The Case for a Single Executive in Federalist 70

The video discusses Federalist 70 by Alexander Hamilton, which argues for a single executive in the U.S. government. Hamilton emphasizes the need for energy, unity, and responsibility in the executive branch, contrasting it with the slower, deliberative legislative branch. He argues that a single executive can act decisively and be held accountable, unlike a council of executives, which could lead to division and inefficiency.

What was the main concern of the Anti-Federalists regarding a single executive?

• It would be too slow in decision-making.

• It would lack energy.

• It would be too expensive.

• It would lead to a monarchy.

According to Hamilton, what is the primary quality that defines a good executive?

• Compassion

• Energy

• Intelligence

• Diplomacy

What is one of the benefits of having a single executive, according to Hamilton?

• Increased secrecy

• More debate

• Unity

• Less responsibility

What historical issue does Hamilton highlight with multiple executives?

• Increased efficiency

• Bitter division

• Better representation

• More creativity

What does Hamilton argue is diminished with an increase in the number of executives?

• Public trust

• Legislative power

• Energy of the office

• Judicial independence

How does Hamilton describe the legislative branch compared to the executive?

• More energetic

• More decisive

• Deliberate and slow

• Less responsible

What does Hamilton suggest is a risk of having multiple executives during emergencies?

• Increased public support

• Faster decision-making

• Unified action

• Impeded government measures

What is a key argument Hamilton makes for a single executive in terms of responsibility?

• It increases secrecy.

• It ensures clear accountability.

• It destroys responsibility.

• It conceals faults.

What does Hamilton believe a single executive can provide that multiple cannot?

• More debate

• Clear responsibility

• Increased secrecy

• More representation

What does Hamilton argue is a potential danger of a single executive?

• Monarchical power

• Less secrecy

• Increased debate

• Lack of energy