Cable Analyst Moffett Sees $35 Limit for Cord Cutters

Cable Analyst Moffett Sees $35 Limit for Cord Cutters

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Architecture, Social Studies, Performing Arts

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the rapid changes in the cable TV industry, highlighting the emergence of services like YouTube TV and Hulu TV as full-service cable replacements. It examines the economics of cord cutting, noting a 1.7% shrinkage in the pay TV universe. The debate over whether content or distribution is king is explored, with a focus on the competitive nature of distribution. The video also covers market dynamics, including potential mergers and acquisitions, and the challenges faced by companies like Sprint and T-Mobile in achieving successful deals.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the significance of the $35 price point in the context of new streaming services?

It is the average cost of cable TV.

It is the monthly fee for internet services.

It is the price point that determines the competitiveness of streaming services.

It is the cost of premium channels.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the current rate of cord-cutting in the pay TV universe?

0.5%

3.0%

1.7%

2.5%

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the debate between content and distribution, which is considered less competitive but more profitable?

Content

Distribution

Advertising

Customer Service

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a 'skinny bundle' in the context of cable and streaming services?

A bundle that includes internet and phone services.

A package with a wide variety of channels.

A premium package with exclusive content.

A package with fewer channels and lower cost.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is the merger between Sprint and T-Mobile considered challenging?

Due to regulatory issues.

Due to technological incompatibility.

Because of the high valuation of Sprint compared to T-Mobile.

Because of a lack of consumer interest.