Activity 1 (2023) LM 213

Activity 1 (2023) LM 213

University

9 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Risk Management

Risk Management

University - Professional Development

10 Qs

Certificate of Completion & Compliance by PSP

Certificate of Completion & Compliance by PSP

University

12 Qs

Data Privacy Officer Orientation

Data Privacy Officer Orientation

KG - Professional Development

10 Qs

IPO

IPO

University

10 Qs

Human Resource Planning

Human Resource Planning

University

10 Qs

L2 Plumbing Common Plumbing Processes Knowledge Test

L2 Plumbing Common Plumbing Processes Knowledge Test

University - Professional Development

14 Qs

Identifying Populations and Samples

Identifying Populations and Samples

University

6 Qs

RDL 1 Review of the Literature

RDL 1 Review of the Literature

11th Grade - University

10 Qs

Activity 1 (2023) LM 213

Activity 1 (2023) LM 213

Assessment

Quiz

Professional Development

University

Hard

Created by

Marvin Cabantac

Used 2+ times

FREE Resource

9 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Based on the Tanada vs. Tuvera (April 24, 1985), what is the purpose of publishing laws in the Official Gazette?

To inform the public of the contents of the laws

To make the laws binding on the people

To ensure due process and fairness

All of the choices

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the Tanada vs. Tuvera (April 24, 1985), which law requires the publication of important legislative acts and resolutions in the Official Gazette?

Constitution of the Philippines

Civil Code of the Philippines

Commonwealth Act No. 638

None of the choices

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main argument of the respondents against the petitioners' request for a writ of mandamus?

Petitioners have no legal standing to bring the petition

Publication in the Official Gazette is not necessary for the effectivity of laws

The presidential issuance in question have been implemented and enforced

None of the choices

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of the following best describes the position of the petitioners in the case?

They argue that publication in the Official Gazette is not necessary for the effectivity of laws

They claim that they have been personally and directly affected by the non-publication of presidential issuances

They assert that they are acting on behalf of the people's right to be informed on public concern

None of the above

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the significance of the Supreme Court's decision regarding the publication of presidential issuances?

It declares that the presidential issuances listed in the petition are invalid and have no binding force and effect

It establishes the requirement of publication in the Official Gazette for the effectivity of laws

It recognizes the right of the people to be informed on matters of public concern

All of the choices

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main argument of the Court in recognizing the legal personality of the petitioners in the case?

The petitioners have a legal or special interest in the result of the case

The question at hand involves a public right and the people are regarded as the real party in interest

The law exclusively grants the right for a writ of mandamus to government officers

None the choices

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the Tanada vs. Tuvera (April 24, 1985), what is the effect of the Court's declaration regarding the publication of presidential issuances?

All presidential issuances that have not been published in the Official Gazette are deemed invalid

The government is required to publish all unpublished presidential issuances of a public nature or general applicability

The Court's decision has no retroactive effect on presidential issuances that were enforced or implemented prior to their publication

None of the choices

8.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The ponente of the Tanada vs. Tuvera (April 24, 1985) is:

Escolin

Tuvera

Paras

Teehankee

9.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 2 pts

One of the petitioners in the case of Tanada vs. Tuvera (April 24, 1985) is MABINI, it stands for: