Judicial Inquiries

What is a key aim of judicial inquiries?

• To determine criminal liability

• To review the legality of government decisions

• To establish facts and learn lessons

• To replace the role of judicial review

Which of the following best describes the independence of judicial inquiries?

• They are established and controlled by the government of the day.

• They operate independently of the government, ensuring objectivity.

• They are primarily focused on supporting the government's position.

• Their findings are always legally binding on the government.

What power do judicial inquiries possess under the Inquiries Act 2005?

• The power to overturn legislation

• The power to compel witnesses to testify

• The power to impose legal penalties

• The power to appoint government ministers

What is a key strength of judicial inquiries in relation to government policy?

• They always lead to immediate government action.

• They provide evidence-based recommendations for policy changes.

• They replace the need for political debate.

• They ensure the government cannot make any mistakes.

What did the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry help to create?

• A new political party

• Immense public and political pressure for overturning convictions

• A change in the voting system

• A reduction in the powers of the judiciary

What is a key characteristic of judicial inquiries that contributes to their strength?

• Their speed of completion

• Their low cost

• Their thoroughness and meticulousness

• Their focus on assigning blame

What does the thoroughness of judicial inquiries help to ensure?

• Minimal public interest

• A comprehensive examination of complex events

• Quick resolutions

• Reduced legal representation

Which inquiry involved hearing from over 900 witnesses?

• The Grenfell Tower Inquiry

• The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry

• The Saville Inquiry

• The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry

How long did the Saville Inquiry last?

• 2 years

• 5 years

• 12 years

• 1 year

What is a significant criticism of judicial inquiries in terms of cost?

• They are too cheap to be effective.

• They represent poor value for the taxpayer.

• They reduce the cost of legal representation.

• They have no impact on public spending.