proceed legally, recognizing the limits of autonomy in this case?
a)
The physician has no right to interfere, respecting the patient's right to autonomy through parental authority
b)
The physician must proceed immediately with the procedure under the Doctrine of Necessity, overriding parental refusal
c)
The physician must ensure the parental decision is for the best interest of the child, potentially seeking court intervention
68.
The standards of disclosure (Professional Practice and Prudent Patient) are evaluated case-to-case. How does the court apply the standard's perspective, given that it is not subjective to the physician or the patient?
a)
It remains purely subjective, focusing on what the individual physician deemed sufficient based on their training
b)
It remains objective, with due regard for the patient's informational needs and suitable leeway for the physician's situation
c)
It is subjective to the patient, focusing only on what the patient claimed they needed to know
69.
Under the Professional Practice Standard for disclosure, who primarily carries the burden of determining sufficient information?
a)
The patient, who must demonstrate prior knowledge of the procedure and risks
b)
The physician, whose discretion is guided by judicially approved standards of medical opinion
c)
The Court, which retrospectively determines the materiality of undisclosed risks
70.
Consent given by a patient who agrees to an operation only after the physician threatens to disclose their sensitive personal information unrelated to the procedure is vitiated by which vice?
a)
Error/Mistake, as the patient misunderstood the consequences of refusal
b)
Duress, as the consent was forced through coercion or fear
c)
Fraud, due to deliberate deception regarding the procedural necessity
71.
Which element establishes the necessary causal link for malpractice based on inadequate informed consent?
a)
The physician had a duty to disclose material risks
b)
The patient consented to treatment they otherwise would not have consented to, as a direct and proximate result of the failure to disclose
c)
The physician failed to fully explain the goals expectedly to be achieved by the therapy
72.
Dr. X, a highly experienced dermatologist, is called to testify on the applicable standard of care in a complex neurosurgery case. When will Dr. X's testimony be admissible as an expert opinion?
a)
If Dr. X is the best surgeon in the country and possesses superior knowledge
b)
If the fact to be proven requires expert knowledge AND Dr. X has the necessary knowledge and training to deduce the correct inference
c)
If the court determines that Dr. X’s testimony is not based on hearsay
73.
In which legal setting does the physician-patient privilege communication, as defined under A.M. 19-08-15-SC, apply?
a)
Criminal cases only, when the patient is deceased
b)
Administrative bodies (e.g. PRC) investigating physician misconduct
c)
Civil cases, concerning confidential communication for diagnosis or treatment
74.
A medical practitioner is ethically obligated to guard confidential information even after the patient's death. This ethical duty is specifically lifted in the interest of which of the following?
a)
The physician's defense against a malpractice suit
b)
Justice public health and public policy
c)
Administrative efficiency in processing claims
75.
Dr. Y, a physician, testifies as an ordinary witness. Which statement is admissible under the rule requiring personal knowledge?
a)
The patient died because I believe the driver was traveling at excessive speed
b)
The vehicle involved was a silver Vios; which I saw bump the pedestrian
c)
I know the driver was intoxicated because someone in the crowd shouted that he smelled alcohol
76.
Which statement correctly characterizes a physician serving as *Amicus Curiae* (Friend of the Court)?
a)
The physician is subject to direct and cross-examination by opposing counsel
b)
The physician is technically not a witness providing impartial advice directly to the Court
c)
The physician must be unaffiliated with any party and possess superior expertise in the specific medical field
77.
Under the Amended Rules on Evidence, what constitutes "Hearsay"?
a)
A statement made by a person in court that is not based on their personal knowledge
b)
Any opinion offered by a witness not qualified as an expert
c)
A statement oral, written or non-verbal conduct made out of court offered to prove the truth of the facts asserted therein
78.
A physician is present when a fatally wounded patient states, "Cardo shot me," moments before dying. The statement is offered in the criminal trial against Cardo. Why is this statement admissible, despite the physician lacking personal knowledge of the shooting?
a)
It falls under the exception that statements made to medical professionals are inherently reliable
b)
It qualifies as a Dying Declaration meeting all requisites for an exception to the Hearsay Rule
c)
It is admissible because the criminal case itself waives the physician-patient privilege
79.
Dr. T is ordered by the court to appear and testify in a negligence hearing, and to bring all patient charts related to the matter. What specific process requires Dr. T to bring the charts?
a)
Subpoena
b)
Subpoena Duces Tecum
c)
Contempt of Court
80.
A patient is unconscious following a non-life-threatening accident, and no next of kin is present. The physician proceeds with non-emergency surgery. What standard will the court use to assess the physician's action?
a)
Doctrine of Necessity provided the action was for the patient's best interest
b)
Standards based on "acceptable" norms in medical societies to determine if the intervention was immediately necessary
c)
The *in flagrante delicto* rule assessing if the physician acted immediately upon discovering the need
81.
According to the ruling on disclosure standards (Li vs. Soliman), which specific information is NOT legally necessary for a physician to meet the requirement for reasonable explanation to the patient?
a)
The therapy alternatives open to the patient
b)
Statistical data of specific harms and complications
c)
The goals expectedly to be achieved by the treatment
82.
A patient signs the informed consent form without reading it. What is the legal implication regarding the validity of the consent in a subsequent malpractice suit?
a)
The signature is sufficient proof of consent placing the burden on the patient to prove lack of understanding
b)
The signature alone is insufficient to prove informed consent was properly obtained if the patient did not truly understand the procedure and risks
c)
The consent is vitiated by Error/Mistake making the contract voidable *ab initio*
83.
A statement made outside of court is usually inadmissible hearsay. Under what condition is an out-of-court statement *no longer* hearsay?
a)
If the statement is based on the declarant's personal knowledge
b)
If the declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement
c)
If the out-of-court statement is inconsistent with the declarant's testimony and was given under oath
84.
Physician-patient privilege communication extends protection to which group, provided the requirements are met?
a)
Hospital administrators and record custodians involved in billing
b)
Persons including family members who participated in the diagnosis or treatment under the direction of the physician
c)
Any witness who happened to overhear the confidential communication
85.
To successfully prove malpractice based on inadequate informed consent the plaintiff must ultimately demonstrate which requisite element?
a)
The physician committed an honest error in judgment during the procedure
b)
The patient suffered injury by the proposed treatment
c)
The physician failed to secure written consent from the patient's legal guardian
86.
A physician is called to the witness stand. Which pair of reasons represents the primary grounds for disqualification from testifying?
a)
Interest in the outcome of the case and lack of professional license
b)
Lack of personal knowledge and privileged communication
c)
Religious or political belief and lack of specialist certification
87.
Dr. C a qualified doctor testifies in court. What is the fundamental difference between Dr. C serving as an Ordinary Witness versus an Expert Witness?
a)
Ordinary witnesses testify only in civil cases while expert witnesses testify only in criminal cases
b)
Ordinary witnesses testify based on personal knowledge/perception while Expert Witnesses provide inferences and opinions based on specialized knowledge
c)
Expert witnesses must have specific training while ordinary witnesses require only legal capacity
88.
Which of the following scenarios concerning a physician's liability best exemplifies the application of both Breach of Contract and Quasi-Delict arising from a single transaction?
a)
A surgeon performs a procedure negligently, failing to meet the professional standard of care, leading to injury, despite no prior explicit service agreement.
b)
A physician fails to use imported pain-relieving machines promised to the patient due to cash flow problems, while simultaneously causing an injury during treatment through lack of necessary precaution.
c)
A physician issues a false medical certificate, thereby violating a specific penal provision and subsequently facing administrative reprimand for a criminal act involving moral turpitude.
89.
Dr. L is facing administrative charges. The court requires proof that is adequate for a reasonable mind to support a conclusion regarding Dr. L's misconduct. Which standard of evidence is being applied, and how does it relate to the other standards?
a)
Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt
b)
Substantial Evidence
c)
Preponderance of Evidence
90.
A patient files a civil suit against a physician for fault or negligence under Article 2176 of the New Civil Code. If the plaintiff seeks indemnification for pecuniary losses that are proven to have been suffered, such as hospital bills and loss of earning capacity, which type of damages is primarily being claimed?
a)
Moral Damages
b)
Exemplary or Corrective Damages
c)
Actual or Compensatory Damages
91.
A physician is found liable for a negligent act that caused injury to a patient. The patient has already received damages from a civil suit for negligence. If the same negligent act also resulted in a criminal case for reckless imprudence, what limitation applies to the criminal judgment regarding civil redress?
a)
The criminal court may impose both imprisonment and a fine, but cannot award additional damages, as the plaintiff cannot recover damages twice for the same act or omission.
b)
The criminal court must suspend the proceedings until the civil judgment is fully executed, ensuring the physician is not penalized twice for the same economic loss.
c)
The criminal court must apply the doctrine of double jeopardy, barring any further criminal punishment since the civil case was based on the same factual predicate.
92.
Which set of elements correctly identifies the components necessary to establish a felony committed by *dolo* (deliberate intent) under the Revised Penal Code?
a)
Freedom, Intelligence, and Lack of Skill
b)
Freedom, Intelligence, and Intent
c)
Freedom, Prudence, and Lack of Foresight
93.
The Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) issues a decision against a physician in an administrative case. What is the nature of the PRC's decision, and what is its effect upon the lapse of the appeal period?
a)
The PRC's decision is merely advisory, requiring final ratification by a true judicial court to become enforceable.
b)
The PRC's decision, being issued by a quasi-judicial body, has the force and effect of a court judgment and becomes final upon the lapse of the period to appeal.
c)
The PRC’s decision serves as a mandatory recommendation to the Board of Medicine, which holds the sole power to impose the final administrative penalty.
94.
A physician's Certificate of Registration was revoked due to professional misconduct. Under what circumstances and after what duration may the physician petition the Board of Medicine for reinstatement?
a)
After 5 years, provided the physician secures new professional references and pays all outstanding fines.
b)
After 2 years, provided the physician acted in an exemplary manner in the community and committed no illegal, immoral, or dishonorable acts.
c)
After 1 year, provided the physician re-takes and passes the relevant professional licensure examination.
95.
Which of the following grounds for administrative liability falls under the classification of "Criminal Acts of the Physician" under Section 24 of the Medical Act?
a)
Gross negligence resulting in injury or death of a patient.
b)
Addiction to alcoholic beverages, drugs, and gambling.
c)
Conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude.
96.
A physician is sued for negligence. The patient is found to have suffered pecuniary loss, but the exact amount cannot be calculated or determined with certainty by the court. Which type of damage is the court most likely to award, and how is it characterized in relation to other types?
a)
Nominal Damages, characterized as a sum awarded in recognition of a technical injury, not actual loss.
b)
Liquidated Damages, characterized as the sum agreed upon by the parties beforehand in the contract.
c)
Temperate or Moderate Damages, characterized as being more than nominal but less than compensatory damages.
97.
Which principle distinguishes crimes that are *mala prohibita* from those that are *mala in se* regarding the requirement of intent?
a)
*Mala in se* crimes punish acts that are inherently wrong and require proof of criminal intent (dolo), whereas *mala prohibita* crimes are illegal only because prohibited by law and do not require criminal intent.
b)
*Mala prohibita* crimes require proof of lack of foresight or skill (culpa), while *mala in se* crimes require only that the act or omission occurred (strict liability).
c)
Both types of crimes require proof of freedom and intelligence, but *mala in se* applies to violations of the Revised Penal Code, and *mala prohibita* applies only to Special Penal Laws.
98.
In a civil case for tort (quasi-delict) against a physician, the necessary quantum of evidence requires the evidence adduced by one side to be superior in weight, credit, and value to that of the other. This standard is synonymous with the greater weight of credible evidence. What is this standard called?
a)
Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt
b)
Preponderance of Evidence
c)
Substantial Evidence
99.
A plaintiff seeks to recover damages for "wounded feelings," "serious anxiety," and "social humiliation" resulting from a defendant physician's wrongful act. Although these effects are incapable of pecuniary computation, they are the proximate result of the wrong. Which specific type of damage is being claimed?
a)
Liquidated Damages
b)
Nominal Damages
c)
Moral Damages
100.
Which of the following acts is NOT explicitly listed in the source material as a potential source of criminal liability for a physician?
a)
Simulation of Births, Substitution and Concealment or Abandonment of a Legitimate Child (Art. 347, RPC).
b)
Violation of the Generics Act of 1988 (RA 6675).
c)
Knowingly performing surgery without obtaining informed consent from the patient or next of kin.
101.
A physician files an appeal against the Board of Medicine's decision imposing a reprimand. If the physician misses the reglementary period to appeal to the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC), what is the direct consequence, according to the sources?
a)
The Board of Medicine must set aside the reprimand and conduct a mandatory re-hearing.
b)
The decision of the Board becomes final and executory.
c)
The physician automatically loses the right to apply for reinstatement in the future.
102.
In the context of the physician-patient relationship, how do the requirements for proving a Breach of Contract case differ fundamentally from proving a case of Medical Negligence (Tort)?
a)
Breach of contract cases require proof of criminal intent, whereas medical negligence cases only require proof of lack of skill.
b)
Breach of contract cases do not require expert testimony to establish the standard of care, unlike medical negligence cases.
c)
Medical negligence cases require proof of fraud, while breach of contract only requires proof of actual damage.
103.
Which description accurately defines "Ignorance" in the context of administrative liability grounds, and how does it relate to "Incompetence"?
a)
Ignorance signifies an entire want of care which raises the presumption of conscious indifference, while incompetence is merely lack of adequate ability.
b)
Ignorance is the want or absence of knowledge, whereas incompetence is the lack of adequate ability or fitness to discharge the required duty.
c)
Ignorance refers to private acts not directly related to practice, while incompetence refers to public acts contrary to professional ethics.
104.
Dr. C is accused of issuing any statement or spreading any news or rumor which is derogatory to the character and reputation of another physician without justifiable motive. Under the Medical Act, this act is classified as a ground for administrative liability under which general category?
a)
Criminal Acts of the Physician
b)
Personal Acts of the Physician
c)
Unprofessional Conduct of the Physician
105.
Which doctrine or set of provisions acts as "catch-all provisions" in the Civil Code, potentially covering any breach of right or legal duty not contemplated by more specific provisions, thereby serving as a source of civil liability for physicians?
a)
Articles 19, 20, 21 of the New Civil Code (Abuse of Rights Doctrine).
b)
Article 2177 of the New Civil Code (Double Recovery Principle).
c)
Section 24 of the Medical Act (Grounds for Reprimand).
106.
Administrative proceedings against physicians are characterized as quasi-judicial in nature. Which defining characteristic best highlights the implications of this nature regarding procedural rules?
a)
They are strictly bound by the technical rules of procedure laid down by the rules of court, requiring adherence to all formalities.
b)
They do not apply the rule of *res judicata*, allowing perpetual re-filing of the same complaint.
c)
Most technicalities found in court proceedings do not apply strictly, meaning they are not bound by the technical rules of procedures lay down by the rules of court.
107.
Dr. F intentionally prescribed a controlled drug to a patient for personal gain. This act resulted in criminal liability. Which type of felony describes this situation, and what is its required element of intent?
a)
Felony by *Culpa*, requiring freedom, intelligence, and lack of foresight.
b)
Felony by *Dolo*, requiring freedom, intelligence, and intent.
c)
Felony by *Malum Prohibitum*, requiring the violation of the specific provision of the penal law.
108.
Which statement accurately differentiates "Damage" from "Injury" in the context of civil liability for a physician?
a)
Damage is the illegal invasion of a legal right, while injury is the loss, hurt, or harm resulting from the invasion.
b)
Injury is the illegal invasion of a legal right, while damage is the loss, hurt, or harm that results from the injury.
c)
Injury refers only to physical harm, whereas damage refers to pecuniary compensation for any form of loss.
109.
A physician is found civilly liable. The court awards a sum of money imposed by way of example or correction for the public good, *in addition* to compensatory damages, due to the wanton, reckless, or malicious nature of the wrong committed. What type of damages is this?
a)
Exemplary or Corrective Damages
b)
Nominal Damages
c)
Temperate Damages
110.
Which situation results in *damnum absque injuria*, meaning there is harm but no corresponding civil liability?
a)
A loss resulting from a physician's act or omission coupled with fault or negligence, but where no pre-existing contract exists.
b)
A loss or harm that was sustained but was *not* the result of a violation of a legal duty.
c)
A breach of contract where the object of the contract was not delivered, causing loss to the patient.
111.
Dr. G is sued for Gross Negligence, defined as signifying "entire want of care which raises the presumption of conscious indifference to possible consequences." In which category of administrative liability grounds does this definition primarily fall?
a)
Criminal Acts of the Physician
b)
Personal Acts of the Physician
c)
Unprofessional Conduct of the Physician
112.
A physician commits an act punishable under the Revised Penal Code. This single act gives rise to criminal, civil, and administrative liabilities. Regarding the procedural aspect, why may these three distinct cases proceed without the defense of double jeopardy being available?
a)
Double jeopardy only applies to cases seeking monetary damages, not those involving license revocation.
b)
The proceedings are of different natures, and double jeopardy only applies to criminal law.
c)
Criminal, civil, and administrative liabilities cannot stem from the same factual matrix in modern jurisprudence.
113.
A patient contracts with a cosmetic surgeon for liposuction. The surgeon fails to complete the procedure as agreed. Which type of damages would be easiest to prove if the patient and physician had previously stipulated a specific sum to be paid upon failure to perform the contracted service?
a)
Moral Damages
b)
Liquidated Damages
c)
Actual or Compensatory Damages
114.
If a physician is found liable for a felony committed by *culpa*, such as reckless imprudence, which combination of elements must have been present during the commission of the act or omission?
a)
Freedom, intelligence, and intent.
b)
Freedom, intelligence, and lack of foresight or lack of skill.
c)
Malice, intelligence, and fraud.
115.
The quantum of evidence required in an administrative case (Substantial Evidence) and a civil case (Preponderance of Evidence) are distinguishable. Which description best characterizes the acknowledged difference between these two standards in judicial hierarchy, according to the sources?
a)
Substantial evidence requires a reasonable mind to accept the evidence as adequate
b)
Preponderance of Evidence is the next highest level, but there is no clear quantitative or qualitative guide distinguishing the two.
c)
Preponderance of Evidence requires evidence that is close to absolute certainty
d)
Substantial Evidence requires only a scintilla of proof to avoid acquittal.
116.
A physician knowingly issues a document containing false information to facilitate a fraudulent insurance claim. This act exposes the physician to criminal liability. Which specific Revised Penal Code provision, mentioned in the sources, is applicable to this act?
a)
Article 365, RPC (Criminal Negligence and Imprudence)
b)
Article 174, RPC (Issuance of a False Medical Certificate)
c)
Article 347, RPC (Simulation of Births)
100 %
